shootingthebreeze
Member
I just love my Kahr P380-the biggest sell was the fit and no creeping out of the hand on firing. It's very comfortable to fire at the range. Amazingly accurate for a .380. Every round fed properly.
I am not "stepping down" from a larger, more powerful handgun, I am "stepping up" from carrying nothingAt present, I don't own a .380. And in spite of owning a Mustang for a number of years, I have NEVER felt the need to step down from my G19/23, G26 or PM9 to carry the .380 Mustang. Finally, I just sold the Mustang because I see the PM9 as a much better choice that is extremely easy to carry when one absolutely MUST go VERY small and VERY light (which for me is VERY RARE!).
I am wondering... I know the .380 is the current "flavor of the week" in small carry guns. But I just don't understand the attraction. I can carry the G19 with ease under almost every circumstance (16 rounds of 9mm +P on tap!), and the G26 (11 rounds of 9mm +P on tap) with even greater ease. And when I'm really, really, really trying to fly LIGHT, the PM9 does that job well (with 7 rounds of 9mm +P on tap). But this is the unusual carry circumstance for me.
So, really, I'm wondering, why, oh why, do lots of folks feel that it's so very necessary to step down to .380? Are guns like the PM9 simply too large, too heavy, too difficult for you folks to carry? I don't get it? I view the PM9 as downright tiny... is it still simply too big and heavy for frequent carry for a lot of you folks?
^ +1 I guess the guys who keep trying to compare the small 9mm to a pocket .380 don't own a scale or a tape measure.