Uhh, before you get angry and insult the man, go back and read his post again. He's saying the dealership is BSing you -- telling you that it was a corporate decision, when the company appears to have no such policy, presumably because the dealer senses it will not go over well with you if he admits that it was his decision.Well Mr Buck you can call BS all you want. Is there some reason you think I would fabricate a story about my JD dealership being anti-gun?I'm throwing the BS flag on that one - the dealer's copping out and pretending it's someone else's choice.
I use two JD dealers in New Mexico - neither of them have a "corporate sign" banning guns in the dealership.
The dealerships are independently owned franchises - corporate JD doesn't tell them how to run their dealerships on issues like that.
noticed a huge 30.07 sign on the front door... told the manager I won't do business with them as a direct result of that sign... I'd rather support businesses that won't discriminate against my Glock.
Explain that their sign is prejudicial and assumes that law abiding citizens can't be trusted and that real criminals won't pay any attention to it anyway.
I have come to the conclusion that a 30.07 sign in Texas is roughly the equivalent of a "no Ethnic Basques" sign. The sign has just about zero effect in that there aren't a lot of Basque people wandering around Texas, but it reveals interesting information about whoever had it put up.
...
It is also generally offensive in the "I'm not Basque but I don't like bigotry" sense.
Absolutely but when corporate says this OUR policy, you are kind of stuck with it. Illinois is a relatively new comer to the whole carry issue. A memo was issued two years ago. I think it would take a bunch of franchise owners to get the policy changed if that's even possible. The decision makers think it's going to be the wild west but it really is not that much of an issue. Yes things should go up the ladder to the top but when the founder is anti-gun, no chance.The "my franchise agreement made me do it" argument isn't really relevant from a customer perspective. The customer sees the business as a single entity even though as a franchise operation there may in fact be two or more distinct business entities involved. All of that stuff about franchise agreements and contractual obligations is behind the curtain. You know it because you are involved in the businesses. As far as a customer is concerned, feedback they give you ("take the sign down or I'm never coming back") should be passed up the chain to a decision maker whether that individual is associated with the franchisee or franchisor. A franchisee is seen as an agent of the franchisor just as a manager is an agent of an owner, and customers expect there to be a line of communication back from the stores to the decision makers.
I think Papa John's has great pizza. I will not stop going there because of a sign. Not that big of a deal to me.
If I own a business that's a franchise and it cost me 1.5 million dollars to start the business, a 50K franchise fee and 5% of my sales to the corporation BUT I have to sign a franchise agreement that says I cant even buy ONE napkin from anybody else even if I run out and I have to post no gun signage am I anti-gun or anti-2nd amendment?
What are the chances that the manager told the corporate office about one person?
IL Guns said:Alright I will tell you that I have taught my managers to show the customer the signage and ask them to leave nicely. We do not have open carry in IL and to be bluntly honest I don't want to post the signage but have to. If you are concealed carrying, keep it CONCEALED.
I wouldn't have bought the franchise in the first place if there was flagrant racism. Plus how would I know you're Jewish? An added bonus is this is something that is rather new to my State. Like I said KEEP IT CONCEALED. It's really quite two separate things and not a good comparison at all.So you will refuse to sell to the Jews because the C.E.O. said not to.