What is the Smallest, Lightest Defensive Pistol You WOuld Rely On ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Old Dog for me it is simply a case of carrying the largest available gun that fits my current circumstance. Lately that has resulted in me either taking a sick day from work or not carrying. When people tell me carrying less than a 9mm (or 45 for some) what I hear is I'm better off not being armed at all. I get that you and others are well intended in your advice but the demands on our lives just must be different and require different approaches. Please understand we are just trying to fit personal defense into our current lifestyle and not the other way around.
Agree 100% with this. Carry the firearm that fits the circumstance. Although I have a wide range of handguns available to me from .22 to .454 Casull as an elderly gent I carry, and prefer, 90% of the time, my Colt Detective Special in .38 Special loaded with Hornady Critical Defense Lite. I find I can shoot it accurately, out to twenty feet, with decent follow up shots.
Since I retired last year I like to take walks in the morning right when the sun is coming up. In the wintertime I can get away with having my Colt in my hoodie pocket but not during the summertime. This morning at 0600 Hrs. it was 84 degrees with 70 % humidity so anything above a pair of shorts and a tank top would be intolerable so I have to pack light. A Beretta 950 Jetfire in .25 fits fine in my back pocket with my cell in the other. The .25 is fairly anemic but I don't think I'm going to run into much of a problem where I live although it is fairly rural. I come across feral pigs and coyotes quite often but they don't want anything to do with me. If circumstances change I will adapt.
My extended family has a large piece of property in SW Texas near Valentine. When I'm out and about down there, usually on a 4 wheeler, it's prudent to take precautions from four and, regrettably, two legged varmints. SW Model 25 in .45 LC in an open carry holster on my right hip or Hi-Power in a shoulder holster along with an AR or SKS in a scabbard. It wasn't like that 40 years ago but times and people have changed.
 
While I have an old Colt .32 ACP, its barrel appears to be shot out and its accuracy is only good to about 25 feet.
The smallest gun I would depend on is my Astra .380 that I have owned for about 40 years. It is one of the guns I have stashed around the house - JIC. I also have a .357 hanging in its holster in the bedroom on the gunrack and just below a 12 ga. and an AK.
 
Old Dog for me it is simply a case of carrying the largest available gun that fits my current circumstance. Lately that has resulted in me either taking a sick day from work or not carrying. When people tell me carrying less than a 9mm (or 45 for some) what I hear is I'm better off not being armed at all. I get that you and others are well intended in your advice but the demands on our lives just must be different and require different approaches. Please understand we are just trying to fit personal defense into our current lifestyle and not the other way around.
Sometimes, one's lifestyle simply doesn't fit with what the threat one may face will be. Good luck with that.
 
The answer for me is: nothing. Literally nothing. I often don't carry (too much time in and out of secured environments, relatively safe office and residence locations, etc.). I'm quite comfortable in most of my daily life being armed with nothing more than situational awareness and a charming personality. Others with different life circumstances, of course, may feel differently.

The corollary to that is that when I decide to carry, it's usually because I am going outside of my little circle of relative safety. Maybe I'm going into the woods where there are known bears, or back to a rougher old neighborhood I used to live, or maybe I'm running to the store late in the evening, or to a really crowded-yet-uncontrolled environment where the risk of "random" events is higher. If I'm going do depart from my usual (which is not carrying), then I'm going to make it worth the bother. A commander-sized 1911 is the smallest thing I'll bother strapping on.
 
I have a fire extinguisher in my kitchen, and not a fire truck in my driveway.
While pithy, a poor analogy. We're talking personal choices easily within the realm of possibility, not extremes. Were that the case, I'd like to cart around an M-134 Mini-gun.
 
With no disrespect to others posting in this thread, and with no intent to seriously derail the thread -- I think my thoughts are in line with the thread's question.

So I totally get that many here feel the need to carry a light compact or sub-compact handgun ... But what I'm concluding here is that a large percentage of the members posting in this thread feel entirely comfortable carrying a "mouse-gun" in an inferior caliber with only a small number of cartridges on tap ...

Does this mean that those folks don't really believe they'll encounter a serious threat (say a couple large bad hombres tweaking to the gills whose give-a-crap meters are broken and with the element of surprise going for them) in which they'd actually be far better off with a more easily-drawn piece (read: not buried in a pocket or with a tiny grip under layers of clothing in a thin, clingy holster) in an effective caliber (.38/.357, 9mm or larger) that can be fired much more easily, rapidly and effectively?

I'm inclined to believe as this guy does:


I guess some of us just plain for worst-case scenarios, while others don't believe they'll ever really encounter serious violence. Any regular Wal-Mart customers here? (surely some here saw the case involving one of our local (just a small suburb of a medium sized city) Wal-Mart incidents the other day?)

Really though, what is planning for the "worst-case scenarios"? Do you keep an AR15 strapped around your shoulder with 6 loaded mags in a vest? Or do you require a battle rifle in case you need more range? Because all things considered, all handguns are pretty poor defense weapons. For the majority of self defense scenarios, the difference between a 6 shot LCP and a Glock 21 with extra mags is pretty negligible.


Me, around the house I keep a NAA .22 in my pocket. When I'm out the smallest I carry is an LCP, but I prefer to have a j-frame.
 
eally though, what is planning for the "worst-case scenarios"? Do you keep an AR15 strapped around your shoulder with 6 loaded mags in a vest? Or do you require a battle rifle in case you need more range?

Eh, get a shot timer (free from App Store, works ok) and run a couple el prez drills. Draw an LCP from your pocket and then try the same drill with a Glock 19ish sized gun. LCP is laughable, especially when most criminals that use guns aren’t carrying pocket pistols.
 
Eh, get a shot timer (free from App Store, works ok) and run a couple el prez drills. Draw an LCP from your pocket and then try the same drill with a Glock 19ish sized gun. LCP is laughable, especially when most criminals that use guns aren’t carrying pocket pistols.

An LCP might be laughable for that drill, but I was talking about self defense situations. Which typically means close quarters, one attacker, and 2-3 shots fired; all well within the capabilities of an LCP.
 
Really though, what is planning for the "worst-case scenarios"? Do you keep an AR15 strapped around your shoulder with 6 loaded mags in a vest? Or do you require a battle rifle in case you need more range? Because all things considered, all handguns are pretty poor defense weapons. For the majority of self defense scenarios, the difference between a 6 shot LCP and a Glock 21 with extra mags is pretty negligible.
Well, since the thread topic is about the smallest, lightest handgun one would rely upon for self-defense, presumably carrying it concealed, I'm simply speaking to the smallest, lightest handgun I would rely on should I require a handgun for self-defense in the event of a worst-case scenario (say a crazy guy shooting up a Wal-Mart and trying to carjack people at the gas station, firing multiple rounds into their vehicles, which, oh wait, just happened the other day in my area ... or more than one assailant ... a business robbery gone bad ... whatever). Given the choice between an LCP and a Glock 21 with extra mags, I'd go Glock every time. I've been visited by violence, though, so I'm not denigrating anyone's personal choice, just wondering why a few ounces in weight or an inch or two in length makes so many compromise.
 
What is the Smallest, Lightest Defensive Pistol You WOuld Rely On ?
The smallest, lightest defensive pistol I will rely on is my Ruger LC9s. I'm simply not comfortable relying on anything smaller than 9mm.

Maybe something between a small NAA .22lr revolver on the low end to a .380 ACP mouse gun on the high end.
If I absolutely, positively had to pick something in this range, it would probably be a Ruger LCP in .380ACP. Not sure I am really comfortable with .380 ammo, but its certainly the best you are offering.

I know some people use them as back ups or for "deep concealment" but I would never trust my life to an NAA .22 revolver. IMO the gun itself is more a range toy than a serious SD gun, and .22 ammo is just too unreliable both in the gun and it's terminal effects. The other possibilities (.25ACP and .32ACP) are AFAIK even less effective than the .380 and the guns they work in are not IMO sufficiently smaller than the LCP to make the trade off worth while.

YMMV of course.
 
OLD DOG,

The question is not which is a better weapon, but what can you carry at ALL TIMES? If it did not matter that a gun had to be concealed, then medium to large guns make a lot more sense, but if you get spotted, just whipping out your CCP may not cut it.
In Florida, it is called brandishing and it can get you arrested and almost certainly get your CCP suspended, maybe permanently.
Concealed guns beat being unarmed and trying to duke it out with someone anytime.
As for the theoretical giant, mad biker, meth head robber that you need a GLOCK 21 and spare mags for, try walking around in Florida with that rig on in June, July or August. Down here plain clothes cops usually wear their guns openly, but with a t-shirt saying police. Without that police label, you can attract all sort of unwanted attention.
Sometimes, you have to reach a practical compromise between what you would like to have (say a 20 gauge pumpgun with a light and dot sight attached) and a GLOCK 42 you can walk around all day without attracting attention.

Jim
 
I've been visited by violence, though, so I'm not denigrating anyone's personal choice, just wondering why a few ounces in weight or an inch or two in length makes so many compromise.
And this is important I think. I haven't been in any violence that I couldn't bluff my way out of being 6'2" and fairly broad of shoulder to boot. I'm also in the process of learning hand to hand with a local ex-PD officer. With that being said my pistol is my last line of defense in a confrontation and hope to God I'll never get there. I'm not trying to drag this through the mud and please don't read any of this as confrontational but I just want to help give a more complete picture of my choices since you do seem genuinely interested.

Now if I could pick my perfect carry pistol I would like something with the width of a LCP, weight and height of my RAMI, and length of P-07 or P-09 (sorry I'm not terribly well versed in the Glock product line otherwise I'd reference them). Width and height are for comfort and concealability, weight to manage recoil, and length for a nice sight picture. As far as I know there isn't a pistol out there that fits that description and I'm sure there is a very good reason for that since there are much more experienced and smarter men that I in the industry. Until something like that comes about I'm having to make one compromise or another and sadly being concealable is higher on the priority list than I'd like.
 
So please tell us how a sub-compact 9mm like the LCs9 wouldn’t work for you.

For me, an LC9 sized gun won't fit in the pockets of the pants I own. I know because my shootin' buddy has an LC9. I do have a Glock 36 that is a bit larger than the LC9 and it won't fit in my pockets either.

The 36 is saved for the few cold weeks we have when I'm not working, which allows me to wear a jacket and a shoulder holster. But that is rare.

Why do I choose to pocket carry? I'm essentially a mechanic of sorts that has to wear a tucked in shirt but no jacket. That alone isn't the problem, as I have to work on my knees, on my back, on my sides, and of course on my feet. My first carry gun and holster is/was a Taurus 85UL carried IWB. I found I could get by carrying that revolver in my pocket more successfully at work than carry it IWB.

Having a gun in a pocket puts that gun on my upper thigh. I can work for hours in weird positions with a small gun on my upper thigh, but I can't do that with a lump of gun anywhere on my waist. Same goes for working on things at my house. In the attic for the AC or underneath cars in the driveway.

Sure, drawing from the pocket in any of those positions is problematic. But I'm hoping that when I'm working on a customer's machine that I don't have to keep watching my back. Having a gun in my pocket is for the times in between working on machines whether for work or at home. Being able to upsize the gun and change to an IWB/OWB holster isn't something I can do readily unless I'm at home.

Of course, that's just me. Others have their own reasons.
 
golden writes:

If it did not matter that a gun had to be concealed, then medium to large guns make a lot more sense, but if you get spotted, just whipping out your CCP may not cut it.
In Florida, it is called brandishing and it can get you arrested and almost certainly get your CCP suspended, maybe permanently.

This is not accurate. The brief, open display of a normally-concealed handgun not in a rude or threatening manner does not constitute "brandishing" (which is actually known here as "reckless display" or "aggravated assault" depending on the circumstances.) The prolonged (read: not "brief") open-display of a firearm without any such handling violates a different statute, one prohibiting "open carry." Dale Norman was not charged with "brandishing" in my county when he was arrested for walking down a public street with a clearly-visible holstered firearm; he was charged with (and convicted of) unlawful open-carry of a firearm, a misdemeanor in Florida.

Also, there is no "CCP" in Florida in this context; it actually goes under the acronym CWFL. ;) But, yes, Florida remains one of few states still prohibiting general open carry.
 
An LCP might be laughable for that drill, but I was talking about self defense situations. Which typically means close quarters, one attacker, and 2-3 shots fired; all well within the capabilities of an LCP.

How long does it take you to get off 3 shots with a pocket carried LCP if you don't have a hand in your pocket?

Timing these kinds of things led to me abandoning pocket carry as my primary.
 
How long does it take you to get off 3 shots with a pocket carried LCP if you don't have a hand in your pocket?

Timing these kinds of things led to me abandoning pocket carry as my primary.
Pocket carry is sometimes "the only way" due to circumstances. Where it is at it's worst is sitting down.
 
Pocket carry is sometimes "the only way" due to circumstances. Where it is at it's worst is sitting down.

Obviously, that wasnt my point. My comment was geared to the thinking that a pocketed LCP is fine because of the 3 in 3 in 3 average, but you gotta be able to deploy the gun to make that work.

If ya gotta or want to pocket carry, great! There are zero circumstances in my personal life where I could only pocket carry vs something (even if it is just as small, like a .38) on the belt or belly band that would be easier to use*, should I need it.

*yes, a pocket gun is fast if your hand is in the pocket but I don't walk with a hand in the pocket 100% of the time and we cant depend on complete situational awareness, as much as we strive for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RPZ
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top