1911 carry

Status
Not open for further replies.
Stickjockey said:
Another one for condition one.

However, a couple times I have looked and noticed the retention strap has un-locked the pistol.
I have a Galco "Fletch" OWB that I've had no problem with; might give that a try.

<<chuckles>> Ironically, the Galco Fletch is what I'm using. :)

It hasn't been a problem for a while, more when it was new and stiff. The Fletch is technically designed for "hammer down on an empty chamber" carry, at least that's what the paperwork with mine said. So, when carrying C&L the strap was in a slightly different position than what it was designed for. Once it was broken in it stopped being a problem.

I think the other part was the extended safety on mine seemed a little more prone to catch on the strap.
 
Me too! ;)
Cocked & Locked is the only way. Now, :banghead: Get it through your head!:D
 
Condition 1 for me too. I know somebody who carries condition zero and I don't have a problem with that either. The grip safety makes condition zero carry safer than a Glock, IMO. Glocks are carried in condition zero and have no grip safety. I choose condition 1 because releasing the safety during the draw is so natural that I like the added safety that the manual safety gives me.
 
Condition 1.

I don't like lowering a hammer on a live round; waaaay too many bad things can come from that. Besides, the 1911 is deployed most quickly in condition 1. Why handicap yourself when there's already so much working against you, should you find yourself in deep doodoo?
 
You know, Browning didn't design the 1910 and 1911 to have a manual safety. It was added at the military's insistence. One is best advised to simply keep their finger away from the trigger.
 
You know, Browning didn't design the 1910 and 1911 to have a manual safety. It was added at the military's insistence. One is best advised to simply keep their finger away from the trigger.
Browning was a brilliant engineer, designer and fabricator. He was not a soldier, cop or gunfighter.

But he was smart enough to listen to the customer!
 
See photo ...


IMG_5529.jpg


Condition 1 for me too. I know somebody who carries condition zero and I don't have a problem with that either. The grip safety makes condition zero carry safer than a Glock, IMO. Glocks are carried in condition zero and have no grip safety. I choose condition 1 because releasing the safety during the draw is so natural that I like the added safety that the manual safety gives me.

You know, Browning didn't design the 1910 and 1911 to have a manual safety. It was added at the military's insistence. One is best advised to simply keep their finger away from the trigger.

I feel the same way. And I don't consider a Glock unsafe to carry. Just make sure your shirt tail doesn't get shoved down in the holster and keep your booger hook off the bang switch.

I don't yet carry my 1911, as there is a 16 to 20 week waiting list for the Brommeland Max Con-V and I'm only 9 weeks in :banghead:. When I do, it may be condition 0, but I'll probably stick to Cocked & Locked, as flipping off the safety on the draw feels so natural to me. It is actually difficult for me not to hit the safety.

One other thing about Condition 2: only the Series 80 type 1911s have firing pin safeties. So if you drop a non series 80 with the hammer lowered on a live round, there is a possibility (a very remote one, as I'm not sure that it has even happened - though in theory it could) that the hammer could impart just enough energy to the firing pin to touch off the chambered round. Again, probably not realistic from what I've read, but I don't care to find out.
 
The whole series 80 safety was designed so Cops wouldn't be told there guns were cocked by Civilians. It made the populous feel safer. +1000000000000000 for cocked and locked.

I think you'll notice if you look at JMB's other gun designs 1903 1908 etc. etc. he did like grips safeties. Although as said earlier in initial desing the 1911 was without it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top