Not that the whole conversation was meaningful or relevant anymore, but where in that page? I failed to see any data on hunting specific ammo sales figures. Are you sure you didn't misinterpret something now? The list you copied here is, according to the page:
"Most Common Bolt-Action Rifle Cartridges (By rifle chambering options)
This method of determining what’s most popular is to look at about 60 different models of rifles, and see what percentage of the rifles have each chambering as an option."
Actual sales figures for each caliber from major manufacturers would contain relevant information, this is just a list of available chambering options of a number of different bolt rifles. Not even of rifle sales figures, much less ammunition. Much like the "Hottest rifle cartridges" -list has been combined from number of google searches (SIC!) for each caliber name.
So please. You've made your point clear, you'd like 6.5CM to be here to stay and while it probably will, using this kind of "data" to "prove" it is more of a disservice to lots of people who might consider a rifle chambered in it but think twice because of the flood of ridiculous claims seen supporting it on discussion forums. And as I've already stated a couple of times, simply not to be mistaken for the people making them.
Much like I'm reluctant to mention that I have a Glock and collect AR:s (well, M16:s) anymore. Fanboys have stigmatized the whole topic with their fanaticism, as is currently happening with 6.5CM. If that hasn't happened already. All that manurebombing has done more damage to its reputation than years of experience can build. I've suggested 6.5CM to a number of people during last few years and I get "Yeah, but that'd make me look like a total [expletive]" a lot.
I wonder why.