The search for accurate match loads for 9mm continues...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Will definitely try some of the Power Pistol. Online, it ships to my door for about $25 a pound. But only in 4lb container. Nearest store that carries it is 50 miles away and it's $24 a pound.

Some love Power Pistol and some hate it. It seems it is not the best powder for competition because of the sound and being flashy. It is probably not a good idea to start with a 4lb container.

If I move one day I will definitely miss my local supplier Bruno Shooters Supply. They have 1lb PP for $17.40, but I have to pay tax.
 
MIdsouth has free hazmat until midnight tonight when you order $125 worth of Alliant Powder.
1lb PP $22.09, 4lb $81.65
That is a good deal

I decided it was time to try out some Sport Pistol and picked up 4lbs. Just to round out the order and try something new, I also picked up 4lbs of E3
 
Power pistol is flashy and sort of loud but shoot some Longshot and you won't notice it:evil::D
 
Last edited:
Finally stopped by the only local sporting goods store that sells powder and they had Power Pistol in stock for $22.99 a pound. They also started carrying RMR bullets, so I bought some more 124gr JHPs to try again and a pound of Power Pistol.

Loading up a few recipes tonight to try tomorrow before my shift.

I have a match on Saturday so hopefully whatever I try tomorrow will prove to be acceptable (2" or better at 25yds and reasonable recoil). If not, the best factory ammo is the Remington UMC 115gr JHPs from Walmart for $29 for 100. So I can always just grab a box of those in a pinch.
 
Did 5.5gr behind 115gr XTPs, 115gr RMR RN, 124gr XTPs, and 124gr RMR JHPs. Did 5.9gr for 124gr XTPs, 115gr RMR RNs and 115gr XTPs. These are all for matches so pretty low power. Though I had to seat the 124gr RMR JHPs pretty deep to get them to plunk. I think they ended up at 1.080. Not sure if I can use these bullets with the Glock Gen 5 barrel anymore due to it's very shallow throat. They just don't have a profile that works very well with these new barrels. XTP is slightly better.
 
I have never tested the RMR 124gr JHP MPR rounds in 9mm, so I'm not sure what the best COL is. I have tested the The RMR 124gr TC FP matchwinner with a COL of 1.065" and the best grouping Power Pistol load 5.6gr at 1058fps out of a 3.9" barrel.

Good luck testing your loads.
 
I ended up loading the RMR 124 Gr MPR JHP @ 1.070 to 1.075 OAL. Works well for me.
 
I have never tested the RMR 124gr JHP MPR rounds in 9mm, so I'm not sure what the best COL is
This may help.

index.php
 
Got some range time in again today and have come to the conclusion that reloading for 9mm is pretty much a complete waste of time, money, and resources.

Went through about 6 new recipes using four types of bullets and two powders, as well as two more factory plinking flavors.

The 2nd most accurate load was the $8 a box of 50 Federal Brass 115gr RN from WalMart…

WNkq8xwTQMCSyco9Sk0ABQ.jpg

Only custom load that was better was 115gr XTPs over 5.5gr of Power Pistol...

CZloM6ERSAS6-oujoJBagg.jpg

And yes, Power Pistol is snappy! Much more so than any other powder I've tried. Very noticeable. But it did deliver best the accuracy so far of any previous powders.

But, the Federal stuff is dirt cheap and has better recoil. A box of 100 115gr XTPs is $17 at WalMart. 100 rounds of the Federal is $16. I think I'll go with the Federal ammo for my match this Saturday.

Oh, and I shortened the distance to 20yds for accuracy testing to eliminate as much human error as possible. Much more consistent results and the differences in ammo accuracy potential were much more obvious.
 
Thanks for the update, and sorry to hear that you feel loading 9mm is a waste of time, money and resources. I actually just loaded 50 of the RMR 124gr FMJ TC FP bullets with 5.6gr of Power Pistol, and my calculated cost was $5.76. I don't save as much loading 9mm when compared to 357sig, 40s&w, 45acp or 38/357, but there are still some savings. Reloading is a hobby for me, so the effort it takes is a positive, not a negative.

Good luck with your upcoming match on Saturday.
 
Got some range time in again today and have come to the conclusion that reloading for 9mm is pretty much a complete waste of time, money, and resources.

For some, this is a fact. I would entreat you to stick with it a bit longer. It’d be one of those awesome moments if you happened upon the perfect reload within 20-30 combinations, but there are a LOT of variables that come in to play.

Have you seen this project? https://ammosquared.com/gaatproject/

If you look at the surveys of the major competitions, most of the competitors reload. The predominate reloads are a coated bullet with a fast powder like Titegroup or N320.
 

Thanks for sharing this link. I watched a few of the videos and a trend that I saw was that the first shot was always low and definitely impacted the grouping. I have read about this before, but it was interesting to actually see it happening.

With my normal load testing I normally just shoot 5 rounds for a 5 shot grouping. When I retest certain loads to confirm accuracy or maybe for a longer distance test, then I would load 6 rounds, shoot the first round off target, and then the remaining 5 at the target for a 5 shot grouping.
 
Trey I might agree with lordpaxman. For the cost of manufactured 9mm for many it is a waste of time. Now for myself it is not. I produce 9mm for right around .10 cents a piece and I can't unequivocally say that my handloads are any more accurate or reliable than what comes out of a factory box. But I do know that my handloads are more accurate than many I've tried that do cost more. I could also add that I know my handloads could be more accurate than they are but I load so that I can use these rounds in a number of different guns and it's not tailored to any one particular gun. I load this way not just for the 9mm but also for the 380 and 45acp.

Next the two biggest reasons I reload, 1. because I enjoy it and find it rewarding. 2. it gives me something to do and fill time being that I am retired. It keeps the mind active too.
Just can't be fishing all the time!

What I dislike about reloading, the more I reload the more I want to shoot. The more I shoot the more I have to reload. The Circle! Only at some point we get to where we have to restrain ourselves for financial reasons otherwise I could shoot myself into the poorhouse!
 
Thanks for sharing this link. I watched a few of the videos and a trend that I saw was that the first shot was always low and definitely impacted the grouping. I have read about this before, but it was interesting to actually see it happening.

This is normally due to the gun not the ammo. What is happening is the slide closing on release is not the same as under fire (recoil return). This is more noticeable on a hard lockup barrels to slide fit. If done right there is no difference.
 
This is normally due to the gun not the ammo. What is happening is the slide closing on release is not the same as under fire (recoil return). This is more noticeable on a hard lockup barrels to slide fit. If done right there is no difference.

Correct. I could see they had different methods of releasing the slide while the gun was mounted on the ransom rest. I don't know how different the lockup is on my guns, but when trying for a small groupings, I just try to eliminate most of the variables. The big variable me is still there, but it is what it is.
 
One of the biggest impediments to accuracy with my striker-fired guns is the trigger. My G19 has a polished OEM (-) connector installed. That's the lightest and smoothest you can get and still stay legal for GSSF Stock division. Pull is a measured 4.5lbs.

Still, when shooting quickly and general plinking, the trigger feels great. When that same pistol is resting on a sandbag and you are modulating your breathing to maximize accuracy, that same trigger feels like it is very heavy, inconsistent, and is ruining shots.
 
This is normally due to the gun not the ammo. What is happening is the slide closing on release is not the same as under fire (recoil return). This is more noticeable on a hard lockup barrels to slide fit. If done right there is no difference.

So are you saying this only happens with certain guns? They were testing a Gen 3 Glock 19 and a Gen 5 Glock 19 and both had results where the first shot was always low.
 
Evidently I need a lot more practice with the red dot. Got a dismal 476 score and my G35 groups were noticeably tighter at the 5, 7, and 10 yard distances than the G19's. G35 has a Dawson fiber optic front sight and stock Glock rear. But groups with the red dot were better at the 15 and 25 yard distances.

Shot the Federal ammo in the G19 and then a box of my match loads in the G35, which was 165gr RMRs and 5.0gr of Ramshot Silhouette.
 
So are you saying this only happens with certain guns? They were testing a Gen 3 Glock 19 and a Gen 5 Glock 19 and both had results where the first shot was always low.

Can happen with any simi-auto if the lock up is not the same every time. New guns being tight are more prone to it. As they get used and loosen up settle down.
 
So are you saying this only happens with certain guns? They were testing a Gen 3 Glock 19 and a Gen 5 Glock 19 and both had results where the first shot was always low.

It generally only happens with some guns. As blue68f100 notes, it depends on if they lock up consistently. My Glock G19 does not appear do this, some of my other guns do it sometimes, and one gun does it all the time on the first shot.

Many Ransom Rest users will fire the first (hand cycled) round off target for this reason to avoid the first wild shot ruining their group.
 
Shot the Federal ammo in the G19 and then a box of my match loads in the G35, which was 165gr RMRs and 5.0gr of Ramshot Silhouette.

?165gr RMRs? I guess shooting with the Pres has it's advantages! I haven't seen these on RMR's pages yet. Or are these really 115?

If you happen to continue the 9mm quest, you may want to look at round nose profiles. In my guns, I can achieve a much longer COL with round nose, and in a few they group well enough. Actually, I'm not sure if it's a good group due to the loads, or a good group due to a conflux of movements that pushed would-be errant shots into a good group. At any rate, they're better than my current skill level.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top