Well hopefully after the holidays we will hear back on the status of this whole situation. Either the ATF will process the new FFL for the new shop or they will deny it and it can move to court I believe would be the next step.
I can't speak as to what PAC N Arms will do but I hope at some point we'll start pushing this subject and getting people to start asking FFL's, the more that ask and the more that realize you CAN do it without reprisal (assuming this case ends well) the more that might not comply. Of course, how do we weed out the liars?
And like it was said, it is not illegal if the FFL voluntarily gives it up, just if they demand it. Personally I feel safer knowing there's someone willing to protect my information.
Do you really think your FFL dealer who makes his living selling guns will tell you the truth about allowing access to his records?There are other organizations involved in this now, I will leave it at that until something concrete happens.
By all means though, keep the dialog going, this isn't something that should be shrugged off. Ask if YOUR local gunshop is allowing them blanket access to your records.
This is specifically prohibited by Federal law. 18 USC 926 categorically prohibits anyone in the Justice Department (including the ATF) from seizing any records or documents other than those constituting material evidence of a violation of law.
You do realize that when an FFL closes up shop, the ATF gets ALL their records then anyway, right?I'm a customer of Phil's and was caught up on what he's been going through with this bullying and I applaud him for putting up a fight. <...> Cabela's and Kittery Trading Post apparently just turn a blind eye and the let the ATF come in and copy all their 4473s. Is there a way file a FOIA request to see what <...> is going on with this? I have nothing to hide but when Phil told me about this, <...> (and) as I thought about it more, I was enraged at these other dealers just allowing the ATF to just run rampant in their records. <................> If Phil and one shop in Alaska are the only ones standing up to this, than we are screwed as gun owners. If these places are selling guns and allowing the ATF to just come in and thumb drive their records than they ought to have a sign out saying, "We supply all your information to the ATF so if you are making a purchase here, please be informed that, you are giving consent to (insert gun shop here) registering your firearm".
It sure would be nice if other gun shops (and I know there are a few that are probably lurking on here, cough, Howell's) actually had the <integrity> to stand up to this tyranny. If these places won't protect our privacy, and say NO to these <creatures> than I'll just give all my business to Phil. At least I know he keeps his word.
We need to make some noise over this or we're plain shafted!!!
I don't see how more people on here aren't freaking livid at their local gun shops for just handing over YOUR info to these clowns.
Interesting...You do realize that when an FFL closes up shop, the ATF gets ALL their records then anyway, right?
As MErl said, only records in the past 20 years. Otherwise if a gun shop can legally destroy them (after 20 years).You do realize that when an FFL closes up shop, the ATF gets ALL their records then anyway, right?
I do not understand why the owner of the shop did not make a couple phone calls of his own say to his local or state law enforcement customers and that ATF agent should have wound up duct taped to a tree with a bottle of honey dumped over his head. This was Alaska was it not?
So I guess I'm alone in thinking that the FBI doesn't delete background check data and the BATFE e-file system is already a national gun registry...
It's a violation of Federal law if they don't delete it.DHJenkins So I guess I'm alone in thinking that the FBI doesn't delete background check data
You wouldn't be alone on this because the National Firearms Act of 1934 requires a registry of NFA firearms.and the BATFE e-file system is already a national gun registry...
It's a violation of Federal law if they don't delete it.
Well there's no way this administration would violate federal law.