7.62x39 home defense ammo

Status
Not open for further replies.
The thread is discussing 7.62x39 which is a much more powerful round. Just Youtube it - you can see 7.62x39 FMJ's going through 36" of gel, and doing all sorts of lovely things to model houses, cars, plate steel, bricks, cinder blocks, etc.

Again, not applicable to this discussion, because, if you've paid attention at all to this point, no one is advocating FMJ in any caliber for personal defense. Yes, I've seen a FMJ from an AK penetrate 16 inches of pine with enough remaining energy to be lethal on the other side. Yes, I've shot my AK through cinder blocks and concrete. And none of that matters. That picture that EVCMatt posted was originally took and posted here and on several other forums by me after some testing I did with some old black box Wolf through the Romanian AK I keep next to my bed for home defense. Believe it or not, some of us have done some testing and do take this stuff seriously enough to make the necessary considerations. And the AK is fine when properly loaded. That means not FMJs. Believe it or not, some defensive loads for the AK are more likely to suffer from under penetration--that Vmax round, for example, in everything posted on the Internet, looks to achieve the bare minimum amount of penetration necessary for defensive use. I intentionally avoided that load in favor of something that achieved a little more penetration, while still reliably expanding and fragmenting. Thats why I rock the Military Classic 124 gr JHP load from Wolf. That 14 to 16 inches of penetration is better suited to defensive use than the 10 to 12 inches I've typically seen displayed from the Vmax load, and yes, the uber-penetration of the FMJ.

And I don't see where the confusion lies. To me, it doesn't matter. Whether it is a Marine in Iraq, a SWAT officer in LA, or lil ol me in a rural American city of ~100,000--combat is combat. I've had SAWs and M16s going off around me indoors. It isn't fun. But compared to the headache and ringing ears, having the most effective tool for the job is a big comfort when unknown harm lies on the other side of a door. If bullets are passing each other in opposite directions, it's combat to me, and it doesn't even matter if any of the involved parties have a badge or uniform. All that matters to me is having the most effective tool for the job. Right now, nothing else in my inventory can match the amount of firepower the AK brings to bear in such a compact package, nor can anything else I own, to include my shotgun, offer the hit percentage and accuracy under duress that the AK does. I hit faster and more consistently with it (esp with the reflex sight on it). It has 30 rounds of an effective round that displays an acceptable amount of penetration and deformation for defensive use.

The court scene is a concern to anyone who has to defend themselves with a firearm. An AK will bring more scrutiny down on you. But if your shooting was legal, it was legal, and weapon choice has no bearing here. And at any rate, a good many of us would rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6. I am willing to assume to OP has considered this and decided that, like me, the risks are worth the reward. I have neighbors around me, and numerous roommates, none of which I'd like to see shot. This is not only an equipment issue (more ammunition selection than caliber or platform), but also a tactics issue. I am not clearing my entire house. I am posting up at a pre-determined tactically advantagous position that allows me to cover both entrances, as well as my room, the kitchen, and the entry way. And all my defensive firearms are equipped with a white light, which I have practiced in the dark with, to aid in target identification. The risk of collateral damage is always present when firing in an urban setting, but I have taken steps to minimize this risk while still acheiving the level of effectiveness I want. I have to assume the OP has again, considered his choices and his tactics, and simply wants to know what the best defensive ammunition available for the AK is. Regardless of whether you want to admit it or not, such defensively applicable ammunition does exist, and the AK is an awesome CQB platform when loaded with such ammunition. It may not be on the Magpul catolog, but it works very well...

To me, the shotty is the most underrated home defense weapon out there,

That's weird. All the tens of thousands of rounds of 12 gauge I've put through various Rem 870s (including my own), 1100/11-87s, and Benelli M1s have all led me to the singular conclussion that the shotgun is the most overrated defensive weapon available. In fact, the only thing a shotgun does better than a rifle, save for things that don't concern me (like breaching or bean bags), is shoot birds out of the air. For everything else, I'll take a rifle.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't be inclined to use my 7.62x39 for home defense. Over penetration is a real concern with most any centerfire rifle and a good number of pistol cartridges. A shotgun loaded with #4 shot might be a better option. I have an HK chambered in .45ACP. The carbines size is right and the cartridge is a good one, but it could still plant a round in my neighbors house. That's a real concern when living in tract homes, apartments, or condos.
 
Ben-

If a bullet disintegrates on a single sheet of drywall I don't trust it for reliable manstopping. You need SOME penetration to be effective.

I bet 9 of 10 AR15s and Mini 14s leaning next to bedposts are loaded with FMJ.

Make sure to call everyone and tell them to stick with JHPs in the house.

IMO a rifle is still a bad choice.

But you keep on tilting at that windmill.
 
This is two extremes which I do not advocate. Defend your family and home but don't be a moron about it...

Shotgun-YES
38 revolver - YES
357 revolver - HELL YES
9mm - OK
40 - YES
45 YES
Run outside with your firearm and cell to call police only if no loved ones are in the house - YES, IF it can be done

Using an AK, AR, "evil black assault rifle", single shot anything, .22/.25/.32/.380 - NO.

But that's just me and YMMV.



Big Bill
Quote:
If you live in the suburbs and kill an intruder with an AK, depending on which state or locale you live in, it is pretty much a guarantee for legal action - either from the local DA or the perp's family - even if it was a righteous kill.

Now of course in a SHTF scenario, all bets are off...
If you shoot ANYONE with a big, bad assault rifle, you're probably in trouble. You're probably better off (legally) to only use a single shot .22 on an intruder. Or, better yet, don't shoot anybody, run outside with your cell phone and call the police.
 
Wolf Military classic JHP is probably your best choice. Some of the US Made commercial JSP loadings seem to work fairly well as well, I have no experience or data on Russian made JSP's. I think its somewhat ignorant to say that they are crudely made and act like FMJ's without more testing. A lot of the Russian made JHP ammo is very good (eg Silver Bear 9x18 JHPs, 8m3 bullets .311, etc.)

As for those so obsessed with finding the magic round that vaporizes intruders yet does not penetrate a single sheet of dry wall, I think a Tazer is the best choice for them. You have 15 foot range (enough for most HD encounters), is guaranteed not to over penetrate, and has 100% stopping power on even the most PCP addled psychopath. Plus "stopped intruder with Tazer" is one of the few things that should never ever raise the suspicion of your local rabid anti-gun DA that so many of the posters here seem to have in their locale.
 
If a bullet disintegrates on a single sheet of drywall I don't trust it for reliable manstopping. You need SOME penetration to be effective.
See post #40, specifically the T223E load (55gr BTHP). 11-12" is adequate for civilian HD use, IMO. There are loads that penetrate more in gelatin, but they start to penetrate wallboard like 00 buckshot or 9mm JHP too.

The are rational reasons why law enforcement agencies have largely ditched pistol-caliber carbines and subguns in favor of .223 carbines shooting JHP's, though. One of those reasons is reduced danger to bystanders downrange (less chance of both overpenetration and ricochet); others are capacity and light recoil compared to the traditional shotgun.

I bet 9 of 10 AR15s and Mini 14s leaning next to bedposts are loaded with FMJ.
I doubt it, although FMJ would certainly be fine in a brick home or with no close neighbors.

Make sure to call everyone and tell them to stick with JHPs in the house.
That's one reason I'm posting in this thread, to undercut the "JHP's penetrate like FMJ's" misconception, because the corollary of that misconception would be "might as well use FMJ, it's cheaper."

IMO a rifle is still a bad choice.
Then don't use one. I only question the wholesale bashing of carbine users as ignoramuses or Rambo wannabes. Use what you shoot well, and choose a load that won't endanger your neighbors.

But you keep on tilting at that windmill.
I'm very much in the "use whatever works for you" category. You will not find me bashing shotguns or handguns for HD here, only pointing out that a lot of the arguments against small-caliber centerfire carbines are uninformed and have been debunked over and over for a decade and a half.

I'm not saying a carbine is best for everyone. I do think the choice should be based on facts, and not misinformed repetition of gunshop myth.
 
Can we get off the 223 debate and focus on the 7.62x39mm question that the OP originally posed?

BTW, whats wrong with the varmit rounds, seems to me like a round exploding maybe 3" into the chest is more than lethal, plus it should dump most of the energy into the target, seems like a good HD round by my standards then.
 
Back to 7.62x39mm, here's an article on the new 7.62 VMAX loads:

http://www.tacticalgunfan.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=553&Itemid=1

hornady_762_1_370_df.jpg


There is a big thread on 7.62x39mm ammunition choices over at Warrior Talk, here. The primary choices I see are Hornady VMAX, Wolf Military Classic 124gr 8M3 JHP, the very-expensive Cor-Bon JHP, and the unattainably expensive Glaser frangibles (if you buy enough of those to ensure functioning, you could buy a .223 AK or low-end AR).
 
Too bad there is not some sort of reduced velocity loading for this caliber. Maybe a JSP or SJSP at about 1000 to 1200 fps. Around 158 gr. Seems that would still be a potent enough round. Am I missing something here?

Yeah Spyke. They do make something like that actually. It's right in the range of the .38+p or a mildly loaded .357mag.

A 158gr bullet moving at 1000-1200 is a pretty known formula for putting down bad guys. And the .38/.357 is a 35cal bullet instead of a measly 30cal and comes with bullet selection that will reliably expand at that 1k-1.2k fps velocity. No need for an AK/SKS to fire it though.;)
 
back off on a tangent -
I think a Tazer is the best choice for them. You have 15 foot range (enough for most HD encounters), is guaranteed not to over penetrate, and has 100% stopping power on even the most PCP addled psychopath.
No, and I know it from personal experiance, no. Not 100%, and once the juice is turned off, the effects are over quickly. He rips the prongs out, you are stuck with a contact stun gun. Watched one guy take 4 taser shots and just get mad... bad juju. Useful for take down and run for civilian, not in your home/castle.

I'd like to try that Hornady V-Max, since I can't seem to get ahold of DoubleTap, looks good.
 
Expanding rifle rounds often penetrate less than handgun rounds, as the extra velocity from a rifle or carbine aids in expansion and/or fragmentation.

I recently bought some ammunition for one of my brothers and his family. I included some 7.62x39mm GA Arms SPs for home defense. I think their ballistic tips might be an even better choice, but I wasn't willing to pay 40% more for them. Really, it's irresponsible to use deeply penetrating, non-expanding ammunition, but other than that, the most responsible choice is to shoot enough practice rounds to hit your damn target when it's for real.

John
 
19-3 ben, I do own a 357 and feel perfectly comfortable with that as my primary HD option however if the situation arises where i need more than 5 shots then a 30 shot ak would fit the bil as a high firepower back up. That being said if I ever needed that sort of FP then in my mind the over penetration issue has gone out the window. I still dont want to shoot into my neighbors house though. It would be nice to have a tamed down 7.62x 39 (at least slowed down) with a heavy expanding bullet with similar properties as the 357 in a 30 shot rifle. Seems as if handloading is the only option and I dont like that idea for HD and who knows if it would even cycle the rifle as someone has already brought up.
 
go shoot a deer with a .308 and then think about what it's going to do coming out of a human after it also goes through a window or door.

aside from the over penetration of everything, i think i'd rather have something more manuverable as well. but if finances don't allow the purchase of a second gun i guess you have to work with what you have and buy something that will break up as much as possible on impact.

maybe something like this extreme shock?
http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/?productNumber=166588

http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/?productNumber=540880
 
EXTREAM SHOCKZZZ!!!!??!?!?!!??


No seriously, stay well away from that garbage.
 
If using 7.62x39 for indoor defense, the vmax are as good as it gets.

I seen the brass fetcher gel test and they stay within 12 inches of gel.
Anyone getting hit with one of these center mass is going to experience lights out very quickly. And, I don't think its going to exit a bad guy unless he has been on crack and weighs 75 lbs. I tested the double tapp vmax against water juggs and it reacts to water very nicely and human tissues are mostly water based. I don't see where these will over penetrate an average badguy
or not penetrate enough. I think its one of the best 7.62x39 carbine ammo alternatives for home defense. Don't miss your mark and you most likely will not have to worry about this zipping through your home.

By the way, in the video link below, I used a vmax 7.62x39 in the final shot.
It absolutely tore the water jugg a new one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGB5YB9f15Q
 
It would be nice to have a tamed down 7.62x 39 (at least slowed down) with a heavy expanding bullet with similar properties as the 357 in a 30 shot rifle.

No! This is *the opposite* of what you want, if (over)penetration is a concern. Lighter weight expanding rounds expand more and penetrate less because of higher velocity. Upping weight and reducing velocity will make them penetrate more deeply, at least, until you get to ridiculously low velocities.

John
 
I say go with the hornady. I use a carbine for home defense as well with 110 hornady tap in it. lighter recoil than my 12g, faster follow up shots, and 25 rounds instead of 7.

Hmmm, that's a no-brainer.

And I have fired a weapon indoors, and yes, without hearing protection. No, it does not deter me from still choosing a rifle as my weapon of choice for an indoor encounter. Most guns are loud enough that they all cross the "comfort threshold," but during these events, comfort will be the last thing on your mind.

I do plan on putting together a 10.5" 6.8spc carbine with a suppressor on it and using that for indoor purposes and maybe putting the 7.62 in the vehicle... Decisions decisions...

Edit to add. The wife has the 870 with an 18" barrel and 2 shot extender. She grew upon a farm and knows how to work a nailbarrel. so yeah, hornady.
 
Last edited:
first rule of home defense is to have a home thats defendable. Only thing going to get hurt with overpenetation in my home is a bird or my truck! bottom line is anything other then fine shot out of a shotgun is going to penetrate walls. Thats why you get a game plan for when someone comes into your house and practice it. You need to know when and where you can shoot and when and where you cant. It isnt worth a dammed if you shoot your own child trying to protect him.
 
19-3 ben, I do own a 357 and feel perfectly comfortable with that as my primary HD option however if the situation arises where i need more than 5 shots then a 30 shot ak would fit the bil as a high firepower back up. That being said if I ever needed that sort of FP then in my mind the over penetration issue has gone out the window. I still dont want to shoot into my neighbors house though. It would be nice to have a tamed down 7.62x 39 (at least slowed down) with a heavy expanding bullet with similar properties as the 357 in a 30 shot rifle. Seems as if handloading is the only option and I dont like that idea for HD and who knows if it would even cycle the rifle as someone has already brought up.

Oh I know. I was just being a smartass.:p You had said you hoped there was such a thing as a 158gr bullet at 1200fps, and that's exactly what .357 does.

Well, I spoke with Mike McNett from DoubleTap Ammo last year about his .38+p 158gr. hollow point (no longer in production). He said that out of an 16.5" levergun, they got 1350fps.
So it's still not a 30rnd capacity, but 9 rounds of that would be pretty big medicine. As you said, if you need more than that, you're way beyond worrying about penetration and nigh on time to call in for close air support.
 
It would be nice to have a tamed down 7.62x 39 (at least slowed down) with a heavy expanding bullet with similar properties as the 357 in a 30 shot rifle. Seems as if handloading is the only option and I dont like that idea for HD and who knows if it would even cycle the rifle as someone has already brought up.
A .30 carbine might be a good choice if you want a little less than 7.62x39mm in an autoloading carbine. I may be misremembering here, but I believe the late Jim Cirillo was a fan of that cartridge.
 
If I just had to use my rifle.....

http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/?productNumber=410492

My long gun is a 20 guage coach gun loaded with 3 buck. My back up is a .38 special. I don't worry about being "adequately armed" since I know how to shoot. :rolleyes: I don't need no stinkin' rifle in the house.

One of my SKSs loaded with the Glaser would be good medicine, I just prefer the shotgun for in the house. It points naturally and I shoot birds with it, lots of shooting and familiarity with that gun. I'm more comfortable with my abilities at short range with it. Ditto my handguns, shoot 'em all the time, even hunt with some of them.

I have a tacticooled SKS, but I think the sporting stock version would be better even though I have a laser on the folding stock paratrooper. I just prefer traditional stocks, feel right.

I do NOT worry about ANY rifle ammunition cycling in my SKSs. I'd shoot 6 rounds out of it and if it fed and ejected those normally, I'd be good to go. Those things do NOT jam. They're not 1911s, after all.
 
Last edited:
If I just had to use my rifle.....

http://www.midwayusa.com/viewProduct/?productNumber=410492

My long gun is a 20 guage coach gun loaded with 3 buck. My back up is a .38 special. I don't worry about being "adequately armed" since I know how to shoot. :rolleyes: I don't need no stinkin' rifle in the house.

One of my SKSs loaded with the Glaser would be good medicine, I just prefer the shotgun for in the house. It points naturally and I shoot birds with it, lots of shooting and familiarity with that gun. I'm more comfortable with my abilities at short range with it. Ditto my handguns, shoot 'em all the time, even hunt with some of them.

I have a tacticooled SKS, but I think the sporting stock version would be better even though I have a laser on the folding stock paratrooper. I just prefer traditional stocks, feel right.

I do NOT worry about ANY rifle ammunition cycling in my SKSs. I'd shoot 6 rounds out of it and if it fed and ejected those normally, I'd be good to go. Those things do NOT jam. They're not 1911s, after all.
if I wanted to be "adequately prepared" i'd have personal nukes.

Because we can't really go there, I try to prepare with the tools available for as many probabilities as are possible.
 
Ben, I saw a 22 Long Rifle bullet from a 4" pistol zip through three walls in a home. Stopped by a 4x4 and buried so deeply we couldn't find it without serious digging. What would a 223 have done?

I said that I THINK any CF rifle is bad choice in an urban dwelling because of over penetration. You're DAMNED RIGHT that's a generalization but it's still a correct assessment and I stand by that statement.

You, of course, are free to disagree although I don't understand why it seems so important to you to do so.
Well, you are wrong. That's why.
 
I've seen the results of a light weight, high speed bullet (130 grain .270) that was negligently discharged inside. It was fired into a normal plaster ceiling, broke into two fragments before exiting the ceiling/attic insulation, struck the attic ceiling, and did not penetrate the roofing shingles. Testing from various sources also verifies that properly selected rifle ammunition penetrates no more, and usually considerably less, than handgun and shotgun rounds.

IOW, everyone in this thread who screams that using lighter-weight expanding rifle ammunition is terribly dangerous to one's neighbors has absolutely no clue what they're talking about.

John
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top