45 ACP Bullet Setback

Status
Not open for further replies.

24-7 Dave

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
17
Location
Yorktown, VA
Been a while since I have been to this forum, but I am finally getting time to reload again--and I can really use some advice from the experts in the group before I make a serious mistake. I have been reloading pistol (mostly 9mm, .38/357, 45 ACP and some .44 Mag.) for 32 years, but my job got in the way the last 10 years and seriously limited my reloading and range time, so I am taking it slow and re-learning as I go.
I am finally getting away from cast lead bullets that I stockpiled during the Obama scare, and working up loads for plated (Xtreme) and FMJ (RMR) bullets for my 45 ACPs. While I have been loading FMJ 9mm rounds for years, I only recently made the switch to jacketed bullets for my 1911. Long story short, I encountered suspected setback issues several weeks ago with some .45 ACP FMJ and jacketed HP reloads (with minimal/almost no crimp) to the point where I could detect a difference in the report and recoil from round to round, so I stopped, packed up and went home to figure it out. My cast lead reloads had behaved themselves when fired, but the jacketed rounds were acting erratically, so the only thing I could think was that the larger diameter cast bullets had enough case tension to stay in place while the jacketed reloads were setting back. I measured the OAL of my unfired cast and jacketed reloads, put them in a magazine, hit the slide release to run them against the clean feed ramp of a Rock Island 1911, then ejected them manually to see if the OAL changed. Little to no change on the cast bullets, but the jacketed rounds worried me. Some set back significantly, which I assume could account for increased pressure/increased recoil. After the shock wore off from that experiment, I made up some dummy 230 gr FMJ rounds (no cannelures) using fully processed brass (wet steel pin tumbled/sized) R-P and Starline cases (I only use those head stamps) and seated the bullets as usual with little to no crimp, then made up some with an added step using a Lee factory crimp die that I had bought previously to remove case bulges on range brass I'd picked up (while my 1911 eats everything, the Smith M&P Shield only chambers 'perfect' rounds or it won't go to battery...) I set the factory crimp die to apply some crimp, but not enough to affect head spacing on the case mouth. Found that the reloads made with minimal/no crimp were setting back from .025 to as much as .040 when the 230 gr FMJ bullets hit the ramp, while the ones using the factory crimp were still setting back, but only .010 on average. My questions to the experts in the forum:
1. What is an acceptable (safe) amount of setback to accept when reloading FMJ bullets, and am I missing something important in my experiments?
2. Should I find a different recipe that calls for a deeper seating depth for more contact with the case to start with? My current recipe calls for an OAL of 1.273 for the 230 gr bullets, which is close to max length, but it works fine every time with cast loads in my 1911.
As with everyone else, I am kind of limited to the powders I have on hand, so I am using Blue Dot although I did find a fresh pound of WIN 231 last month, and trying to minimize the amount of live fire experimentation to conserve my primer supply until the availability increases and the prices come back down.
Thank you for your advice!
 
RP brass has a history of being soft and thin, so it can produce less neck tension.

Measure the dia of your bullets and make sure they are not under size, 0.252" normal.

May want to check the size of your expander. Should give a 0.002'-0.003" interface fit.
 
Thanks to everyone for the quick responses, you gave me a lot to consider. To answer the questions, I try to standardize on one or two head stamps per caliber, especially for rifle calibers, to have a consistent internal volume. Since I initially bought mostly Remington factory ammo for my 1911, I naturally kept everything I fired for reloading since I knew where it came from, and I have added to my supply of RP brass whenever I came across more on the range floor. But if RP brass is soft, then I will have to dump out my range brass buckets and start transitioning to other head stamps. I'll try putting together some new dummy rounds this weekend with Federal and Winchester cases.
For sizing and flaring, I use the standard Lee carbide dies and flare just enough for the bullet to sit inside the lip of the opening and no more. I'll check the expander when I pull out the dies this weekend and see how it measures up.
I just checked the diameter of a couple 230 gr FMJ RN bullets I used from RMR for these loads and one was right at .450, so there may be some borderline bullets in the batch -- thanks for reminding me to not take it for granted that all meet spec out of the box. I had checked a number for consistent weight but should have measured more than one for diameter.
And while I'm at the reloading bench I'll measure the outside diameter of the case before and after seating the bullet and make sure they all pass muster. Pretty sure I checked a couple and they were about right, but I'll make sure.
Thanks again for all the good advice and getting me thinking again, I'll prep some different head stamps to try in dummy rounds and see if I can find some Hornady FMJ bullets at the store or at the gun show in Richmond tomorrow. If not, I'll go through the RMR bullets and make sure none that I use in the dummy rounds are smaller than .451-.452. Hopefully between the different brass and using bullets that all meet spec I can eliminate the problem and continue to reload and shoot safely.
 
I just checked the diameter of a couple 230 gr FMJ RN bullets I used from RMR for these loads and one was right at .450, so there may be some borderline bullets in the batch

I measured a few of these bullets also, and you are correct. The bullets I measured were .4505" or .4500". I also measured just the bottom rim of a few bullets, and they were all .4515". So the rim that goes in first is about 1/1000th" bigger. Not sure how much of an effect that has. I will load up a few dummy rounds and will let you know if I see any setback. I haven't tested setback in 45acp for a while. The COL I load is 1.255". I aim for 1.255", with variation hopefully it does not go below 1.250", but nothing obviously is perfect. I also use the Lee dies and Lee FCD.
 
FWIW, I just measured some RMR 230gr FMJs that are advertised as .451”-.452” and they were all .451-.4515” at the base and .451” just above the base. I also measured some rounds loaded to a COL of 1.265”+/- and the bullet diameters at the case mouths were all .450”. They passed the thumb pressure setback test and when I cycled some through a pistol, I measured .0005-.001” of setback. ymmv
 
I prefer no setback, but tolerate the .003-.005” range and make sure my loads will operate safely if that occurs. .010” would be too much IMO.
I don’t have problems with RP brass, and typically load mixed HS. I’ll separate it when I have to load for revolver where it’ll be in a moon clip.
What RMR .45 bullet do you have that’s undersized?
 
When I started reloading a few years ago I did a setback test using a couple of dummy rounds in my 1911 with 230gr fmj.

IIRC I had 0.008" of setback after chambering ten times with the slide release. Or about 0.001" each time they chambered.

chris
 
Sounds like you have 2 separate things going on.

Make sure you're setting the sizing die up correctly. If the sizing die isn't pressing on the shell holder/camming over it's not adjusted correctly. You should also measure a couple cases after sizing them. You should be getting .466"/.467" at the case mouth after sizing.

This is a picture of a lee expander button (top) for the 45acp die set next to a lyman m-die.
AtiYtlr.jpg
You can clearly see a ring (high water mark) on that lee expander. That got there from the case mouths it expanded. As you can see the lee expander doesn't go very deep into the case compared to the m-die that goes into the case up to the "step" at the top of the expander button.. I use the lee expander for jacketed bullets nd the m-die for cast/coated bullets.

The lee expander can not go far enough into the case to affect the neck tension on the bullets base/body.

I read this all the time and still have no idea why reloaders are doing this:
"I only flare the case enough to get the bullet started". And "I only use a minimal crimp/only enough crimp to remove the flare"

??????
What you trying to keep from wearing your cases out?

The only thing the minimal/just enough crimp does is cause feeding issues along with reducing accuracy by making sure you don't have a consistent short start pressure.

Countless millions of bullseye shooters have loaded the h&g #68 swc bullets in every different case mfg you can come up with. The gold standard is a 1.250" OAL with a .469" crimp.

The lee taper crimp die is setup so that it only affects the last +/- 20/1000th's of the case mouth. A picture of a hp #68 .452" cast bullet next to a solid nosed #68 .452" cast bullet. Both have a .469" taper crimp from a lee taper crimp die.
rQlREhC.jpg

Click on that picture and save it to your computer. Then open it and enlarge it 300% and take a good look at that .469" taper crimp. Take a look at the reloads body while your at it. You see 2 things:
There's no bullet bulge/wasp waist in the case from the bullet.
The .469" crimp is not excessive/digging into the bullet.

IMHO:
Your not sizing the cases all the way into the sizing die. Could be die adjustment or it could be the shell holder is too thick on top & not allowing you to push the 45acp cases into the sizing die far enough to size your case mouths to .466"/.467".
The minimal/very little/almost no crimp is doing nothing for you.
 
The minimal/very little/almost no crimp is doing nothing for you.

That.

FWIW, My main stash of .45ACP brass is RP... not only there, but in 9mm and .41MAG as well a number of rifle cartridges... I have no problems anywhere with bullet setback. I only use the standard resizing die set to hit the shellplate or shell holder with a case run up in the die (important!) ...and then the standard case mouth flare die... nothing special. Although I have used the built-in roll (or taper) crimp in the seater die, I prefer to crimp in a separate step... using a separate taper crimp die. I've found it's easier to adjust the amount of crimp for special situations... thinner brass or different sized bullets. Over recent years I've loaded all manner of plated bullets for the .45... Xtreme, Berrys, Speer, RMR, and others... without setback issues.

As Forrest and others have mentioned... check that your sizer die is tapping the shellplate with a case run up into the die, and then adjust that crimp to... well... hold the bullet. That's what it's there for.
 
The RP brass should be fine, but may want to try Winchester or Magtech if you have it, it sounds like you have very slightly undersized bullets and loading a bit long. With 230g fmj, I load 1.260" and I could probably go shorter. I'd work up some dummys at 1.250 and a firm crimp, and see if they set back. I'll hazzard a guess and say that will probably solve the issue.
 
I tested 4 different brands of 45 acp range brass i had sitting around. The dummy rounds were placed on a digital scale & pressure was slowly applied to the bullet nose, till bullet moved deeper into the case.

Brass has a memory & wants to return to its original size. Hope it makes sense?

full.jpg
 
If the sizing die isn't pressing on the shell holder/camming over it's not adjusted correctly.
Follow die instructions here. An older RCBS tungsten carbide ring may crack, if doing cam over.



or it could be the shell holder is too thick on top
Shell holders have a standard deck height, .125" +/- .001" from my measurements. I guess there could be an exception?
 
I’ve found work hardened brass resisting resize and excess flairing of the case mouth are the biggest cause for low neck tension.
I’ve also found 45 to need more crimp than 9mm to reliably chamber. (In my Kimber). I use minimal or no crimp with 9mm.
I recommend seating and crimping in a separate step for 45ACP.
If I feel any bullets that seat very easily I press the cartridge firmly against a notepad on my bench to check for setback. I accept to movement at all.
 
I doubt it is your brass or your bullets

Since you use the FCD you need to set it to remove any flare you put on the case mouth
Yes do need to "crimp" the bullet aka remove the flair or taper crimp.

What is your case mouth outside measurement after seating "crimping. It should around .470
 
Remmington brass is definitely thinner than other brands, but with a proper crimp, they should still work fine. Here is what I do to determine the amount of crimp. I seat the bullet to the proper depth. I then measure the diameter of the brass at the base of the bullet. Next, I adjust the taper crimp until the mouth of the case measures one thousandth smaller than the measurement at the base of the bullet. This has always seemed to work for me.
 
What is an acceptable (safe) amount of setback to accept when reloading
Zero. I hope someone said zero.;)
Setback is dangerous, and avoidable.

Setback in a Desert Eagle is unpleasant, to say the least…

For a cartridge that headspaces on the mouth, the crimp is a dimension, to keep the cartridge from igniting too far into the chamber and having too much headspace. The case mouth must be small enough to chamber, yet still stop at the chamber’s end.
It isn’t there for ignition, as a taper crimp on a cannelure-less bullet doesn’t hold anything. It is to close the flare. The springing neck tension is what holds the bullet.
Brass springs, lead doesn’t. To get .469” at the case mouth, it must close down more than that. Bringing the lead there too. But the case will spring and the lead won’t. How that helps with ignition, like a roll crimp, is lost on me. The roll crimp must unfold before the bullet moves, the taper is just a very weak funnel, with a pre-made slop fit, with the rest of the case providing the hold.
Foremost, I don’t make my bullets smaller before they hit the bore.


Setback is dangerous because it raises the cartridge pressure. Loading deeper can give more bullet hold, until the bullet ogive is below the case. But a reduction in charge is in order first, working back up.
It can also increase bullet grip by seating into the tapered wall of the case where there is more tension. But caution must be used to avoid seating so deep the base of the bullet is diminished. The bullet base is the key to accuracy, I think.
 
Bullet retention in an auto pistol is wholly set by the Expander. The Sizing Die takes the case OD to an undersize, then the Expander comes along and enlarges the case ID. (This totally eliminates the case wall thickness from consideration.) The case ID needs to be 0.002 to 0.003" smaller than the bullet's shank. Measure the size of your Expander. It is common for the Expander to have a wide tolerance on diameter, especially on lower-priced dies. If it's over-sized, then put the Expander into a drill press and apply emery cloth or stones until it reaches the correct diameter.

X6PkbZFl.jpg

You did not have these issues when you were shooting lead, because the lead bullets are themselves 0.001 to .003" larger than plated/jacketed. Now that you are using smaller diameter bullets, you'll need to reduce your Expander accordingly.
 
Bullet retention in an auto pistol is wholly set by the Expander. The Sizing Die takes the case OD to an undersize, then the Expander comes along and enlarges the case ID. (This totally eliminates the case wall thickness from consideration.) The case ID needs to be 0.002 to 0.003" smaller than the bullet's shank. Measure the size of your Expander. It is common for the Expander to have a wide tolerance on diameter, especially on lower-priced dies. If it's over-sized, then put the Expander into a drill press and apply emery cloth or stones until it reaches the correct diameter.

View attachment 1037874

You did not have these issues when you were shooting lead, because the lead bullets are themselves 0.001 to .003" larger than plated/jacketed. Now that you are using smaller diameter bullets, you'll need to reduce your Expander accordingly.


The expander the op is using isn't any where near as long as the 1 in your picture. A lee expander is lucky to get 1/4"+ of it's expander nose that actually is large enough in diameter to expand the case into the 45acp case. And even then the expander is tapered/smaller at the bottom. A picture of the lee expander (top) that has a ring in the middle of the expander nose. That ring is left there from the case mouths after being expanded.
AtiYtlr.jpg
 
The lee expander can not go far enough into the case to affect the neck tension on the bullets base/body.

I have NO experience with LEE dies, so this is a question from a non user of them.

Your pic looks as the expander could be set up to also bell the case if it was adjusted deeper, wouldn't that also expand farther into the case...?
I any regard, couldn't the expander be set so it expands the case even without belling...?

Also, the expander does just that---makes the case (neck) wider, wouldn't anything below the expander be smaller , and therefore help with bullet tension...?

Again, I'm not being "THAT GUY", I am just trying to understand . As the expander/powder funnel that I use is the one that @rfwobbly has posted a pic of. ( Notice I didn't call it by brand....)...;)
 
Did you readjust your expander die when you switched from lead to jacketed? Since their diameters are generally different, the amount of flare needed to seat a lead bullet many times leave less neck tension when using jacketed. I use a lot of Remington brass and have never had an issue with setback in .45ACP. With plated bullets, too much crimp will also reduce neck tension. I've found that minimizing flare with them is the key, even to the point of chamfering the inside of the brass to allow for easier seating. I had issues in the past with Lee dies not sizing down cases enough to provide any neck tension. This was with their .380 dies. Their fix was to tell me I needed to buy their "undersized" sizing die. It did fix the problem, but it ended up that set of Lee dies cost me more than other, better quality dies.
 
couldn't the expander be set so it expands the case even without belling.
I use a universal expander to bell without expanding for slippery coated bullets. Less expanding will make more tension. (Like said above too, smaller expander.)The flare is just a funnel to get the bullet in. Some jacketed bullets don’t even need the flare.
 
I had 45s setback when using an older resize die (truly sorry but forgot the maker of it)
I got a Dillon one, and never have a problem.
It boils down to neck tension from the resizing part of the process, and Dillon is said by some to size down to the smaller of the sizing tolerances (They not only want bullets to stay in place, but also want their ammo to cycle in as many firearms as possible without problems. This is just my one experience with the issue, YMMV
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top