Status
Not open for further replies.
Untill I was around 60 years old I never owned a gun that was made to be used against people (Self Defense/Home protection). I never thought of guns that way. Every gun I owned were for Hunting/Target Shooting. Never did I think I would ever need a gun for that reason. 45 years of owning guns I never kept a loaded gun in the house . Just didn't. Now I keep 3. What in the **** Happened. ==== I Used **** cause I can't spell Heck.

Funny thing is the violent crime and murder rates were higher 45 years ago versus today.
 
More cleanup work done to remove comments/posts that do not relate to firearms.

Fair warning. There will be no more edits/deletions without infractions on this thread. THR is firearms focused. Discussions about general problems with our society or government are not on topic.
 
I dont think you can objectively compare "today" with "past".

Its just diffrent times, diffent moral codes and diffent general stress level.
In last years/decades we, regardless in which country, had to deal with new infuences and threats.
That also means more sources of stress
There is also much more ppl (generally) everywhere, meaning its not like old times when everybody knew theirs neighbors and there was some sort of local "social credit" (like "oh, thats old Bills kid going to hunt squirrels" instead "i never saw this guy and he have gun")

For example - there wasnt much of change in Czech gun laws in past 30 years and in that time there was huge changes in crime count in generall.
But gun crimes?
It keeps declining (but now its on such a low level that even one gun crime means like 30% of all gun crimes in year)
Absolute majority dont need and dont feel need to have gun (there is about 330k gun owners in Czech, including game keepers, per almost 11 milion citizens)

Is it because gun laws?
Not quite, i would say.

Till revolution in 1989 there was a big presence of Warsaws (soviets) pact soldiers and when they had to move out... they "lost" A LOT of theirs firearms (and other equipment). They were litterally changing Akms for packs of cigarets or goods valuable in theirs country.

After revolution there was a lot of illegal, untracable weapons, a lot of "revolutionaries", a lot of "broken dreams" and a lot of crime. We dont talk about that much, but it was quite a wild land. Firm communists hand was gone and ppl wasnt sure how to look at "new" LE organizations

Now i can and have legally few weapons and i carry... pepper spray most of the time. Don't get me wrong, i like to carry my gun and it just feels right on my belt, yet there is not really reason. I know its absolutely different view than in US and somebody will say that i will regret it when suddenly a psycho with fullauto will jump form bushes, but that chance is here much more slimer and more likely i will be engaged in some citizen dispute where gun will be more a burden

Just wanted to point on fact that gun laws, gun restriction and its effects are much more complex and non-snad-alone topic
I do get that.

Gun crime is low, crimes where guns are used are low, even in cities! However they DO attract media attention. Generally speaking, as a citizen, taking a gun to an incident is an escalation, unless there are already firearms present. I was a Police officer here from the 80's to the 2000's. In the mid 80's to late 90's armed robberies were a 'thing' with firearms, they died off after that. Then there were replica's, knives, threats, then blood filled syringes, and things. Firearms offences, unless related to some bikies, became a thing of the past. The current drug issues have made youth crime, robberies using other means, more prevalent again (here, that it a problem of our own creation, with children's rights, the lack of parental rights, and the namby pamby system).

The chances of an idiot with a full auto rambo gun, here, are small! As I live semi-rural, the chances of an armed person trespassing are slightly higher, but most of those are idiots!

When you look at the stats in America, and take away suicides (which is a dumb thing to add into stats aimed at violent crime) you see much the same thing, robbery by other means is far higher than firearms use.

Murders with firearms, in USA is actually static, by the FBI stats>> https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u....019/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-8.xls
That is around 10,000 a year, in a population over 325 MILLION.

Violent crimes are fairly large, but firearms use is not as high as you would expect, with opportunity weapons (a knife, a piece of pipe), featuring in more:
(from https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2019/crime-in-the-u.s.-2019/topic-pages/violent-crime )
Information collected regarding types of weapons used in violent crimes showed that firearms were used in 73.7 percent of the nation’s murders, 36.4 percent of robberies, and 27.6 percent of aggravated assaults. (Weapons data are not collected for rape.) (See Expanded Homicide Data Table 7, Robbery Table 3, and the Aggravated Assault Table.)

Whilst not saying America does not have a huge problem with its gun culture, violence, and a weird way of thinking about gun 'rights', perception, and reality, for both side of that argument seem a long way from each other.

They need to meet in the middle.

In Australia we have given up some 'rights' in exchange for some 'peace'; the logical was taken, with the illogical, people in the middle of cities don't REALLY need semi-automatic, high capacity firearms, generally. Rural people did/do need reasonable capacity pump/semi-auto shotgun/s, rifles, do need faster access to firearms, however, 10 shots is a comfortable upper limit, 5 shots would be better than nothing. I really liked some of the firearms I surrendered in the buybacks, I do get that it hurts to give up something you've had.

We need to address the fear of those never exposed to firearms, and firearms safety. We need to be truthful about the balance between risk, and freedom. We need to be truthful about incidents, accidents, and the lies that lie within statistics. We need to stop putting up more barriers, creating more legislation, just because it play well in the big cities. We are being managed, the politicians look for scapegoats, especially to cover their failure, firearms control is one of those scapegoats.

We need to ensure WE don't somehow give them an opportunity, that we don't stuff up!

In Australia I believe we went too far, we missed the middle ground, and the logical position; that is true of so much of the Government intrusion in our lives.

And sticking to topic, this is all about firearms, firearms safety, firearms ownership. We are lucky we can own firearms, we can use firearms, we can discuss firearms (just read caution above). I am not referring to political parties, just to facts. We must ensure we don't threaten other with firearms, be aware some feel threatened by firearms, we must show old world courtesy. :D:D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In Australia we have given up some 'rights' in exchange for some 'peace'; the logical was taken, with the illogical, people in the middle of cities don't REALLY need semi-automatic, high capacity firearms, generally. Rural people did/do need reasonable capacity pump/semi-auto shotgun/s, rifles, do need faster access to firearms, however, 10 shots is a comfortable upper limit, 5 shots would be better than nothing. I really liked some of the firearms I surrendered in the buybacks, I do get that it hurts to give up something you've had.

That is the problem with gun control, in a nut shell. You gave up "rights", for a "peace" that, objectively, never comes, so you gave up your rights for nothing. (Maybe not) obviously, but the "you" is not referring to the OP, but people in general.

"Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
 
Whilst not saying America does not have a huge problem with its gun culture, violence, and a weird way of thinking about gun 'rights', perception, and reality, for both side of that argument seem a long way from each other.
This is my point.
You spent the previous five paragraphs proving how firearms crime is down, and murder rate is actually low in America per capita.

Then you act like there is a huge problem with our gun culture, and we need to change it.


There isn’t. Your perception is skewed.

How can having many, many, seriously a lot, more firearms than the rest of the entire world and still having lower murder rates be a “bad thing”.

Perception.

You have the facts. You got them yourself. But exterior influences mold your perception. Advertising, news stories, movies, even sitcom scripts mold your being. Most times without you/we/us realizing it.

America has a problem with its guns culture because the news said so. But the facts tell a different story.

We need to address the fear of those never exposed to firearms, and firearms safety. We need to be truthful about the balance between risk, and freedom. We need to be truthful about incidents, accidents, and the lies that lie within statistics. We need to stop putting up more barriers, creating more legislation, just because it play well in the big cities. We are being managed, the politicians look for scapegoats, especially to cover their failure, firearms control is one of those scapegoats.

See, you get it.
Sensationalized news stories of our “mass shooter problem” to cover up the fact that the authorities can’t, don’t or won’t do their jobs.

The last three incidents in the news were conducted by individuals that had been under investigation multiple times. Report to authorities by concerned citizens. And were bat scat crazy.

We can’t be governed like we are all crazy.

“If you see something, say something.” doesn’t work if the .gov doesn’t do its job.

When the .gov does it’s job, it will be late anyway. It’s up to the citizens to provide their own safety. With the proper tools. Even if some humans have an irrational fear of them.

It’s amazing to see the flash mob robberies and think that five is enough. Maybe thirty isn’t either, but five is not. Imagine if each person only punched you in the face once.

How long until Aussies are turning in long knives?:(

How long for US?:uhoh:

Not long, if we accept their premises. Not very long if we let them change our perception of what is normal or not, what is an acceptable level of risk or not.
No man can assume my risks, thus they don’t get to tell me what is “safe”.
If we can be lied to with numbers, we can be lied to with words. It easier to have something else make my “super dangerous” world “safer”.
The humans saying they can make you safe, are lying.
The stress comes when we realize nothing can do that, not even really good, multiple volume, highly sophisticated laws.
Laws like, Don’t murder.

You make you safe. We are responsible for our own safety, laws, authorities, officers, or not. With the tools effective for the task. More firearms aren’t more dangerous. Statistics prove it, despite the perception propaganda reported repeated around the world.
 
I consider myself lucky. I grew up in the age when the veterans of World Wars were still here, when you could own a shotgun, or rifle, without a licence. That was a time when you could buy some .22lr, or .410 from the corner shop in rural Australia.

I dont think you can objectively compare "today" with "past".

Its just diffrent times, diffent moral codes...

Quite probably so.

28F6B983-442F-4A37-8515-24D6E2D4B56B.jpeg

I'm not sure if this was the thread that described having "gun racks in the backs of our trucks" - there are so many, and it appears to be a popular trope - but times change.

We tend to wax lyrical and romanticize our perception of how firearm ownership was in the past - but that's it, it's just the past.

Things die.

Things change.
 
Last edited:
And this morning, I read an op-ed piece by an historian (African-American) linking our country's "relaxed gun laws" to basically, institutionalized racism ("this country was founded upon") and the need for White Americans to keep Black Americans in check -- she actually came right out and stated gun-ownership in this country is directly related to "white replacement theory" -- apparently, yet another reason Americans buy guns.

When gun-control efforts become about fighting white supremacy -- which, if you're paying attention, is what's coming out of the Buffalo murders -- Houston, we have a problem.

That's pretty funny because at some point in the last 5 years I read an article from an "African-American" author that made the opposite point, that gun control is institutionalized racism and was implemented in order to ensure that White Americans could keep Black Americans in check. If I remember correctly the author posited that the first forms of gun control were passed shortly after the Civil War in the south by White ex-slave owners who feared the recently released slaves would take up arms and exact revenge for their inhuman treatment. This argument somewhat makes sense, however there is limited historical evidence to support it, and I just don't have that kind of time.
I do love how the loonies can't even seem to agree with each other.
 
He has told me, that they tell him in China they celebrate “safety” similar to how we celebrate freedom
Because they have no freedom, they are told what to celebrate. I won't pretend to know what private firearm ownership is like in China, but I'd imagine it's virtually non-existent. Oppressed populations are typically deprived of the means of combatting oppression as the first step.

Whether we've gained safety at the expense of freedom is hard to quantify simply because of varying perspectives. On one side are people who would create a bubble to live out their entirety, depriving all of any means to harm them. On the other are those who wish to live their lives, understanding that those who would do them harm are the true enemy of society. Everyone should strive for peaceful existence, but ideology differs on how best to achieve that.

The side waving the anti-gun banner should be ostracized for their pure laziness in pursuing a blanket fix. As hard as banning guns or making them more difficult to obtain may be, it's still easier than addressing the real problems.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top