Why be a LEO?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Being a LEO has to be a difficult job. I have known several. The good ones were truly honerable people. The bad ones were sometimes very, very bad. I only knew one moderately bad LEO that got convicted (Breaking and entering, larceny, while on duty with his partner, multiple counts) and sent to prison. The worst lost his job and instantly got a job in the next town (KKK member, shooting at a 10 y.o. black child after he crossed the road on a bycycle, not at an intersection and ran when the COP car pulled up behind him in a field with lights and siren). COPS usually get a pass though. I have worked before with the FBI (not an agent myself) and all the cases I knew about seemed very valid and some were very high profile. I am afraid that local COPS, due to local politicians, are trending toward revenue collection for the benefit of their local governments more than they are protectors of citizens individual rights to life, safety and property.

Just like everyone, many good, some bad. Each should be treated with respect until they prove they don't deserve it. Say thank you to the good ones. Ignore the bad ones if you can, God will sort out the facts.
 
So the latest bunch of anti-LEO threads have got me wondering... why would anyone want to be a LEO?

Get to carry a gun and it's an easy job with good pay. (around here anyways).

I could never be one though as I don't believe in the War on Some Drugs or alot of the other things they do.
 
I've been planning to join the local Police service for the past year now.

At the beginning, it was spawned by an unhealthy interest in firearms. I thought having a nice big belt full of toys would be really cool, like being Batman, fighter of crime.

Then I met some constables, and then my whole world went upside down.

For the first time, I learned who and what good men were, and what they were made out of.


It's more than being a good shot.

It's more than being tough.

It's even more than being honorable and having integrity.


I still can't say what it is I see in all these people who chose to become constables, but I'm sure it's there. And they are filling some really big shoes.

I can only pray that I will be able to do the same.
 
I used to want to be a police officer. I was ultra conservative, gung ho, idealistic and had a strong sense of right and wrong.

Then I saw what the job can do to some folks and figured it might be in my best interest to stay a civilian.

There are some good cops out there that care and will go out of their way to help. I thank them.

With all the requirements and drawbacks of police work I am surprised departments can find idealistic educated youth with clean backrounds to fill the positions
 
The uniforms look cool and the pay is ok.
Besides you get to beat people up now and then or get you ass kicked, either way its a great job.

Pride and professionalism is why i am an LEO, i also need a way to pay the bills.
 
Bopleo
I can do all that being abouncer and be a lot safer while doing too.
You ever heard of "Bouncer Killer " bullets?
:eek:
 
I really cannot answer that question without sounding textbookish, but my answer falls in line with duty, sevice, and something I've always wanted to do.
 
(sorry for the long response)

That is a really interesting list of pro’s and con’s you have TechBrute. I’d say every single one of your pro’s is either wrong or not really much of a reason for joining law enforcement. I’ll try to explain why and then try to explain why I think people pick a career in law enforcement.

* Law Enforcement Officers don’t “get†to carry a gun, they have to carry a gun. Strapping on a gun belt every day before you go to work to “fight crime†is shockingly different then putting a gun on your waist each day for your own personal self-defense needs. In the latter a gun is needed to deal with bad luck or poor choices, a fairly low likelihood of need. In the former the gun is needed because you are required to spend your workday dealing with others poor life choices, a fairly high likelihood of need.

* Deciding if law enforcement actually “makes a difference†or not is hard to do. It is virtually impossible to quantify any sort of deterrence effect, and the court system really has the final say in keeping a criminal out of society. Of course, that same court system would be pretty ineffective without a “strong arm of the law†at work. In the end I think it is safe to say that most people believe America would be a far worse place without a law enforcement presence. I know I believe that.

* Paid administrative leave is usually used to avoid firing an individual while a matter is still under investigation. Of course some things are actually punished with “days on the beach†but my understanding is that it is usually for policy type violations, not actual criminal violations. You know, an avoidable accident in a government vehicle or something similar. Of course every agency has it’s own policy so it might be different where you are…

* I would agree that LEO’s generally cut other LEO’s a break when it comes to traffic tickets. Then again, most law enforcement around where I live cut concealed handgun license holders a break too…and firemen…and paramedics…Of course, joining law enforcement just so you can get out of a couple of traffic tickets is a pretty stupid reason.

* In a “situation†an officer certainly does have the power to “make people do what he says†but then that isn’t so much an advantage as it is a burden. Do you have any idea why an officer has to control a “situationâ€? The majority of the time an officer is reacting to something an individual does, and trying to react to a pistol shot coming from the gun hidden in the individuals front pocket is pretty tough to do. Asking (or from your perspective “makingâ€) that same individual keep his hands out of his pockets is a much easier and safer option that, when done properly, doesn’t hurt anybody.

* I certainly can’t speak for all law enforcement agencies, but when I joined there were over ninety thousand applicants, less than a thousand were actually hired and made it through all of the training. I’d figure that’s a good bit more stringent set of qualifications than most of the other jobs out there.

Now after all of that, I’ll tell you why I think people pick a career in law enforcement; and that is to help their fellow man. Most every person in law enforcement saw some sort of a problem in either American, their state, their city or some other local area and felt that law enforcement was the best way they personally could do something about it. Some people see one problem while other people see a different set of problems, which is why there is such a vast array of law enforcement organizations. However, in the end law enforcement officers are doing what they can to help their community fix a problem. And no amount of “con’s†can ever outweigh the one “pro†of every workday personally doing something to help fix that particular problem. You might not see any problems, or at least you might not see how law enforcement does anything to help fix those problems. In my book though, I’m pretty dang glad there are those that do see a problem and do feel the responsibility of fixing it.
 
Not being a LEO, I couldn't tell you, but being fond of the rule of law, it's clear to me that someone has to do it.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top