Interested to have opinons on this case.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51417
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51417
federal prison for the next 20 years for assault with serious bodily injury, assault with a deadly weapon, discharging of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence, violating civil rights and obstruction of justice.
In a move that still confuses Ramos and Compean, the U.S. government filed charges against them after giving full immunity to Aldrete-Davila and paying for his medical treatment at an El Paso hospital.
IMHO, criminals fleeing from law enforcement surrender their civil rights.
Well what about that whole "innocent until proven guilty" thing?
What's so innocent about being in possession of 800 pounds of illegal drugs and running from Border Patrol? The misconception people have about the constitution is they think it applies to everyone. The constitutional amendments Do Not apply to non-Americans. The amendments don't apply to illegal immigrant drug runners, Al Qaeda terrorists, the prisoners down in Guantanamo Bay, etc
If by that you mean that you're not comfortable with cops handing out punishment to people they believe to be criminals, I'd agree. Shame that has nothing to do with this case. Ramos was in pursuit of a fleeing felon, who (apparently, 'though the article is poorly written) had shot his partner.I'm not comfortable with cops handing out punishment to people "criminals".
Further, Kanof argued, it was a violation of Border Patrol policy for agents to pursue fleeing suspects.