Bush’s approval rating falls to new low

Status
Not open for further replies.

rick_reno

member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
3,027
This can't be right - here we have real LEADER in the White House and people aren't happy. Why, he's even cutting his vacation short by 2 WHOLE DAYS because he wants to help with the hurricane problems.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9137364/

Bush’s approval rating falls to new low
53 percent say they disapprove of president in new Post-ABC survey

Updated: 12:02 a.m. ET Aug. 31, 2005
Rising gas prices and ongoing bloodshed in Iraq continue to take their toll on President Bush, whose standing with the public has sunk to an all-time low, according to the latest Washington Post-ABC News poll.

The survey found Bush's job approval rating at 45 percent, down seven points since January and the lowest ever recorded for the president in Post-ABC surveys. Fifty-three percent disapproved of the job Bush is doing.

The war has been a drag on Bush's presidency for many months, but his Iraq approval ratings in the new poll were little changed from two months ago, despite widespread violence, a rash of U.S. casualties, antiwar protests outside the president's Texas ranch and a growing debate about reducing U.S. troop levels.

What may have pushed Bush's overall ratings down in the latest poll is pervasive dissatisfaction over soaring gasoline prices. Two-thirds of those surveyed said gas prices are causing financial hardship to them or their families. Gas prices stand to go even higher after Hurricane Katrina's rampage through the oil-rich Gulf of Mexico.

More ominously for the president, six in 10 Americans said there are steps the administration could take to reduce gas prices. Slightly more than a third say the recent run-up has been due to factors beyond the administration's control.

"I supported him last year," said Gina Coleman, 29, a homemaker living in Camden County, N.J. "I wouldn't vote for him again. It's gas prices, the war -- just the way he has been handling things. The rise in gas is something that has been happening for a long time, and the prices are getting worse. This makes me feel more negative about him, definitely."

Bush also received negative marks for his handling of immigration, the economy and Social Security, although his ratings on the latter two were not as low as they were two months ago. A majority of Americans supported his handling of the campaign against terrorism.

Bad news for Congress, Democrats, too
The poll numbers paint a portrait of national frustration with the direction and leadership of the country, which, if not reversed in coming months, is likely to color the environment for next year's midterm elections, putting incumbents in both parties on the defensive.

Dissatisfaction is not limited to the president. Fewer than four in 10 Americans -- 37 percent -- approve of the way the Republican-controlled Congress is doing its job, the lowest rating for lawmakers in nearly eight years.

The survey also provided bad news for Democratic leaders, who are judged as offering Bush only tepid opposition. Slightly more than half of those surveyed expressed dissatisfaction with congressional Democrats for not opposing Bush more aggressively.

Self-identified Democrats were particularly impatient. More than three in four said congressional Democrats have not gone far enough to oppose Bush on Iraq or on administration policies in general.

"Somebody needs to speak up," said Michelle Burgess, 41, a home health aide in St. Louis. "Enough is enough. I don't understand why we're over there in Iraq or what he's doing on other issues. There are too many lives being lost."

Independents were similarly dissatisfied with Democratic leaders for not challenging the president over the war and other issues, with six in 10 saying Democrats have been too meek.

Public attitudes toward the war have not changed significantly since the first of the year, the poll found. Slightly more than four in 10 -- 42 percent -- approved of the job Bush is doing in Iraq; 57 percent disapproved, unchanged in recent months. Slightly more than half -- 53 percent -- said the war was not worth it, while 46 percent said it was, identical to the results of a Post-ABC poll two months ago. By a 51 percent to 38 percent ratio, the public said the United States is winning the war, despite mounting casualties and insurgent attacks.

A majority (54 percent) continued to say the United States should keep military forces in Iraq until civil order is restored there; 44 percent said U.S. forces should be withdrawn. Six in 10 opposed announcing a timetable for withdrawal. Only about one in eight -- 13 percent -- said U.S. forces should be withdrawn immediately.

Michael Strickland, 31, a factory worker who lives in Pine Bluff, Ark., said he opposed the war before the United States invaded in March 2003: " It's just another Vietnam. . . . No matter what we do over there, they are going to kill us."

His solution: withdraw -- but not immediately. "Don't tell them when we're going to leave. . . . But do it in a reasonable time frame -- six months to a year. Even if we leave, it can't get any worse over there."

These ambivalent feelings about the war and Bush's policies in Iraq are felt even by many of his supporters who continue to back the U.S. invasion.

‘Really mixed feelings’
"I have really mixed feelings, like probably the whole country has," said Wayne Almlie, 51, a warehouse worker and part-time pastor in Des Moines, who said he approves of Bush's overall performance. "We need to stay the course. I really think we do. The whole region would disintegrate if we would pull out. . . . I'd hate to have to be making those decision."

Despite escalating bloodshed, the struggles to approve a draft constitution and the well-covered antiwar protests led by Cindy Sheehan, whose son was killed in Iraq, the survey found little evidence that antiwar sentiment has increased the past two months.

The survey also found that Sheehan, who has been protesting the war outside Bush's ranch near Crawford, Tex., has become the most visible symbol of the antiwar movement. Fully three in four Americans have heard or read about her.

Sheehan met last year with Bush at an event for military families and has been seeking another meeting with him. Slightly more than half of the country -- 52 percent -- said Bush should meet her again; 46 percent said he should not. Fifty-three percent supported what she is doing and 42 percent opposed.

The poll found that opposition to the war has deepened among Democrats. Two months ago, two in three Democrats said they strongly disapproved of Bush's handling of Iraq; that has risen to three in four. Over that same period, the proportion of Democrats who described themselves as "angry" over Bush's Iraq policies has risen from 36 percent to 46 percent.

The poll found that Sheehan's activities may have helped increase support for the war among Bush supporters. Although eight in 10 Americans said Sheehan's protests have not changed their attitudes toward the war, one in 10 said she has made them more likely to support the conflict -- the same proportion that said she has made them less likely to support the war.

A total of 1,006 randomly selected adults were interviewed by telephone Aug. 25-28. The margin of sampling error for the results is plus or minus three percentage points.
 
Last edited:
A poll by leftists for leftists. What do you expect?

Same thing with the article.

People are so blinded by propoganda it's sickening.
 
Rising gas prices and ongoing bloodshed in Iraq continue
How could this happen, wasn't the war about oil? Don't we control the oil fields?

Almost makes you think that there might actually have been a real reason to go to war. :rolleyes:
 
I don't see how a Dem could make things better.

If a Dem pulls ouf of Iraq that makes things worse (re-arm and train them all, then leave and let them fight each other, great f'ing ideal)

If a Dem gets in promising to lower gas prices, then it will just hurt even worse a few years later when they can't afford to subsidize them anymore.

I don't see what they could do, besides cancel the trillion dollar tax-cut. And the R's are going to have to do that anyway, or raise everyone's taxes.

Maybe this will be the big year for L's
 
Well if the tax cuts goes everyone who pays Federal taxes will get their taxes raised cause all tax payers got a cut. Those on the bottom got the biggest percentage cut. Some got completly cut off the tax roll.
 
"I supported him last year," said Gina Coleman, 29, a homemaker living in Camden County, N.J. "I wouldn't vote for him again. It's gas prices, the war -- just the way he has been handling things. The rise in gas is something that has been happening for a long time, and the prices are getting worse. This makes me feel more negative about him, definitely."

Sadly, this kind of ignorance is (appearently) displayed by ~53% of the population (or of the 1006 people surveyed :rolleyes: ). Somebody who has been listenting to gossip and taking it as gospel. If there is a more trite embodiement of this mentality, someone show me. Same cliche, different day.
 
ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahaah

oh yeAh tell me again about my tax cut. $300 . thanks dubya. how'd you know i'd be giving it right back to you and your buddies for diesel?

i'd have felt better leaving it in the till. maybe our soldiers could have bought some armor.
?????????????????????
 
+1 Thorn76

The four tax cuts have been by far the most shamelessly corrupt / abjectly incompetent thing Bush and co. ever did (depending on what you attribute it to). The trickle-down economy is just another blatant lie to make the rich richer, the poor poorer, and the government weaker and more betrothed to sheiks' oil money. They take your money and freedoms away and give you lies, fear, and religious fundamentalist gay-bashing swivel in return. Nice scam.

And no, the way to control oil prices is confiscate and export Iraqi oil and drive the price down by increased supply. Freedom and progress are not free. If somebody is paying, why shouldn't it be the primary beneficiaries?
 
"I supported him last year," said Gina Coleman, 29, a homemaker living in Camden County, N.J. "I wouldn't vote for him again. It's gas prices, the war -- just the way he has been handling things. The rise in gas is something that has been happening for a long time, and the prices are getting worse. This makes me feel more negative about him, definitely."

Also shows how informed the public is, you cant vote for him again, cause he cant run again.
 
MSN has never been a bastion of accurate reporting.
Funny, some here are of the opion that since the MSM give glowing reports of the way Mr. Bush has handled the disaster in NO, he's on top of things. :confused: Never mind his lip service to the invasion from the south and his putting the Democrats to shame with his "Fiscal Conservatism".
 
I'm extremely dissaticefied with Bush's handling of the war, in particular his decision to get involved in the first place. I'm right here in the middle of the illegal immigration highway, and I actually don't object to the way it's being handled right now. I don't really object to the gas prices; it's a free market, and as gas prices get higher, alternatives will come onto the market. Biodiesel for instance. I'm all in favor of his Social Security plans. I wish they went further even. In fact the Social Security reform is the big thing. I think it is not widely understood how important (and good) self-directed investment is.
 
I'm extremely dissaticefied with Bush's handling of the war, in particular his decision to get involved in the first place

I agree, but it was GHWB the elder who got us into this mess 15 years ago. We've been there since, in varying degrees of heat. GWB the younger seemed to use 9/11 as a pretense to turn up the heat. Finish Dad's blunder.

Now we've deposed the only thug who seemed to be able to keep the country stable (if not exactly happy), so we have to stay to figure out how to keep the Iranians and Taliban from taking over and doing their own brand of ethnic cleansing. That, and we still want the oil to flow, not a big priority for Talibans.

Regards.
 
"Why, he's even cutting his vacation short by 2 WHOLE DAYS because he wants to help with the hurricane problems. Imagine that!"

Dude, your attitude is hanging out. Don't trip over it and hurt yourself. ;)

John
 
Seems to me that Bush, on most issues, actually goes from principle rather than poll numbers. While I don't agree with all of those decisions, I can certainly respect the approach. That's part of why I voted for the man.

Of course, that same approach will get you in hot water from time to time. Especially when it seems most folks out there expect every problem to be nicely resolved in one hour, less commercial breaks. :rolleyes:
 
I have never once been polled to see how I think a president is doing. Has anyone else here?

Greg
 
Not I. Does anyone know how many people are polled?

It seems to me, that most of the surveys I see, are taken with a sample of about 1000 people. That might have been fine years ago when technology wasn't so good, but nowadays, you really oughta be able to poll more than a few thousand people.

And in all honesty, I don't see what the President should have to do with oil prices. Pricing of a product is not a President's job, as far as I know.
 
Bush

I'd like to see an approval poll done on the Washington Post-ABC News. Now that that would be interesting. :barf:
 
The survey found Bush's job approval rating at 45 percent

I am surprised it is that high. Bush has really done some sorry things for us during the last 5 years, and I don't see why my fellow Republicans continue to support him. He has hurt conservative causes more than he has helped. I guess party politics and partisanship outweigh the political ideals of most conservatives. The best I can say for him is he is better than Gore or Kerry would have been.
 
[/QUOTE]I am surprised it is that high. Bush has really done some sorry things for us during the last 5 years, and I don't see why my fellow Republicans continue to support him. He has hurt conservative causes more than he has helped. I guess party politics and partisanship outweigh the political ideals of most conservatives. The best I can say for him is he is better than Gore or Kerry would have been.
That nails it for me also.
 
The best I can say for him is he is better than Gore or Kerry would have been.

He is a LOT better than either one of those clowns would have been. His job now is to pave the road for Hillary, and he's exceding expectations on that task.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top