Daughter's school

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's not throw fuel onto the low flames on this point. His post has been duly noted and handled at the admin level.

Have a nice day. :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The only problem with home schooling is . . .

As long as you still pay taxes, a portion of which go to the Board of Edu., the system actually benefits from you pulling your child out. That's one less kid they have to buy a book for, and your tax dollars are still going to support something you don't approve of.

I cannot tell you what to do in this case. I will say that this teacher has probably read one too many Brady campaign newsletters.
 
well.. I was threatened with expulsion on many occasions by my teachers. nothing ever came of it, they were idle threats. the only real time the gun debate came up in school for me went something like this....

My teacher in high school for "US government" class taught that " the 2nd amendment allows people to have guns, but do you need a 30rd mag to hunt deer, no, ok next lesson...

When I raised my hand to object this is what his reply was. " i really don't care what u believe, but this is what i HAVE to teach. so fill out what i said on the test, and then go about believing what you want because nobody here cares, I know that, you know that, thats why where just filling out papers to get everyone there diploma. IF you want to fight for a cause do it in college where i don't have to be bothered."

I put my hand down and did just that...........
 
OMG that school would belong to me. I would have the teacher, principal, school board and superintendent FIRED. This is crazy I would not send her back to that school or to that school district.

I am not one to think about suing every one, but this is NUTS something has to be done to this crazy person.
 
I want you to all pay attention to this. This is 4 pages of examples of why the pro-gun movement will fail miserably in everything it does. Instead of gathering up to help a fellow gun owner, you all attack him. You put him under a microscope like a damn disease and see what you can find to kill him off.

Who cares if the story is real or BS. It's the next thing that's going to happen if it's not true. We have kids being expelled for Glock pens and doctors asking child patients if their parents have guns. It doesn't take Reed freaking Richards to make the stretch to this being true.

But instead of uniting to further your cause, you divide and cannibalize instead.
 
I want you to all pay attention to this. This is 4 pages of examples of why the pro-gun movement will fail miserably in everything it does. Instead of gathering up to help a fellow gun owner, you all attack him. You put him under a microscope like a damn disease and see what you can find to kill him off.

Who cares if the story is real or BS. It's the next thing that's going to happen if it's not true. We have kids being expelled for Glock pens and doctors asking child patients if their parents have guns. It doesn't take Reed freaking Richards to make the stretch to this being true.

But instead of uniting to further your cause, you divide and cannibalize instead.
Gosh, we're not failing too miserably here in Ohio, what with getting concealed carry, then reforming it, repealing virtually every gun control law in the state and being well on our way to getting castle doctrine.

Let's see, you've basically said, "Who cares if somebody's telling the truth? We have to stick by them... because." Well, if I thought that were a good idea, I'd be planning to write in Dennis Kucinich in the general election. I've got a newsflash for you. It DOES matter if somebody's telling the truth. If it didn't, Sarah Brady and Josh Sugerman would be winning... and they AREN'T.

I wasn't sure if the OP was on the up and up. You've just convinced me that YOU aren't.

So, how are things over at AHSA?
 
Kudos to your daughter for standing up on this issue.

Homeschooling will help you avoid this sort of nonsense.
No matter how many times the hook is pointed out, the bait just keeps working.
 
If true this story is helpful.

If false this story should be posted at the VPC with the rest of their nonsense.

Lies only hurt our cause. The reason we have been winning the fight is because we do not try to pass off lies as truth and the enemy does.

It is good that the enemy has only lies and emotional appeals as their only weapons. These are not weapons that we can pick up and use.
 
Looks Like I got hooked by a troll. Thoughing the hook now.

If this was real the origonal poster would have issued some follow up.
 
I want you to all pay attention to this.
I'm on the edge of my seat.

This is 4 pages of examples of why the pro-gun movement will fail miserably in everything it does.
Really? An ever-increasing number of states with shall-issue CCW, castle doctrine laws, DC's gun bans on the ropes, et al....are signs of a movement doomed to miserable failure?

Instead of gathering up to help a fellow gun owner, you all attack him. You put him under a microscope like a damn disease and see what you can find to kill him off.
No. We identify someone trying to blow smoke up our collective skirts.

Who cares if the story is real or BS.
Are you for real? The truth simply isn't an issue for you?

It's the next thing that's going to happen if it's not true. We have kids being expelled for Glock pens and doctors asking child patients if their parents have guns. It doesn't take Reed freaking Richards to make the stretch to this being true.
Ah, so....it might happen somewhere at some point in the future, so we need to be up in arms over a bugus claim that is *has* happened.

But instead of uniting to further your cause
Blindly swallowing a B.S. story does not constitute uniting to further a cause.

you divide and cannibalize instead.
I'd rather weed out the liars and others of questionable character myself rather than have the public perceive us as a bunch of gullible dopes who'll grasp at anything for support.
 
Last edited:
I call complete and utter BS on this "story". Anyone else notice that the OP, Oldsoldier, has not posted ONCE since his original post? He even ended it with a question like me was looking for help from us. Typical trollish behavior. Start a thread and enjoy watching everyone get all stirred up for nothing. :rolleyes:
 
"Who cares if the story is real or BS. It's the next thing that's going to happen if it's not true."


ahhh the old "it coulda happened that way" as put forth by charlene drew jarvis
 
I'd rather weed out the liars and others of questionable character myself rather than have the public perceive us as a bunch of gullible dopes who'll grasp at anything for support.
I completely agree. There is a saying that I bear in mind frequently that says that the surest way to discredit an idea or a movement is to defend it by intentionally misrepresenting the facts. The last thing we need is to rally behind an obvious absurdity.
 
Yup, just like the Dan Rather lie about Dubya and how the Swift Boat Vets stomped the livin' crap out of "Flush the John Kerry".
 
Ah, so....it might happen somewhere at some point in the future, so we need to be up in arms over a bugus claim that is *has* happened.

And each and every one of you do this with theoretical scenarios in the tactics forum.

So, not only do we have a good example of you people eating your own, we also get a good example of THR's other problem...

Hypocrisy.
 
XDK.... It is hypocrisy to accept falsehoods from your own camp while decrying them from your opponents. That's what you are doing.

I don't believe this story. I think it is a mistake to go charging off half-cocked when people are trying to fool us. It makes us look... foolish.

If the story is true, well, I've been wrong before. Proof is possible and will be accepted. Without proof... well... where does it buy us anything to accept absurdities and end up looking like idiots? I just don't see how it helps "The cause".
 
"And each and every one of you do this with theoretical scenarios in the tactics forum."

ooohhhhh look one of those broad everyone does it statement! my favorite sign of some one whos less aged. making statements that clearly are less than true serves what purpose? i never understood it
 
Huh?

I have never heard of a teacher having the power to suspend a student, much less expel one. No principal I know of would do that. Either the principal is conning you or the teacher conned him to get this done. Usually you are buried in parent teacher prinicpal conferences before anything happens.
 
And each and every one of you do this with theoretical scenarios in the tactics forum.
Leaving the "each and every one of you" falsehood alone (do try finding a post of mine in the tactics forum; you'll have a difficult time finding nonexistent posts), there is a distinct difference between discussing theoretical scenarios as theoretical scenarios and treating falsehoods as facts.

It is one thing to posit a hypothetical situation and use that as a mental exercise for how one might deal with the situation even while knowing that said situation is not reality. It is another to treat a hypothetical situation as though it were reality.

For example, every time I drive somewhere, I could, hypothetically, be hit by a drunk driver. Treating this as a hypothetical situation leads to me being sure to maintain alertness while driving without assuming that I actually will be hit; that is to say, I attempt to reasonably mitigate the risks of the hypothetical occurrence without assuming that the hypothetical situation is a certainty. If I were to treat it as reality, I wouldn't even get into the car. Treating hypothetical situations as hypothetical situations leads to proper preparation. Treating hypothetical situations as reality leads to paranoia and reduces one's credibility as well as one's ability to function in society.
 
XDK.... It is hypocrisy to accept falsehoods from your own camp while decrying them from your opponents.

Now that's funny. Not a single one of you know if this story is true or not. Your all assuming it's not.

Don't sit here and try and defend assumptions.

When a story is linked about a shooting you all say "there isn't enough information, let's not assume anything" yet you all assume something here and then cannibalize one of your own.

Again, hypocrisy.

You don't even give someone from your own camp the benefit of the doubt on their story.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top