Cosmoline
Member
Using an exotic ultra-mini-handgun for home defense, where concealment is pointless, strikes me as a horrible idea. These firearms are tricky to shoot in the best of circumstances. Furthermore you don't reduce overpenetration by getting a smaller sidearm--you simply use proper bullets at sufficient velocity. If you want to limit your overpenetration a better route would be to get an AR or other .223 platform with high velocity expanding rounds.
No firearm suitable for defense is safe to fire indoors. That's the whole point! You're not going to be using it for indoor target practice, you're going to be shooting some home invader in the chest with it. You don't want him to shoot back. Taking this action ALWAYS involves some risk, and is NEVER EVER SAFE. The best you can hope for is to limit the danger to the bad guy as much as possible, but there's no guarantee. You're firing lethal bullets inside your house. Absent a shooting range that's never going to be "safe." Which is why you only do it in the gravest extreme.
Yes, virtually everyone does share that opinion. I've never heard your selections offered as viable home defense choices.
safe to fire indoors
No firearm suitable for defense is safe to fire indoors. That's the whole point! You're not going to be using it for indoor target practice, you're going to be shooting some home invader in the chest with it. You don't want him to shoot back. Taking this action ALWAYS involves some risk, and is NEVER EVER SAFE. The best you can hope for is to limit the danger to the bad guy as much as possible, but there's no guarantee. You're firing lethal bullets inside your house. Absent a shooting range that's never going to be "safe." Which is why you only do it in the gravest extreme.
Well now, not everyone shares that opinion.
Yes, virtually everyone does share that opinion. I've never heard your selections offered as viable home defense choices.
Last edited: