WrongHanded
Member
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2017
- Messages
- 4,771
10mm. It's what I typically carry anyway.
Nah, 45 never wanted to be smaller, he’s been fat and happy his whole life.10mm it’s what 45ACP always wanted to be!
In terms of sheer affectiveness, .45 ACP is and always will be superior to all others on that list.
There is no replacement for displacement, and the huge .45 caliber and heavyweight bullet is devastating on target.
10mm uses a much smaller projectile and is limited in bullet weights. Gelatin testing shows lackluster results compared to ACP.
In that case any of the major service calibers would be fine with me.The area is "iffy" at times. There are the occasional two-legged miscreants, but no large dangerous animals.
I'm going to submit the idea that gel does not paint the whole picture and I'll use gel results to illustrate my point.
https://www.luckygunner.com/labs/revolver-ballistics-test/
These two bullets perform basically the same in gel, same penetration & expansion.
4'' 38 Special 158 LSWCHP+P 13.4'' / .56 - 921 fps - 298# KE
4'' 357 Mag 125 SJHP 13.6'' / .54 - 1,473 fps - 602# KE
I'm going to guess that most people would say the 357 Mag has better ASAP potential despite the similar gel result.
Using the 357 Mag load above in another comparison with a close enough gel result.
https://www.luckygunner.com/labs/self-defense-ammo-ballistic-tests/
380 Hornady FTX Critical Defense 90 gr. 13.2'' / .52 - 910 fps - 166# KE
4'' 357 Mag 125 SJHP 13.6'' / .54 - 1,473 fps - 602# KE
Looking at the gel result that 380 performs almost as well as a full house 357 Mag; somehow I don't think gel result is reflective of the whole picture.
If gel result vs whole picture is suspect in these examples, generalize that to 10mm vs 45.
It's wonderful when someone can so easily illustrate that the "penetration and expansion only" argument leaves a lot to be desired. And do so simply by challenge those who believe such nonsense to pick a .380acp over a .357 magnum, because they're "equally effective".