TimboKhan
Member
you know, I had a Davis Derrigner in .32, and it was fun to shoot, and it always got alot of attention at the range. I ended up giving it to my friend as a b-day gift, and he still shoots it. Now, was it accurate? NO!!!!!!!!!!!! I could get hits within maybe 5-10 feet, but that was about it. Speaking solely on the Davis, it was a gun I used for breaking out on the range and making a little noise - in other words, it was cool. I do happen to think that Derringers represent a viable alternative when no other gun will do, depending on quality and caliber, but to be perfectly honest with you, I would prefer to have a knife to that particular Davis gun, because I honestly think that at its effective range, I would be able to do more damage with a knife. Thats not an indictement against the .32, either. I think we all can agree that the .32 is a poor choice for a defensive round, but it does have its place, and it is definitly better than a sharp stick. I am specifically referring to the gun: I. E. someone physically attacking me and me having to cock, fire in such a way as to not shoot myself (which I would think would be pretty easy in a close engagement where blows are being exchanged, especially given the exposed trigger), and then having to repeat.