Centurian22
Member
Ok, I'm relatively new to centerfire rifle shooting. I have a Savage Axis XP 20" barrel in .308 with the included Bushnell 3-9X40 scope. I have now shot five different ammo's through it: "HSM HPBT 168gr 7.62x51 (.308)", Federal Gold Medal Match sierra matchking 168gr HPBT, Winchester Super-X 180gr and 150gr, and one other cheap 147gr FMJ BT who's name eludes me at the moment.
Ok enough background, onto my question:
I would obviously expect elevation variances in the diff ammo's due to velocity, weight and other variables; however I have now experienced two Windage variations of 4" or more.
Starting with the HSM which I used to get on paper and sight in the rifle, the FGMM 168 was in the same spot, the Win Super-X 180 I couldn't get any consistent results from, the Win Super-x 150 POI was 4-5" left of the FGMM, then the cheap 147 FMJ BT was another 4-5" left from the super-x putting it 8-10" left of the FGMM! This was all shot from bench rest (no lead sled or anything like that) at 100yrds until the cheap stuff that I shot at 50 because I was having trouble with it (which turned out to be me because my wife produced a nice 1" group of 4 shots at 50yrds the second time she ever shot it (first was only two rounds just testing it out when I was sighting it in).
So what I'm asking and looking for here is this: is this much windage difference 'normal' or within reason between brands and weights of bullets? Or is it more likely user error such as inconsistent cheek weld or head alignment with the scope? I know that I need to just get out and put quite a few rounds of one type down range to work on and try to perfect my form (hold, cheek weld, trigger control ect). I will probably do this with the cheap stuff because it's alot easier on the wallet at $17 / box of 20 at my LGS compared to $26-$35 / box of 20 of the FGMM. Unless my wife got very lucky, the ammo seems good enough for initial practice until I get consistent and confident in my own abilities. Then I'll switch to my whitetail deer round of choice (possibly federal fusion 150 or win super-x 150) and get sighted and practiced for different shooting positions to be ready for the fall.
Thanks for any and all input, especially in regards to the Windage varience mystery!
Chad
Ok enough background, onto my question:
I would obviously expect elevation variances in the diff ammo's due to velocity, weight and other variables; however I have now experienced two Windage variations of 4" or more.
Starting with the HSM which I used to get on paper and sight in the rifle, the FGMM 168 was in the same spot, the Win Super-X 180 I couldn't get any consistent results from, the Win Super-x 150 POI was 4-5" left of the FGMM, then the cheap 147 FMJ BT was another 4-5" left from the super-x putting it 8-10" left of the FGMM! This was all shot from bench rest (no lead sled or anything like that) at 100yrds until the cheap stuff that I shot at 50 because I was having trouble with it (which turned out to be me because my wife produced a nice 1" group of 4 shots at 50yrds the second time she ever shot it (first was only two rounds just testing it out when I was sighting it in).
So what I'm asking and looking for here is this: is this much windage difference 'normal' or within reason between brands and weights of bullets? Or is it more likely user error such as inconsistent cheek weld or head alignment with the scope? I know that I need to just get out and put quite a few rounds of one type down range to work on and try to perfect my form (hold, cheek weld, trigger control ect). I will probably do this with the cheap stuff because it's alot easier on the wallet at $17 / box of 20 at my LGS compared to $26-$35 / box of 20 of the FGMM. Unless my wife got very lucky, the ammo seems good enough for initial practice until I get consistent and confident in my own abilities. Then I'll switch to my whitetail deer round of choice (possibly federal fusion 150 or win super-x 150) and get sighted and practiced for different shooting positions to be ready for the fall.
Thanks for any and all input, especially in regards to the Windage varience mystery!
Chad