How about instead of just calling someone "silly" and engaging in ad hominem attacks, you actually offer some reasoning of your own.
Here is an example of reasoning:
Statement 1.
A hand grenade is an item that has been banned from civilian ownership.
Statement 2:
Obtaining a hand grenade is very difficult.
Statement 3:
If guns were banned from civilian ownership, obtaining a gun would be very difficult.
How is that "silly"? Is there a fault in the reasoning? Do you have a logical counter argument?
Or, is the extent of your ability to talk about this subjct limited to calling someone a close minded person who can't think for himself?
I hope you can offer better than that.
At what point in time were tens of millions of hand grenades owned by American citizens?
At what point in time were hand grenades that could be used thousands, or tens of thousands, of times over a period of decades owned by tens of millions of American citizens?