yy
Member
Aside from 1) police organizations natually want to maintain a monopoly on police powers, 2) no sane sheriff/police chief want to expose their department to liabilities if they give public approval for common citizen arrest, and 3) the burgler can sue for imprisonment and probably win
What are the downsides, tactically and strategically, for a *single* citizen who arrests and then books a burgler?
What changes if we have multiple citizens? What about disturbing the peace to armed robbery?
I mean I don't want to pretend to be a saint. I do want to protect my property (my life for sure). And threats of violence work so much better with actually violence to back up the threat. Who actually would claim that a burgler would apologize and run when I walk in and say "please stop with a cherry on top."
How am I supposed to arrest (at least stop) said burgler?
note: I had my hubcaps ripped off by a street bum. The jerk saw me coming but I didn't know at the time. It just looked at me and walked off with my hubcaps. Once I saw the missing stuff sticking out of its handbag, I yelled stop! It just walked away never looking back.
the upside is that I am not hurt and my livelihood was not in jeopardy.
The downside is that my territory was violated and I could not do what I wanted to do. I specifically did not run after and arrest the bum because I was angry and did not want to give the bum a free meal ticket for the rest of its life (that's what would happen if I used force to arrest, out of anger, then it sues and wins).
Think about these:
1. The bum had literally no property to lose. I could have my wages garnished for the rest of my life.
2. A lawyer can use a technicality to get me: touching or grabbing the burgler can be assault
3. It's just wrong that I have to pray for the bum to turn a knife on me so I can use deadly force.
There's got to be a way affect arrest and defend my territory and property!
What are the downsides, tactically and strategically, for a *single* citizen who arrests and then books a burgler?
What changes if we have multiple citizens? What about disturbing the peace to armed robbery?
I mean I don't want to pretend to be a saint. I do want to protect my property (my life for sure). And threats of violence work so much better with actually violence to back up the threat. Who actually would claim that a burgler would apologize and run when I walk in and say "please stop with a cherry on top."
How am I supposed to arrest (at least stop) said burgler?
note: I had my hubcaps ripped off by a street bum. The jerk saw me coming but I didn't know at the time. It just looked at me and walked off with my hubcaps. Once I saw the missing stuff sticking out of its handbag, I yelled stop! It just walked away never looking back.
the upside is that I am not hurt and my livelihood was not in jeopardy.
The downside is that my territory was violated and I could not do what I wanted to do. I specifically did not run after and arrest the bum because I was angry and did not want to give the bum a free meal ticket for the rest of its life (that's what would happen if I used force to arrest, out of anger, then it sues and wins).
Think about these:
1. The bum had literally no property to lose. I could have my wages garnished for the rest of my life.
2. A lawyer can use a technicality to get me: touching or grabbing the burgler can be assault
3. It's just wrong that I have to pray for the bum to turn a knife on me so I can use deadly force.
There's got to be a way affect arrest and defend my territory and property!