Looks interesting. I really like my Security 9. Seems like 10 round Compacts are gaining a lot of interest/popularity.
https://www.ruger.com/products/security9/specSheets/3818.html
https://www.ruger.com/products/security9/specSheets/3818.html
May I ask what new and innovative features of this handgun do you find interesting?
I'm curious then, is it the actual handgun or it's performance in the marketplace that you find interesting?
Totally uncalled for.I thought the introduction of a new model was interesting. Sorry this is so confusing for you.
Im not sure what there is to be offended by in this thread, seems pretty clear to me the original poster likes his Security 9...that is reason enough to find a compact version interesting.Totally uncalled for.
It might be interesting for someone looking for both a compact/carry pistol and a companion for the PCC, who doesn't care for the SR9.
As do I, except my LC9 is the s type. I really like the ergonomics, feel and handling of the SR9. Except for the slide stop, all the controls are ambi, which as a lefty I really appreciate.I enjoy my sr 9 and LC9
Yes, but a lot of the discussion rightly points out that the normal price point, not the lower one, is no longer being served by Ruger. Foolish on their part it seems to me.Huh. Seems like an undue amount of stank in this thread. Not sure why.
I like my P30sk, and I can see this filling the same role at a much lower price point for someone wanting this type of offering.
I don't think I'm catching your meaning. Can you clarify please?Yes, but a lot of the discussion rightly points out that the normal price point, not the lower one, is no longer being served by Ruger. Foolish on their part it seems to me.
First off there are diehard Ruger fans
I bought one of the Security 9’s when they first came out. I liked the gun, but it just wasn’t my cup of tea
But just because you don’t find anything interesting about this new compact, doesn’t mean that someone else won’t.
The ‘s was for plural. Not single stack. As for as I know they don’t make a single stack model.I thought they were talking about the SR9, thus my reply. I’m all about single stack 9s. Got any pictures of the afore mentioned?
There are guns besides Ruger?
The gun will most likely sell for $299 in stores.Yes, but a lot of the discussion rightly points out that the normal price point, not the lower one, is no longer being served by Ruger. Foolish on their part it seems to me.
No, I'm saying they introduced an economy model with fewer features and discontinued the parent model which had been more expensive. More or less.I don't think I'm catching your meaning. Can you clarify please?
Are you saying that ruger's increase in price has limited the value?