Anybody going back to revolvers in their old age?
I think that was the terminology when I bought my first handgun, a Browning Hi-Power, in 1962.By the way, anybody remember when they used to call them Auto-Loaders?
this is one reason i use them.. quite frankly, im cheap.. as a cheap person, i dont like to let expensive brass go to waste, so i reload.. and quite frankly i dont feel like picking it off the groundYep. I'm simplifying more and more, as it fits my lifestyle. Nothing wrong with auto pistols, but it hurts now to bend over and pick up the brass.
--Never did much like the "pickin' chicken" drill, but now with these back issues, simply turing the revolver upside down over the brass basket and punching the ejector rod is much more appealing.
Holy cow! Glow in the dark sights, light and laser . . . . . he won't have a tough time seeing you!!
Theres only one way to shoot a DA revolver, and there are no "thumbs" involved in doing so.Just have to ask, are you shooting the Smiths SA or DA?
I wouldn't fully agree with that but when one makes a statement like this I have to ask the question.Theres only one way to shoot a DA revolver, and there are no "thumbs" involved in doing so.
The scales tipped when I bought my first J-frame snub-nose (638) ~ 2 weeks ago. Only one range day so far, but to my surprise, in my hands shooting side-by-side, it easily outshot my G26 (forget the LCP - can't anything with that), and I'm pretty sure my G19 as I shoot both Glocks about the same for me. Not sure, but it must be the trigger action that results in all my revolvers shooting better for me.
By the way, anybody remember when they used to call them Auto-Loaders?
Anybody going back to revolvers in their old age?