umm... not to pick nits here but a lot of stuff i've read just isn't passing my sanity filter
135 decibles will typically implode the human ear drum.
the article claims 140db is the "threshold of pain"
granted, ANY gun, even with subsonic rounds will damage your hearing.
however, a 223/5.56 is just obnoxious. it's one of the most annoying, painful reports of any caliber i've ever heard. and yet, the article claims a .45acp is 2db lower.
that means one of two things:
there's not a direct correlation between db and pain
or
the data is garbage (possible, as measuring db is notoriously difficult to do (read silencertests.com's methods for more info than you wanted to know))
if i have to fire a gun indoors (or out, for that matter) w/o hearing protection, i'll take a 22 or 45 over just about any rifle.
i've no idea whether the sonic crack makes a difference
edit: btw, i've been told the fhn 5.7 is obscenely loud, although i haven't fired mine yet so can't say for sure