Your favorite: 686-what?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Richard.Howe

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2003
Messages
887
I love my 686's -- I have a no-dash oldie, and a -5. My question for you guys is twofold:

1) What's your favorite dash variant? and
2) What's your opinion of the -5 versions with 7-shot cylinders?

Thanks!
Rich
 
The 7 shot would not be my main choice - I have a Taurus M66 7 shot and tho I like it - somehow due to old age and traditionalism - it does not seem ''right"!:p

By fave 686 is probably an unusual one - in that I favor the 6". I had a ''no dash' which went - and this year replaced that gap with another - even adding to it the (fortunately kept) piece of (lump! LOL) of steel (15 ounces) I machined for the first one.

Reason? - this is for me an ideal platform for PPC shooting - and so it is a dedicated revo. I would love to have a 3" or 4" but those gaps are filled by my N frame Smiths.


m686-weight-49-s.jpg
 
I like my 686-4 , still had the traditional firing pin and the option to add optics is easy with the drilled and tapped frame. The accuracy of my 686-4 has been exceptional. It is a 6" model.
 
I have a 686-5 seven shot model. I believe the -6 introduced the key lock.

The seven shot capability is what drew me to it. I'm probably less of a traditionalist than most. I've been very happy with it. The only downside I can see is there a far fewer choices in speedloaders.
 
scotty said:
I have a 686-5 seven shot model. I believe the -6 introduced the key lock.

The seven shot capability is what drew me to it. I'm probably less of a traditionalist than most. I've been very happy with it. The only downside I can see is there a far fewer choices in speedloaders.

Like scotty and the originator of this thread, I have the -5 (seven shot). And yes, the -5 is the last model before the lock.

Ditto on the fewer choices for speedloaders - I still use the HKS speedloaders and they aren't exactly fast. Safariland Comp IIIs do not come in 7-shot versions.
 
i have 686-6, 6 shots, 6" barrel (does that make it a 6-6-6?). The recoil is addictive :D
I use safariland II, much better than the HKS. You just have to push in, as opposed to matching the rounds with the holes first, then turn with the HKS.
 
I don't like full lugs. I put up with them in my new 625JM. I had to have a 5" Dealer Stocking Exclusive from last year - a 686-6 7-shooter with the partial lug, HiViz front sight, V-notch rear, and Ahrends squared f-g cocobolo stocks. It was priced the same as a 4" 686 - what a bargain! It's life thus far has been boring - 158gr clad RN over 4.5-5.0gr Titegroup in a Federal primed .357 Magnum case for 850-900 fps along with an assortment of lead .38 Special ammo. I love it! It points nearly as well as my similarly stocked/front sighted 6" 66.

Stainz
 
This is my only 686-5. Personally, I like the full lug. Bought it used and I had a local gunsmith do a trigger-job. Made a big difference. I'm also happy with the accuracy. This target was 50 rounds at 25 feet.

DSCN1031.gif
 
686-4
IIRC, the first revision built with newly-purchased CNC machinery. (Turns out Tomkins was good for something, I guess).
Don't remember if it was the first revision with the square extractor or not-- that may have been the 686-3.

686-5
First revision built with MIM parts and frame-mounted firing pin (as mentioned)
Round butt now standard* (Hogue conversion grips supplied on 4"+ models).
Hogue grips now have the ambi "thumbrests" and S&W logo
First revision with pinned-in front sight.
First revision with new style thumb piece.
First revision without the grooved backstrap**
First revision available with 7-round cylinder (as mentioned).


Not sure about transitional models (e.g. 686-4s with one or more of the 686-5 features). 686-4s were being sold in 1994 and 686-5s started being sold in 1998, so there's room for that sort of thing. Also not sure how the flash-chromed and case-hardened triggers and hammers were distributed across revisions. I'd hazard a guess, but I may have already overstepped myself by going too much on memory as it is.

There seems to be a lot of love for the 686-4, since that was the last one built without MIM or the lock, but built on the newer CNC equipment. Mine's got around 9k of my handloads put through it, and I'd consider it just about broken in.

In spite of what appears to be lots of cost-cutting measures, my 686-5 and the ones I've shot were all very well put together. The 686-4 (and others) built on the new CNC machinery during this time left a lot of people impressed (not *too* hard after some of the Lear-Siegler and Bangor Puta disasters, I guess) and was a hard act to follow.

Yep, there are a lot of nice, old revolvers out there. My grandfather's .32 Regulation Police is a prime example. (It's also in a tragic state of disrepair. See, those beautiful nickel and blue finishes require a lot of maintenance over the course of 70 years or so...) But, talk to some folks that actually carried those older revolvers for actual use and hand them a new S&W. You going to get a lot more "Damn, that's nice." responses that you may be ready for.

Some of us can truly appreciate the older models that were built by hand. We can also appreciate some of the advances that have been made and incorporated into the newer models. That "soul" that everyone is so keen on didn't come from the factory. It came, over time, from the owners and being used. My 681-2 already has soul. Given time, the even newer models will have plenty of it, too.

Still won't own one of those abominations with the damn lock, though.



* This may be a transitional feature. I don't remember.

** The 581/681s of any revision didn't have this, nor did they have the glare-reducing finish on the top of the barrel, IIRC.
 
I like the 686 7 shot models that still have a hammer mounted firing pin. In addition to the CS1 version, I feel these are among the most desireable 686 versions. I have a 686-5 4" I bought for $150(long story) that is a good gun though. I can live with all the changes S&W did until the lock. There will be no 686-6 for me.
 
Have a 686-2 with an 8 3/8" barrel. Bought it new with a target style set of sights which I understand was popular with silouette?? shooters. Boy, I'd better learn to spell.

It's hard to imagine how accurate it is with 148 gr. wadcutters. Like shooting a .22.

Anyway, definitely the most accurate handgun I've ever fired.

Safe shooting.
 
Mine is a 686 (No dash.)
It's a snubby, and it's more accurate than any (Iron sighted) .357 I've ever shot, including my 5 1/2" 627 'model of 1989', or my 586 6 1/2". Which is saying a lot.
I use business cards as targets at 25 yards, and the staple is really the target. Not bad for a snubby, huh? The gun just loves factory magtech 125 grainers, or my rip snortin' reloads.
Blackhawks with red dots don't really count, that's like cheating.
 
Owned 2-686s. First one was a 686 no dash, 8 3/8 in. barrel. The high polish finish and trigger were perfect. The second is a 686-5, 2 1/2 in. barrel. The finish wasn't nearly as nice as the first. The gun looked like it had machine oil baked into the stainless steel, but with Flitz and lots of elbow grease it looks better than when I bought it. The trigger wasn't nearly as nice as the first, but with more rounds through it the trigger has smoothed up considerably. If it weren't for the unwieldliness of the 8 3/8 in. barrel, I would have kept the first. Fortunately, I sold the gun to my brother, so I get to shoot it from time to time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top