We are going to have to give up something

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sgt.Murtaugh

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
245
I am pretty sure the NRA is meeting with lawmakers now, and over the past few days. In my opinion, the lawmakers said they would support the NRA and vice-versa until something like this happens, in which case the NRA would have to support some sort of legislation to control firearms. Let me be clear that this is strictly MY OPINION and nobody else's. Please don't argue my opinion. Feel free to state your own, but don't tell me I'm wrong unless you have proof. I have never seen the NRA go this quiet and dark for this long; It worries me as an NRA life-member.

Since I am under the firm belief that we are going to have to concede something, my question is what do you think it will be? I have them ranked in order of likelihood as follows.

1. more heavily regulated private sales? i.e. close the "gunshow loophole"
2. More obstacles to buying a gun. i.e. psych evaluations, required yearly training, etc.
3. renewed assault weapons ban
4. "high capacity magazine" ban
5. online gun sales (doubtful)

*A quick note about the first one - Personally, I always use an FFL to sell my guns privately because I want to xfer ownership and not have the police knocking on my door if buyer decides to commit a crime with that gun. To me, it's worth the transfer fee to do it cleanly. I realize you don't have to do this and it's your legal right not to. This is simply the way I choose to do things. This first item wouldn't affect me as much as the other ones would.

Items 2 and 3 may be flip-flopped in my mind as well.

Of all the things in my lifetime that have threatened our 2A rights, this one worries me the most. My friends in the gun industry have even said they have never seen anything like it and they too are worried.

Any thoughts on this? anything you can say to console me?
 
Arm Teachers

I disagree we have to give up something. It is the liberal, anti-gun types that have to give something up.

Arm the teachers. It isn’t politically correct but isn’t it time we set politics aside and start thinking about realistic ways to ensure the safety of our children? Arm the teachers. Stop the politically correct insanity that allowed Columbine, Virginia Tech and Sandy Hook.


http://thegr8goat.wordpress.com
 
My friends in the gun industry have even said they have never seen anything like it and they too are worried.

IMO Its on par with the Cleveland School Massacre (Stockton, CA) that got the first AWB enacted.

The best solution I saw was better inter-agency data sharing.
 
Biden is purportedly (Fox news) going to be handed the oversight on this issue. I think that's good news. It essentially shows that it's not important and nothing is expected to happen. It's an old WH tactic of a time-buying shell-game.
 
I disagree we have to give up something. It is the liberal, anti-gun types that have to give something up.

Arm the teachers. It isn’t politically correct but isn’t it time we set politics aside and start thinking about realistic ways to ensure the safety of our children? Arm the teachers. Stop the politically correct insanity that allowed Columbine, Virginia Tech and Sandy Hook.


http://thegr8goat.wordpress.com
I actually suggested this to some friends the other day and that laughed in my face. My suggestion was having 2, highly trained and certified, volunteer teachers (preferably ones who already have a CCW) carry (or have access to) firearms on school grounds. Their identities would remain anonymous and they would have to undergo yearly training/certification to keep the responsibility. Obv, cops would be better suited for this but most cities don't have the manpower to stick a cop in every single school in the city.

on the other hand, this would never happen and I could see why parents wouldn't go for it. It's just my humble suggestion upon many others that may or may not be viable.
 
We are going to have to give up something
No, we do not HAVE to give up anything. We do HAVE to ensure that the dialog is focused on root cause analysis and on identifying actions that tie off against root causes.

Entering into battle because battle is expected, without knowing the terrain or knowing the desired end goal, is rarely a good idea.
 
My idea of compromise, IF they CAN pass an AWB, I want an NFA '34 repeal stuck on it.

THATS a compromise. Not we-give-they-get. Thats not a compromise.
 
100% tax credit for purchase of a gun safe
holy....jeez! that's a brilliant idea and rather creative as well. Let's take it one step further and say you get a tax credit for undergoing certain safety and marksman training.
 
I don't think we have to give up anything. I think we have to come out strong as the champions for reform of mental healthcare delivery. But I've been up all night defending that I'm not a damned troll and I've got to go to work now.

I think if we play this right we can actually come out stronger. But we have to be the good guys. We cannot take Neanderthal positions.

You want to see what I think search my user id and look for my posts the last 24 hours. But I can't do any more now.

But we do not have to give anything up, and we do not have to be confrontational.

We have to become the champions of improving mental healthcare.
 
No, we do not HAVE to give up anything. We do HAVE to ensure that the dialog is focused on root cause analysis and on identifying actions that tie off against root causes.

Entering into battle because battle is expected, without knowing the terrain or knowing the desired end goal, is rarely a good idea.
I respectfully disagree with you. There will be some sort of restrictive legislation that comes from this. We certainly will not be GIVEN any more freedom.
 
My child (13) asked what happens when an armed teacher goes crazy. I told her the other armed teachers would shoot the crazy one. She thought about it and said that the crazy teacher probably would do it if they thought they might get shot.....Seems common sense is still alive in this country. Even if just isolated pockets...

LNK
 
holy....jeez! that's a brilliant idea and rather creative as well. Let's take it one step further and say you get a tax credit for undergoing certain safety and marksman training.
hold the applause - just throw money

federal program similar to the Flight Deck Officer program where administrators and teachers can be trained and armed

100% tax credit for firearms training

federal program to upgrade police firearms ranges IF at least 20 hours per week 5 of those on weekends and 5 in weekday evening hours is availble for public use at a rate of no more than $15 per hour
 
No compromise, write to your representatives and senators and tell them (professionally) that further gun control and stripping more of our rights will not solve anything. There are a few example letters on THR that people have written.
 
The most despairing thing about it is that we will ultimately have no say in the matter....

We can of course, at the next election cycle, get off our butts and remember who our friends were.
 
We are going to have to give up something

Oh,..OK.

I guess we'll give up something and have an instant background check before we can buy a gun.

Oh, wait, we already gave that up.

Alright, lets give up being able to buy a gun by mail, and have to fill out federal paperwork. (Gun Control Act of 1968)

Oh, we already gave that up also.

Well, we can submit to an "assualt weapon ban", and see how that goes.

Um, hey, we did that too, and it didnt change anything, but at least it had a sunset date.


We're always asked to "give a little", but many that want us to give keep admitting that they know it wont really change that much, "but we have to start somewhere". Well, if what they are asking for is the start, where do they plan to end? I have an idea. Maybe if all the guns are kept in a central location, and you can go check them out to go to the range or go hunting, since its too dangerous to have them at home or "on the streets" whatever that means. (none of my guns have ever been "on the streets", that I'm aware of) Guess what they'd be asking us to give up when keeping guns in a central location didnt work, even if the guns used in a crime weren't kept at that safe location?

The old story about throwing one passenger off the sleigh to the wolves to appease them not working, as once you give in, they only want more, is really true. We've already given in to many "common sense" restrictions, yet they continue to want more when what they asked for didn't have the result they desired.
 
The most despairing thing about it is that we will ultimately have no say in the matter....

We can of course, at the next election cycle, get off our butts and remember who our friends were.
Executive Order will prevent us from having a voice. I could see Obama doing it. He's already done it.
 
Oh,..OK.

I guess we'll give up something and have an instant background check before we can buy a gun.

Oh, wait, we already gave that up.

Alright, lets give up being able to buy a gun by mail, and have to fill out federal paperwork. (Gun Control Act of 1968)

Oh, we already gave that up also.

Well, we can submit to an "assualt weapon ban", and see how that goes.

Um, hey, we did that too, and it didnt change anything, but at least it had a sunset date.


We're always asked to "give a little", but many that want us to give keep admitting that they know it wont really change that much, "but we have to start somewhere". Well, if what they are asking for is the start, where do they plan to end? I have an idea. Maybe if all the guns are kept in a central location, and you can go check them out to go to the range or go hunting, since its too dangerous to have them at home or "on the streets" whatever that means. (none of my guns have ever been "on the streets", that I'm aware of) Guess what they'd be asking us to give up when keeping guns in a central location didnt work, even if the guns used in a crime weren't kept at that safe location?

The old story about throwing one passenger off the sleigh to the wolves to appease them not working, as once you give in, they only want more, is really true. We've already given in to many "common sense" restrictions, yet they continue to want more when what they asked for didn't have the result they desired.
I don't know how it is in your state, but in TX you can buy a gun privately without passing a background check.
 
We don't have to support or compromise on anything. The politicians are going to do what they want to, regardless of what the citizen's want (remember Obamacare?). The firearms ban is going to pass, the NRA and pro-gun crowd are going to compromise anyway, even though we are the huge majority in this country, and we are going to have our rights restricted.

A big reason for this is because we have been catering to the vocal anti-gun minority since the 60's when we first let them get their foot in the door.

Notice how everything the politicians are talking about had absolutely no relevance whatever in the Connecticut shooting? "Assault weapons" and "gun show loopholes" are completely 100% unrelated to what happened in Connecticut.

Now it's time for me to put on my gun, open carry for all to see, take my daughter to school, on school property, where she always gets out of the driver's seat, I get out and hug her and move to the driver's seat myself, and then finish some Christmas shopping.
 
Executive Order will prevent us from having a voice. I could see Obama doing it. He's already done it.
How exacly would that work - and EO could only be used to change the way an exisiting law is implemeted and executed

He's president not king
 
I am not going to "give up" anything. I will fight any new restrictions the best ways I know how. I am not willing to compromise, because it's not a compromise if all that happens is we give up something.

If a thief tells me he wants to steal $100, and I say no, so he suggests we compromise at $20, he's still stolen $20. That's why any "reasonable regulation" the GC group advocates is not a compromise.

I like the idea for tax breaks for training or gun safes!
 
100% tax credit for purchase of a gun safe
As much as I would like that, we already fund too many things with tax dollars.

We have given in many things over the years. None of it has made us safer or reduced crime. In fact, just the opposite is true.

Stand up and fight for your gun rights and quit giving up so easily.
 
I don't know how it is in your state, but in TX you can buy a gun privately without passing a background check.

True, I believe its that way in many, if not most states, but to buy from a dealer there is paperwork and the check, which was something that we were told was going to make a difference, and we gave in to. I'm not for making all private sales go through a dealer, as some states do. So far, I haven't heard about any mass murderes buying from idnividuals when they couldnt get a gun from a dealer, though some have stolen them, which wouldnt be affected in any way by further restrictions on private sales.

I'm not totally opposed to what laws are on the books right now, just making the point that we're always asked to give, then we end up needing to give more. I don't see the end of us being asked to give having an end.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top