Cobalt, sorry I didn't catch that info earlier, but thanks again for clarifying. I appreciate the info about manufacturing dates.First, the 2000 RR is unmarked as to where it was made. I assumed USA but It does not say made in USA on the gun, nor say made in China. I suspect the packaging would have said where the parts were from or where it was assembled. I commented at the time I took it apart that I was disappointed in the quality of the parts used to assemble it as compared to the China built ones. The gun, resealed and oiled, was only good for about 170 fps! This was due to the poor quality of the barrel- it was so badly made that light could be seen through the tubing seam. I tried to photograph it but the photo leaves much to be desired as far as clarity, but you can see a glow of light- and that glow is coming through the seam. Then there was the spring- it was made w/unground ends and it had fewer coils and less spring rate than the China guns use. A real disappointment. The bright spots were the trigger, which was made sans beartrap rack and the plunger tube is marginally stronger than new production tubes.
Except or a few special edition guns like the ca. ~ 2015 Daisy Red Ryder 75th Anniversary model which was made in the USA, the change to "Made in China" and "Made in USA" happened as early as 2006. This is going by a thread on the subject of the RR being made in China..
ETA There was also this (Dec., 2009): "There were some marked "Made in USA with Chinese parts", [some marked] "Made in China", and some unmarked." So it would appear there was a lot of overlap of older vs. newer stock Daisy BB guns in the supply chain.
I will post a better photo of the stocks for comparison later tonight or tomorrow. Or, if you prefer I could mail you a life-size kraft paper tracing of the stock. Let me know which you'd prefer.
And thank you for the offer to cut down the OD of my 499 barrel. I will keep this in mind.
I'm fine w/discussing sights here, so unless the mods disagree, have at it!My problem is that my eyes won't focus on both front and rear sight and target. So... it's a bit of a guess. Thinking about a scope mount or peep sight. I have limited experience with scopes, however it's been better than open sights. I have read that peep sights can help old eyes like mine. I
Would appreciate input as to scope choices appropriate BB guns.
Thx!
Measuring the two guns (105 & 1938B) externally, there appears to be a difference in shot tube length of 2-7/8", which would put the OAL of the 105 shot tube liner at 8". I don't have a 105 apart atm to get more precise but suffice to say the 499 shot tube will be plenty long enough for the 105.what is the length difference between the 105 and the RR?
Then you'll need to write a paper on why you think the 499 has been so successful, in a condensed form of course.Hi LW!
The sights are VERY useful, especially in light of no available plug and play open sights being made for the 499. I just hope the 499 is accurate at this astronomical-for-what-it-is MV. If it is, I'll be stoked. I didn't get out w/it today to shoot any targets but tomorrow I will for sure- even if it's only one.
So does that make the #25 the best compromise if you want a repeater?In a nutshell, it's mostly in the shot tube. Along with having a more precise barrel, its design is such that there's no excess loss of pressure through the ancillary ports that are in the Red Ryder and model 25 shot tube assemblies. The model 25 makes up for a portion of these inherent losses by having a slightly smaller barrel ID, but it's still not as efficient as the 499 shot tube assembly. Then there's the lack of a shot tube in the 499, not needed because it's a single shot muzzle loader- and being a single shot is the one major downside to the 499/RR hybrid. But if you're going to make a repeater, the shot tube is a necessary evil, given the design parameters of the Daisy lever action BB gun.