WOOHOO! Alaska on it's way to VT style CCW Reform

Status
Not open for further replies.
I guess we will just have to agree to disagree. Here is what I think it comes down to (I am attributing things to "You" which is the Spiff/Wild collective, because it's easier to read :D ):
  • We are both not comfortable with untrained people carrying concealed weapons. You want to mandate state training. I want to remove the training requirement.
  • We are both not happy that a person in critical need of carrying concealed would have to do it unlawfully. You advocate breaking the law. I advocate repealing the law.
  • We are both okay with people carrying openly. You are unconfortable if they untuck their shirt. I could care less.
  • We both agree that a firearm is not the ONLY self-defense tool. You believe it should be specially regulated. I believe it is just a particular tool, and should not be regulated.
  • You think that government training helps provide a bit of safety to others. I believe that it is just another barrier provided by the antis.

I think that about sums it up.

-Pytron
 
What I DO know is that one day we'll be having this same argument over licencing requirements to OWN.

"I don't want my neighbor shooting me through his wall".

<sigh>

When obstacles designed to discourage participation become encouraged by their victims, an anti-gun victory has truly been consolidated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top