Brady 5yr plan to abolish guns

Status
Not open for further replies.

Trueno

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
191
Location
Tejas!
Don't blow a gasket, it's been around for years and is still good for a few laughs. :rolleyes:








Handgun Control Inc. 5 Year Plan
In December of 1993, this document was leaked by a Handgun Control Inc.
volunteer, and exposes the ultimate goals of elite anti-gunners;
The eventual elimination of ALL guns and ALL hunting!

-------------------------------------------------------------------
(NOTES AND MINUTES OF MEETING OF FRIDAY, DECEMBER 17, 1993)
ROUGH DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR INTERNAL MEMO AND FIVE YEAR PLAN
(OF HANDGUN CONTROL INC.)

WHAT IS PENDING NOW AND CAN BE LAW IN 1994
* Ban of all clips holding over 6 bullets.
* Ban on all semiautos which can fire more than 6 bullets without reloading.
* Ban of possession of parts to convert arms into miliary configuration.
* Ban on all pump shotguns capable of being converted to more than 5 shots without reloading.
* Banning of all machine guns, destructive devices, short shotguns/rifles and assault weapons.
* Banning of Saturday Night Specials.
* Banning of Non-Sporting Ammunition
* Arsenal licensing (for possession of multiple guns and large amounts of ammunition)
* Elimination of the Department of Civil Marksmanship.
* Ban on possession of a firearm within a home located within 1000 feet of a schoolyard.
* Ban on all realistic replicas/toy guns or non-firearms capable of being rendered realistic.
* The right of the victim of gun violence to sue manufacturers and dealers to be affirmed and
perhaps, aided with money from government programs.
* Taxes on ammo, Dealers licenses & guns to offset the medical costs to society.
* The eventual ban on all semiautomatics (regardless of when made or caliber).

WHAT WAS ONLY A DREAM TEN YEARS AGO CAN
BE REALITY AS EARLY AS THIS YEAR
(After the meeting the following ideas were the result of a brainstorming session to guide
the focus of gun control initiatives over the next five years. These may not be politically
feasible for 1994, but we are confident that with continued pressure we can achieve most if
not all of these goals within the next five years. The following list is condensed from our
meeting in which we considered the best ideas for public safety expansion. The time is
right for action.)

FIVE YEAR PLAN

LICENSES:

1. NATIONAL LICENSING OF ALL HANDGUN PURCHASES
This is at the top of our list, however, the political climate may be right to initiate this step
immediately. Please refer to our memo outlining our ideas on how this should be executed.

2. LICENSE FOR RIFLES AND SHOTGUNS
We should take our cues from Great Britain. Strict licensing should be mandatory -- for all
firearms whether handguns or not.

3. STATE LICENSES FOR OWNERSHIP OF FIREARMS
We want to take a workable idea from Great Britain, whereas, we should require the states to
issue strict licenses for possession and require the licenses to be signed by at least three public
officials --i.e., the police chief, city attorney and mayor, for example, to eliminate ownership by
dangerous individuals. It is reasonable to require that all individuals must prove to the signers
that they require a firearm. This should be attached to any legislation requiring purchasers to
show a need for a firearm.

4. REDUCTION OF THE NUMBER OF GUNS TO REQUIRE AN ARSENAL LICENSE
Right now the proposed Arsenal licenses which Senator Feinstein should be pushing for,
requires an "Arsenal License" for those people who feel they need more than 20 guns and 1000
rounds of ammunition. We feel that number is too generous, due to the fact that any number of
guns constitutes a grave threat to the safety of the community; we suggest Strongly that this
license limit be reduced to possession greater than 5 guns and 250 rounds of ammunition.

5. ARSENAL LICENSE FEES
It is not unreasonable to require a yearly fee for an Arsenal license to be at least $300, with a
cap of $1000. The money collected can be used to defray the immense medical costs directly
attributed to these deadly weapons.

6. LIMITS ON ARSENAL LICENSING
No Arsenal Licensing to be permitted in counties with populations of more than 200,000.

7. REQUIREMENT OF FEDERALLY APPROVED STORAGE SAFES FOR ALL GUNS
We should follow Great Britain's lead on this. All licensed gun owners should be required to
have a storage safe which meets minimum federally mandated requirements. This step would
reduce the tragic accidents which claim the lives of tens of thousands of children a year and
make it more difficult for burglars to steal the guns.

8. INSPECTION LICENSE
Another good revenue source would be mandatory inspection licensing of all safes. Each safe
would be registered with a specific serial number and the serial numbers and types of weapons
stored would be on file with federal and state authorities. Since unannounced inspectors can
insure that all declared weapons are being properly stored, all safe licenses should have an
additional yearly fee to offset the cost of these spot inspections.


PUBLIC SAFETY REGULATIONS:

9.BAN ON MANUFACTURING IN COUNTRIES WITH A POPULATION OF MORE
THAN 200,000
Guns are being built all the time and the number of licensed manufacturers it too great to justify
the threat to public safety. This is a small step to reduce the number of these shops where,
anything, even machine guns, are being built every day.

10. BANNING ALL MILITARY STYLE FIREARMS
The pending national ban on all Assault Weapons, based on a point system can be expanded to
eventually cover any firearm with a remotely military appearance. We feel that this aggressive
appearance appeals to the type of dangerous individuals who are a definite threat to public
safety. We hope that this point system can eventually be expanded to high powered airguns and
"paint ball" weapons, which can inflict great damage, and with a little effort can be converted to
real guns.

11.BANNING OF ANY MACHINE GUN PARTS OR PARTS WHICH CAN BE USED IN
A MACHINE GUN
Periodicals such as "The Shotgun News" particularly cater to individuals who wish to build
illegal machine guns. If Senator Feinstein's courageous section of the crime bill is successful in
banning all machine gun parts expect for police and military, then there would be no legitimate
need for machine gun parts except to build illegal weapons.

12. BANNING THE CARRYING OF A FIREARMS ANYWHERE BUT HOME OR
TARGET RANGE OR IN TRANSIT FROM ONE TO THE OTHER
We should institute a federal mandate to the states to strictly regulate the carrying of a firearm.

13. BANNING REPLACEMENT PARTS (MFG, SALE, POSSESSION, TRANSFER,
INSTALLATION) EXCEPT BARREL, TRIGGER GROUP
Thousand of people are building illegal weapons every day. We can put a dent in this by
banning parts and parts kits, except those items like the barrel and trigger group, which are most
likely to wear out due to use.

14. ELIMINATION OF THE CURIO RELIC LIST
A gun is a gun. Even an old gun can kill people. This a loop hole in the federal law which was
allowed thousands of dangerous weapons to be distributed unchecked. This regulation, if
enacted, would automatically eliminate the need for a Curio or Relic collector's license. All
handguns, rifles and shotguns would fall into the same category as their modern counterparts.

15. CONTROL OF AMMUNITION BELONGING TO CERTAIN SURPLUS FIREARMS
Senator Moynihan has already proposed a tax or ban on .22 LR, .32 ACP, and 9mm
ammo,however, it has been pointed out to us that there is an extreme proliferation of high
powered surplus rifles (i.e.,the Mosin-Nagant series and Enfield series) in which the wholesale
prices are as low as $45 to $75. We suggest that to control the proliferation of violence
associated with the large number of these types of weapons entering this country that we ban the
importation of their ammunition. 7.62x54R and .303 surplus ammunition.

16. EVENTUAL BAN OF HANDGUN POSSESSION
This may be closer to reality than many of us think. Handguns are becoming increasingly
unpopular and we think that within five years we can enact a total ban on possession at the
federal level.

17. BANNING OF ANY AMMO THAT FITS MILITARY GUNS (POST 1945)
With the proliferation of high powered weapons, including semiautomatics and automatics from
World War II, we suggest following the lead of Mexico, by prohibiting the sale, manufacture,
possession or transfer of any caliber fitting a military firearm in service with a recognized
military force after 1945.


AMMUNITION AND EXPLOSIVES:

18. BANNING OF ANY QUANTITY OF SMOKELESS POWDER OR BLACK POWDER
WHICH WOULD CONSTITUTE MORE THAN THE EQUIVALENT OF 100 ROUNDS
OF AMMUNITION
With the bombing of the World Trade Center, it has been made clear that we must reinforce the
above proposed regulation with this additional notation. It is arguable that no one has any real
need to have so much dangerous material on hand.

19. BAN ON THE POSSESSION OF EXPLOSIVE POWDERS OF MORE THAN 1
KILOGRAM AT ANY ONE TIME
Gun nuts are notorious for circumventing the intent of the law, so we can reinforce the above
proposed regulation with this additional notation. This additional language can be useful in
preventing "bomb-makers" and other dangerous individuals.

20. BANNING OF HIGH POWERED AMMO OR WOUNDING AMMO
In addition to the banning of military calibers, there is a plethora of dangerous rounds which are
too high powered for sporting use. This includes the highest calibers of pistol and rifle
ammunition (of note are the monster calibers for rifles and pistols, like the .50 caliber Desert
Eagle Bullet). We should not forget the lessons learned with the insidious Black Talon Ammo.
Hollow points, Glaser killing rounds and other types of ammunition designed specifically for
maiming should be prohibited.

21. A NATIONAL LICENSE FOR AMMUNITION
This is an idea whose time has come. We should look at a Federal License for purchasing of
ammunition of all kinds. A special form should be forwarded to a new federal office to track
those who are purchasing too much ammunition. Remember that a gun is useless without
ammunition.

22. BANNING OR STRICT LICENSING OF ALL RELOADING COMPONENTS
Ammunition regulation laws can be regularly bypassed by home loaders, creating an
underground cottage industry of ammo manufacture. Possession or purchase of reloading
equipment and machines should be restricted and those who wish to use specially loaded
ammunition can go to a federally licensed reloader.

23. NATIONAL REGISTRATION OF AMMUNITION OR AMMO BUYERS
Fees collected from the national licenses should go toward a nationwide database of ammo
buyers with a possible background check to eliminate the purchase of dangerous ammo by felons
or mental patients.

24. REQUIREMENT OF SPECIAL STORAGE SAFE FOR AMMUNITION AND
LICENSING
Like the storage safe for guns, there should be a national requirement for special safes to store
ammo. These safes should be tamperproof and fireproof and be registered themselves so that on
the spot inspections can be held. Again, the costs for these inspections can be absorbed by the
license fees.


GUN RANGES:

25. RESTRICTING GUN RANGES TO COUNTIES WITH POPULATIONS LESS
THAN 200,000
The obvious threat to public safety of shooting ranges and stray bullets has been lost on many
states and counties. We can initiate a federal mandate or incentives to get states to prohibit any
kind of shooting range within a county with a population of more than 200,000.

26. SPECIAL LICENSING OF RANGES
Those ranges which conform to the previous requirement should get special licensing above and
beyond that which is required now. Additionally each existing or new shooting range must get in
writing the permission of all property owners within a radius of seven miles.

27. SPECIAL RANGE TAX TO VISITORS
Additional revenue can be a surtax on ranges, requiring the collection of a minimum of $85 per
visit per person. This can be in addition to required membership fees, upon which the state and
local governments get a sizable portion, to help defray the immense cost of gun violence.

28. WAITING PERIOD FOR RENTALS ON PISTOL RANGES
It has been suggested in the past that felons can acquire pistols and other automatic weapons
without a background check by renting a gun on a target range. Deranged individuals are
basically being given a license to practice hunting humans at these so called "sporting ranges."
We think that a national waiting period for gun rentals is yet another idea whose time has come.

ACTIVITIES WHICH PROMOTE GUN VIOLENCE:

29. BANNING GUN SHOWS
Illegal transfers and the sales of assault weapons and submachine guns is a common event at
these so called gun shows. A huge dent can be made in the illegal trafficking of weapons by
banning these shows altogether.

30. BANNING OF MILITARY RE-ENACTMENTS
The questionable "historical" value of these events has escaped the public scrutiny for too long.
Many of these so called historical events are mere excuses for gun nuts to blast the countryside
with automatic weapons. What is to keep them from loading live bullets and having those stray
bullets kill innocent children? What lives in the future will be lost due to this paramilitary
training going on right under our noses? We propose the prohibition of survivalist/paramilitary,
World War I and World War II and Civil War Re-enactments on federal land, and hope to
encourage the states to prohibit them from state and county lands as well.

31. MAKING UNLAWFUL THE ASSEMBLY OF MORE THAN FOUR ARMED
INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE NOT PEACE OFFICERS OR MILITARY
Since most hunting parties consist of four, we recognize the need to eliminate the currently legal
assembly of shooters for paramilitary training on private lands. This is just one good suggestion
for our elimination of the "gun culture" from the mainstream.

32. BEGIN TO CURB HUNTING ON ALL PUBLIC LANDS
Blood sports are an anathema to a civilized society, however, it has been a political reality that
the hunters and their ilk have too strong of a stranglehold on Congress. We feel that the
impending defeat of high tech assault "killing machines" will open the door to restrictions. With
the diminishing number of hunters, we feel that perhaps in five years we can open up much more
of our country to campers and hikers, andeliminate the threat to families and camping, by
looking at much more restrictions as to what parcels of land will allow hunting. This will not
infringe on sportsmens' rights to hunt on private land.

33. MAKING GUN OWNERS RECORDS AND PHOTOS MATTER OF PUBLIC
RECORD
We would have to assemble a legal team in order to investigate the balance of the right to
privacy and the right to safeguard public. We fully endorse the photographing and fingerprinting
of all gun owners, however, the records are usually relegated to law enforcement only. We think
that it would be a good idea to make these records public, so that the communities can have the
knowledge of who poses a danger to their community before disaster strikes. we realize that this
proposal would probably be controversial, thus a long public affairs campaign would have to
be initiated in order to build public support and ease the transition of such an idea. We feel that
this idea has merit, and can be justified via the past publication of the names of water wasters
during the drought, customers for prostitution, and deadbeat parents who are delinquent on child
support.

34. RANDOM POLICE CHECKS FOR WEAPONS (LIKE SOBRIETY CHECKPOINTS)
This idea was floated before in California in 1989, where some thought it would be a great
deterrent to gang-related crimes for police to do sweeps for gang weapons. Right now this idea
may have some resistance; however, the political climate can become right to initiate these
random vehicle stop and checks at all levels and in all types of neighborhoods. If we continue to
mainstream the pressure we can make this a reality.



THE NEXT FIFTEEN YEARS:
With all that is going on, who knows what is possible in the next few years? With murders in the
streets, the public fed up, and the once mighty thugs of the Gun Lobby whimpering in impotence
we have an opportunity to change the face of America for the better! Previously we thought that
it would take at least a century to eliminate dangerous weapons and guns from the public hands,
but now with allies in the White House and Congress, we can accelerate this trend, and make the
barbaric NRA extinct!!!


Here are some ideas to consider for the long term:

BANNING OF MILITARY ACCOUTREMENTS
Essential to the Neanderthal gun culture are the typical military clothing, camouflage, pouches,
boots and other combat gear. They euphemistically refer to this as "militaria." Elimination of the
future sale of these items will cripple the culture of violence well into the 21st century.


STRICTER GUIDELINES FOR VIOLENCE IN TELEVISION AND THE MOVIES
We should look at the possibility of victims of violence by copying an act on television and the
movie or video screen, suing the makers of such shows for compensation to their suffering. If the
industry cannot regulate itself, we may have to eventually look at an independent branch of
government to determine which scenes cause more harm than good to the public and regulate the
numbers of violent acts portrayed.


THE TOTAL ELIMINATION OF ARMS FROM SOCIETY
We cannot survive into the 21st century unless we remember the need to expand our wave to
new thinking to the total disarmament of America. With much of the public we can become more
like Great Britain, where we can also eliminate the need for much of our police to be armed.
This would take a long time; however, a concerted public relations campaign can pressure local
law enforcement to give up their arms, when the time comes. Weapons would be available to
special units like SWAT or the military.


CONTROL OF DANGEROUS LITERATURE
(BOMB MAKING,MACHINE GUN CONVERSIONS, ETC.)

Too much irresponsible material is purportedly covered by the First Amendment, however, the
time will come when our nation has to agree that some literature does not belong in a safe
society, like instruction manuals on how to kill, or how to make homemade explosives or
nuclear bombs. We must realize that there can be such a thing as too much freedom where such
literature poses a serious threat to the public safety.


1994 SOUNDS THE DEATH KNELL FOR THE BULLY TACTICS OF THE NRA AND
THE CULTURE OF VIOLENCE IN AMERICA!!

We are pressing on all fronts and much of this can become reality sooner than we expect. With
the loss of power and clout of the NRA and their various smaller crony organizations crumbling
to dust, we eliminate a 200-year-old license to murder into history, and enter the 21st century a
safer place for our children and children's children.




-------------------------------------------------------------------------







:D
 
Attachment 1:
(Confidential Information for use by Lobbyists or Senior Officers ONLY!)
I. Proposed License Fees - 1994-1995 Gun Control Proposals
These listings and the documentation used to calculate these suggested fee schedules will be
made available to federal law enforcement authorities and U.S. Department of the Treasury for
review, when the time is right. Additional material will be made available to key politicians
when proposing any fee-related legislation. These suggestions will be instrumental in
determining thenature of future gun control legislation and proposals.
A) Handgun License Fees:
Year 1 to 2: $50-$75 annually.
Year 3 to 4: $150-$250 annually.
Year 5 to 8: $550-$625 annually.
B) Penalties for non-compliance:
(a) Failure to acquire license -- $1,000/6 months jail, revocation of ability to own
(b) Failure to maintain license -- $5,000/12 months jail, revocation of ability to own
(c) Failure to turn over guns for destruction after lapse of license --$15,000/18 months jail,
revocation of ability to own.
Failure to renew license or notify issuing authority of change of status would be considered a
felony. All firearms owned would be then considered contraband, and confiscated. State or
local authorities would be prohibited from retaining or re-selling any confiscated firearms.
Record of destruction to be issued to federal government not later than 60 days after
confiscation.
C) Rifle-Shotgun License:
Program begins at $30 or at cost to maintain federal records on ownership and registration. Fee:
$30-$148 annually.
D) State Licensing:
The Department of Justice for each state will initiate programs at state level, with fees
equivalent to federal.
Fee: $74-$150 annually.
E) Local Licensing:
The cost of annual license to reflect the cost of records-maintenance and enforcement.
Fee: $48-$113 annually.
F) Arsenal License: (20 guns or 1,000 rounds ammo).
Fee: $300-$1,000 annually.
G) Penalty for Non-Compliance of Arsenal Licensing Law:
$5,000/8 months jail, confiscation of all firearms-related property, revocation of ability to own
firearms. (Disposition to be determined by Department of Justice and the state/federal
legislatures.)
H) Safe License:
Fee: $228-$392 annually (based on calculations of set up of computerized records system,
enforcement, registration processing).
I) Ammunition Registration & License:
Fee: $55-$117 for license to buy ammunition (based on calculations of set up of computerized
records-keeping system, enforcement and registration processing).
J) Federal license for Re-Loading (or possession of re-loading equipment) .
Fee: $130-$175 annually.
K) Ammunition Safe License.
Fee: $55-$75 annually.
L) Range License (new federal license on target, outdoor/indoor ranges).
Fee: $12,100-$15,500 annually.
M) Range Tax (imposed on Federally licensed gun ranges).
Fee: $85-$100 per person, per visit.
N) Inspection License: (verifying records of guns and storage) To defray cost of inspection and
firearms safes in business or private homes.
Fee: $588-$678 annually.
II. Suggestions To Be Made Immediately Available to Key
Politicians And Secretary of U.S. Treasury
A) Increase Dealers License (Federal Firearms License 01 and 02) to $600-$750 annually.
B) Increase Title 1 Manufacturing License to $6,200-$9,400 annually.
C) Increase Title 2 Manufacturing License to $13,405-$18,210 annually.
III. Estimate Of Fiscal Impact Of Licensing On Firearms
Ownership
Worst
Case
Best Case
Federal Handgun
License:
$50
$625
Fed. Rifle & Shotgun
License:
$30
$148
Local Gun License Fee:
$48
$113
State Gun License Fee:
$74
$150
Arsenal License Fee:
$300
$1,000
Safe License Fee:
$228
$392
Ammunition License
Fee:
$55
$117
Re-Loading License
Fee:
$130
$175
Ammo Safe License
Fee:
$55
$75
Ammo Inspection Fee:
$588
$678
Total Annual Cost:
$1,558
$3,473
This cost is not unreasonable, since it would offset considerably the estimated $60 billion
dollars in medical and social costs related to gun violence.
IV. Reduction Of Gun Owner Population And Potential
Yearly Revenue
The federal government estimates 65-75 million Americans own guns. These fees and the
licensing requirements would allow us to take guns out of the hands of an estimate 30 million
unsuitable or ineligible individuals. Fees for the remaining would reduce the number to about 14
million. Estimated revenue would constitute a minimum of $21.8 trillion dollars (worst case) to
an estimated $48.6 trillion (best case) annually. Our eventual goal is to reduce the number of
licensees to zero. The revenue itself can be utilized to achieve this goal.
V. Possible Uses for the Revenue
(A) Institute mandatory national, comprehensive educational campaign in schools (K-12) to
deglamorize guns and gun ownership and tell the truth about the Second Amendment.
(B) A well-funded, concerted campaign to eliminate the Second Amendment via constitutional
amendment.
(C) Provide revenue source for enforcement of new laws.
(D) Provide offsetting monetary fund for medical and legal services to victims of gun violence.
(E) Establish nationwide system of toll-free numbers for reporting violators of new gun
restrictions and non-licensees, a sum set aside for cash rewards for tips resulting in conviction.
Additional Revenue sources listed:
Range Licenses: $12,100 annually.
Range Tax: $85 per person, per visit.
Gun Dealer License: $600 annually.
Title 1 gun Mfg License: $6,000 annually.
Title 2 Gun Mfg License: $13,400 annually.
Revenue calculations concerning the above fees will depend on how the numbers of gun ranges,
gun range visitors, gun dealers and gun manufacturers are affected by increased fees. It is not
unreasonable to predict a 40% drop by the end of the first year, another 35% drop by the year
after that.
VI. Legal action and possible new revenue sources
Pending issues to be given at the appropriate time to the LCAV office for investigation as to
feasibility, implementation and public reaction. At no time should these suggestions be made
public before we can ascertain the current public reaction and provide the results of these
studies to the LCAV attorneys.
These are some ideas which are ahead of their time and would only be feasible through a
concerted P.R. campaign over time. A P.R. campaign includes press releases, press
conferences, direct lobbying and constant pressure via the national media. We must change the
way America thinks in regard to guns and gun owners in order to achieve a safe society for our
children in the upcoming century. We realize that one cannot implement every good idea
overnight, however, the following proposals have been forwarded for investigation as to
possible enaction within the next few years. A continued P.R. campaign with the general public
as well as the legal and judicial community, will enable us to finally get ground-breaking rulings
which can change the violent face of the American landscape for years to come.
Legal Point 1:
Making possible the suing of owners of guns, as a group, for monetary compensation for
victims of gun violence:
Once gun owners in America have been identified through a verifiable source, i.e., the pending
national computer registry, it would be possible to seek further compensation for victims of gun
violence through legal means. As a group, gun nuts would constitute an identifiable entity for
class-action suits and other legal actions for compensation to victims of gun violence.
Legal Point 2:
Suing Gun Organizations under the RICO (Racketeer Influenced, Corrupt Organization)
statute:
It would be expected that gun groups and lobbying groups such as the NRA would encourage
non-compliance. Thus nationally recognized groups will be technically "organizing to break the
law." Once this can be proven, these groups will be vulnerable to lawsuits based on the RICO
statute and drained of the financial resources through repeated legal action.
Legal Point 3:
Suing the makers of toy-replica guns, toy weapons and violent entertainment:
One of the purveyors of violence to society, companies which profit from violence would
eventually be identified and made legally responsible for the violent acts inspired by their
products. A study would have to be created to link these companies to those actions taken as a
result of their products. Threat of legal action would convince many manufacturers and
distributors that other nonviolence-related recreational materials and toys, would make them
fiscally accountable for the cost to society incurred as a result of their merchandise. Items could
include: violent video games, television shows, movies, videotapes, water guns, super soakers,
electronic noise guns, replica guns, toy weapons like swords, batons, martial arts items.
Tort law as we know it may not have to undergo a change in order to facilitate these actions. As
many people know, it is not necessary to actually win in order to affect change, since the
constant threat of legal action will induce change in the way people do business. People all
know that the real fiscal effect of repeated legal actions can bankrupt a peddler of violence just
as well as winning a large settlement.
Any additional ideas or proposals should be directed to our Washington D.C. office for
collation, investigation and discussion.
 
Last edited:
Brady II: The Objectives of the Gun Control Lobby:
In the early fall of 1994, the gun control movement achieved unprecedented success in Congress. The "Brady Bill" had been enacted in November 1993, and went into effect in February 1994. After a very tough political fight, President Clinton's omnibus crime bill was passed in August 1994. The bill included a 10-year ban on so-called "assault weapons," as well as other gun controls. Handgun Control, Inc. (which later changed its name to "The Brady Campaign" promptly began to push for legislation which it called "Brady II."

Although the bill was introduced, it did not receive a hearing in the final weeks of Congress before the election. The November 1994 elections resulted in a Republican landslide; in a December 1994 interview with the Cleveland Plain-Dealer, President Clinton stated that the NRA was the reason that the Republicans had won control of Congress.

Nevertheless, Brady II is worth remembering as a roadmap for the gun control lobby's hopes for "the next step" in federal gun control. Due to the results of the 1994 and subsequent elections, HCI/BC has not been so bold in its declared legislative agenda. It would be interesting to know which, if any, items from the Brady II bill are rejected today by the Brady Campaign or the political candidates which it has endorsed.

Arsenal licensing

Any person who owns 20 or more firearms or more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition or primers (e.g. two "bricks" of rimfire ammo) would be required to get an "arsenal" license. To obtain a federal arsenal license, a person would need to be fingerprinted, obtain permission of local zoning authorities, and pay a $300 tax every three years. Her home would be subjected to unannounced, warrantless inspection by the government up to three times a year. "Arsenal" owners would also have to obtain a $100,000 dollar insurance policy.

"Brady II" redefines "firearm" to include magazines and "any part of the action" (such as pins, springs, or screws). Thus, if a person has two Colt pistols, three Remington rifles, and four magazines (of any size) for each gun, then he own an "arsenal." Or if he owned two guns, six magazines, and a box of disassembled gun parts that contained five springs, five pins, and five screws, then he would own 23 "firearms" and would have to obtain an "arsenal" license.

Licensing

Every handgun buyer would be required to obtain a state handgun license. The license would be good for no more than two years. No-one could obtain a license without passing a state-controlled "safety" course. The fees for the license and the safety course would have no limits. The fees could be set far in excess of the state cost of providing the license and the course; instead, the fees could a source of general revenue.

Nothing would prevent licensing authorities from taking months or years to issue a license. And nothing would prevent the authorities from making the "safety" test so rigorous that almost no-one except an expert shooter could pass.

That an applicant had been shooting handguns for 50 years, or was an NRA certified safety instructor, or a proficient competitive target shooter would not exempt him from the requirement to pay for the government "safety" class.

Every handgun transfer (including one's adult son an old revolver) would be subject to these restrictions. In addition, every handgun transferred would have to be registered by make and serial number.

The late Pete Shields, the chair of HCI, in a 1976 interview, explained his strategy for using registration as a way-station to handgun confiscation:
"The first problem is to slow down the number of handguns being produced and sold in this country. The second problem is to get handguns registered. The final problem is to make possession of all handguns and all handgun ammunition--expect for the police, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors--totally illegal."

(Richard Harris, "A Reporter at Large: Handguns," New Yorker, July 26, 1976, p. 58).

The Brady Campaign currently denies that it wants to confiscate handguns. But, to the extent that the promise is sincere, is it more likely to be kept than the group's earlier (and broken) promise "our organization, Handgun Control, Inc. does not propose further controls on rifles and shotguns. Rifles and shotguns are not the problem; they are not concealable." (Pete Shields, Guns Don't Die--People Do, Priam Press, 1981, pp. 47-48).

Taxes

Currently, the price of guns and ammunition is increased by an 11% federal excise tax, revenues from which go to improve hunting habitat and to fund the development of target ranges. Brady II would increase the taxes to 30% on handguns, and 50% on ammunition. So a $500 pistol would cost $650, and a $20 box of ammunition would cost $30.

The tax revenues, instead of being spent on the shooting sports, would be spent on health care.

Persons Barred from Gun Ownership

The list of persons banned by federallaw from owning any gun would be expanded. A person who got into a bar fight 20 years ago, and pleaded guilty to misdemeanor third-degree assault, would be barred (ex post facto) for the rest of his life from owning any gun. (And subject to a mandatory five years in federal prison for a violation.) Any other crime, no matter, how petty, that involved the use or threatened use of force would likewise become a lifetime prohibition.

Possession of handguns or handgun ammunition by a person under the age of 21, or possession of any guns or ammunition by a person under the age of 16, would be illegal. Leetting one's 15 year old nephew borrow a single-shot .22 rifle to go target-shooting on one's own farm would be a federal crime. Gun possession under immediate adult supervsion would still be allowed.

Gun and Magazine Bans

All magazines which hold more than 6 rounds would be outlawed. Possession of existing magazines with a larger capacity would be allowed under the same terms as currently applicable to possession of machine guns: a 10-point FBI fingerprint; an expensive federal tax; and possession only allowed if a letter of authorization from the local police chief is obtained.

"Saturday Night Specials" would be outlawed. They would be defined as:
1. A handgun with any parts made of zinc alloy.
2. Any handgun that uses .22 short ammunition. Many guns that use .22 long rifle can also use .22 short, and would thus be banned.
3. Any revolver with a barrel less than 3 inches.
4. Any semi-automatic pistol with combined height and length of less than 10 inches.
5. Any seme-automatic pistol without a "positive manually operated safety device."

Other Provisions

It would become a federal crime to buy more than one handgun a month.

A permanent 7-day waiting period would be imposed on all handgun transfers (including gifts between family members).

All firearms would have to be "properly stored" is prevent access by anyone under the age of 16.

Gun shows would be destroyed, since licensed firearms dealers would not be allowed to sell guns at the show.

If "Brady II" had become law, what would have been the key to "Brady III" or "Brady IV"? Mrs. Brady has already told us.

She wants a "needs-based licensing" system, under which no one could own any gun unless the local police chief decided that the person "needed" to have the gun. (Erik Eckhom, "A Little Gun Control, a Lot of Guns," New York Times, Aug. 15, 1993, p. B1).

Ownership of a gun for protection would not be considered a legitimate "need." Says Mrs. Brady "To me, the only reason for guns in civilian hands is for sporting purposes." (Tom Jackson, "Keeping the Battle Alive," Tampa Tribune, Oct. 21, 1993.)

--------------------------------------------------------------


;)
 
"We hope that this point system can eventually be expanded to high powered airguns and "paint ball" weapons, which can inflict great damage, and with a little effort can be converted to real guns. "

LOL! I had no idea my paintball guns were so dangerous. I know it says right on it, "this is not a toy", but still... Maybe I should pull them out of mothballs and "convert" them to "real guns".
 
"We hope that this point system can eventually be expanded to high powered airguns and "paint ball" weapons, which can inflict great damage, and with a little effort can be converted to real guns. "

LOL! I had no idea my paintball guns were so dangerous. I know it says right on it, "this is not a toy", but still... Maybe I should pull them out of mothballs and "convert" them to "real guns".

Yep, the right air pressure and you'll be taking out airliners and satellites in no time!

:D
 
Wow, just wow.
What are they gonna do about all the kids getting "paramilitary" training through call of duty and airsoft?
And once america is gunfree what are they going to name it? I mean america was built on freedom, which absolutly has to consist of self reliance including defending yourself. To remove one of the original 10 amendments would be going back to great Britian, which would in effect destroy everything our founding fathers fought for.
(Preaching to the choir here, oh well, I guess it helps us formulate our arguments.)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top