tipoc
Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2006
- Messages
- 3,563
Peter Eick's points in post #73 are on point I believe.
The 40 S&W is one of the better self defense rounds in it's various loads available today. It's chambered in some very good guns and if a person can shoot those guns well in .40 S&W then it's a good choice for self defense.
It's my opinion that this round is at it's best in the 155-165 gr. loads. A minority opinion as most seem to favor a 180 gr. load at a slower speed closer to that of the 44 Spl.
The 10mm is by any common measurement a more powerful round. With some loads from the 40 you can come close to some loads of the 10mm but it involves contortions and extreme pressures. Why go to all that, especially when it can be done from the 10mm without breaking a sweat?
The 10mm can be both an excellent self defense round and a good hunting round for hogs, black bear, deer of all sizes and even elk with a good shot at a proper distance.
An examination of reloading manuals, Fowler's "Ammo and Ballistics", "Ammo Encyclopedia" by Allen and Bussard or other sources shows this.
tipoc
The 40 S&W is one of the better self defense rounds in it's various loads available today. It's chambered in some very good guns and if a person can shoot those guns well in .40 S&W then it's a good choice for self defense.
It's my opinion that this round is at it's best in the 155-165 gr. loads. A minority opinion as most seem to favor a 180 gr. load at a slower speed closer to that of the 44 Spl.
The 10mm is by any common measurement a more powerful round. With some loads from the 40 you can come close to some loads of the 10mm but it involves contortions and extreme pressures. Why go to all that, especially when it can be done from the 10mm without breaking a sweat?
The 10mm can be both an excellent self defense round and a good hunting round for hogs, black bear, deer of all sizes and even elk with a good shot at a proper distance.
An examination of reloading manuals, Fowler's "Ammo and Ballistics", "Ammo Encyclopedia" by Allen and Bussard or other sources shows this.
tipoc