Poll: Most think Bush is failing second term

Status
Not open for further replies.

rick_reno

member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
3,027
How can this be? Don't these people realize that President Bush is the greatest leader of our time? I expect we'll discover this "poll" was taken in Syria, or maybe Lebanon. These can't be Americans who think our leader is failing.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/26/bush.poll/index.html

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A majority of Americans are more likely to vote for a candidate in November's congressional elections who opposes President Bush, and 58 percent consider his second term a failure so far, according to a poll released Thursday.

Fewer people consider Bush to be honest and trustworthy now than did a year ago, and 53 percent said they believe his administration deliberately misled the public about Iraq's purported weapons program before the U.S. invasion in 2003, the CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll found.

Pollsters interviewed 1,006 American adults Friday through Sunday. Most questions in the survey had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. (Poll)

Bush is preparing for his State of the Union address, set for next week, and told reporters Thursday that he is "looking forward" to campaigning for Republicans in November's elections. (Full story)

But the latest poll indicated Americans remain in a pessimistic mood.

Fifty-eight percent of those polled said Bush's second term has been a failure so far, while 38 percent said they consider it a success. A smaller number -- 52 percent -- consider his entire presidency a failure to date, with 46 percent calling it successful. (Complete poll results)

In the latter case, the numbers fall within those two questions' margin of sampling error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points.

Bush defended his performance Thursday, pointing to an improved economy despite higher prices for gasoline, heating oil and natural gas. He said the November elections would be about "peace and prosperity."

"We've got a record, and a good one," he said. "That's what I intend to campaign on and explain to people why I made the decisions I made, and why they're necessary to protect the American people, and why they've been necessary to keep this economy strong -- and why the policies we've got will keep this economy strong in the future."

But 51 percent of those polled said they were more likely to vote for a candidate in congressional elections who opposes Bush, while 40 percent said they were likely to vote for a candidate who backs the president.

Bush's own approval rating remained at 43 percent, unchanged since mid-December, according to results released earlier this week. Another 54 percent disapproved of his job performance, that survey found.

Nearly two-thirds of those surveyed in the latest poll -- 62 percent -- said they were dissatisfied with the way things are going in the United States, while 35 percent said they were satisfied.

And 64 percent said things in the United States have gotten worse in the past five years, while 28 percent said things have improved.

For the first time since Bush took office in 2001, a majority of those polled said the president -- who campaigned as "a uniter, not a divider" -- has been a divisive leader. Fifty-four percent called Bush a divider, while 41 percent called him a uniter.

Just over a third -- 34 percent -- said Bush had a clear plan for solving the nation's problems, and 44 percent agreed that he cared about the needs of people like them and shared their values.

A narrow majority of 51 percent said they consider Bush to be a strong and decisive leader, compared with 48 percent who disagreed. Although those totals fall within the margin of sampling error, they mark a decline from a year ago, when 61 percent called the president strong and decisive.

Split on honesty
Americans were divided evenly -- 49-49 -- on the question of Bush's honesty.

The number of those polled who consider Bush trustworthy improved from a November survey, when only 46 percent rated him honest. But the figure is down from a year ago, when 56 percent considered him honest and trustworthy, and only 41 percent disapproved.

Specifically, 53 percent said they believe his administration deliberately misled the public about whether Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, as Bush and other top officials argued on the eve of the March 2003 invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein.

Once Hussein was overthrown, U.S. inspectors concluded that Iraq had not kept stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, long-range missiles and a nuclear weapons program, though Iraq had concealed weapons-related research from the United Nations.

U.S. troops are battling a persistent insurgency in Iraq, with two soldiers killed in combat Wednesday, raising the American death toll to 2,238. More than 2,000 of those have died since Bush declared an end to "major combat operations" May 1, 2003.

The war in Iraq topped the list of respondents' concerns going into 2006, with 58 percent calling it extremely important. Terrorism was next with 57 percent, followed by health care with 47 percent, the economy at 46 percent and corruption at 45 percent.

Most of those polled said they believe the United States will have a "significant number" of troops in Iraq for more than a year, with 47 percent believing the U.S. commitment will last one to three years and 33 percent believing the U.S. presence will last longer than that.

Thirty-four percent said they considered economic conditions good and 5 percent excellent, while 41 percent rated the economy fair and 18 percent poor.

Asked which way the economy was headed, 35 percent said they believed it was improving; 54 percent said it was getting worse.

Economic growth has picked up in recent months, and unemployment has declined since 2003. But gasoline prices remain well over $2 a gallon on average, and natural gas and heating oil bills have gone up since 2005.
 
A poll can be formulated to show....

any results you want. Bush doesn't look at polls which drives the liberals crazy because slick ruled by the poll, and the news media is in the liberals pocket.........chris3
 
ball3006 said:
any results you want. Bush doesn't look at polls which drives the liberals crazy because slick ruled by the poll, and the news media is in the liberals pocket.........chris3

That statement can also be interepreted to mean that he doesn't care what the American people think.

As evidenced by his stance on illegal immigration...
 
POLLS

NEVER RELY ON POLLS. Think. If you conduct a poll at Democrat headquaqters, you will find they only like Democrat presidents. If my memory serves me right, I think several news agencies have been caught in blatent lies. I seem to recal some polling companies have been at least accused of polls on misleading or false premises. It would be in everyones best interest to actually research actions and statements concerning politics. There are some who believe the president said saddam hussen or however you spell it had weapons of mass destruction. No one can back that up with factual information. I do recall he said iraq was working on developing WMDs. The news services say something and those who have to be told how to think accept it as truth. I prefer to think for myself. Remember the first terrible thing this president did? I do. He attended bible studies in the white house. The last president treated the white house like a cat house. :banghead:
 
How can this be? Don't these people realize that President Bush is the greatest leader of our time? I expect we'll discover this "poll" was taken in Syria, or maybe Lebanon. These can't be Americans who think our leader is failing.
Welcome to Rick Reno's personal weblog.
 
/*Asked which way the economy was headed, 35 percent said they believed it was improving; 54 percent said it was getting worse*/

Okay, that is what they the American public said. This is what they know:

"...And despite the extensive media attention focused on employment numbers, almost two-thirds of the public don’t know that there has been a net increase in jobs this year." (Ilya Somin, George Mason University)

Again, what the majority of the American people said:

/*Fifty-eight percent of those polled said Bush's second term has been a failure so far*/

...and what they know:

"...the majority of Americans don't know the name of their congressman, which branch of government is responsible for which issues and the basic differences between liberalism and conservatism. Immediately after the 2002 congressional elections, only 32 percent knew that the Republicans had held control of the U.S. House of Representatives" (Ilya Somin, Professor, George Mason University)

and the coup de grace for anyone putting stock into the results of a poll:

"...Overall, the Post-Harvard survey found that more than half of all Americans agreed with the following statement: “Politics and government are so complicated that a person like me can’t really understand what’s going on.” (Washington Post survey)

I would know sooner follow a poll for wisdom than I would follow lemmings to safety.
 
Ultimately the only polls that count are the voting polls. If there is a groundswell rising against the Bush administration like I sense there is, we could end up with a whole bunch of Democratic twinkies moving into new offices in Washington D.C. in just about a year from now.

What gun related item we talkin about , I seem to have forgot.

I sense that a bunch of folks who don't like the direction some of these conversations are taking might just find out what all this has to do with guns and the Second Amendment the hard way, if my hunch about major mid-term backlash against the ruling party proves correct.
 
rick_reno said:
How can this be?

The numbers sound about the same as the last approval rating ~40%. Once you disapprove of George Bush, you have the disease and the man can't do anything right, so where's the news here?
 
RealGun said:
The numbers sound about the same as the last approval rating ~40%. Once you disapprove of George Bush, you have the disease and the man can't do anything right, so where's the news here?
What you call a disease, some call a cure.
;)
Biker
 
Funny how the president's men have a feel-good explanation for everything.

1) ignored OBL before 9/11 - "no actionable intelligence"
2) must get Saddam - "WMD, terrorist connections"
3) war expenses - "oh, 8 billion, give or take"
5) no WMD - "trucks to Syria at night"
6) 200 billion - "well, it will cost whatever it costs"
7) criticism of war - "they hate the troops"
8) criticism of admin - "they are not patriots"
9) caught spying - "somehow, it is not illegal"
10) failure at polls - "the media are liberal"

I can't wait to see the next lame excuse. Pathetic.
 
At heart, I'm a Libertarian. With my mind, I've voted Republican almost exclusively because they're closest to my ideals. George Bush is the worst president that I've voted for. That said, he's still about 100 times better than Gore or Kerry. The Right can do much better.

We need an iron fist in a velvet glove. JFK's foreign policies were immeasurably better than our current president's.
 
I remember the JFK years. He didn't have a foreign policy during his 1000 days in office, did he? Other than ultimately denying the promised air support to the Bay of Pigs invasion, what did he accomplish? Oh okay, he did support the Nam war.

John
 
the problem that i have with these polls is that they assume value judgements.

i WANT bush to be a divider, not a uniter. i'm fairly certain that the conservative base that elected him did so because it wanted to throw down with the liberals; to have it out one way or another and stop the absurd compromising.

i don't trust bush, because i don't trust ANY politician or part of gov. in fact, i don't trust person at all. i do not automatically believe everything everyone says is true. that's not paranoia, it's the nature of critical thinking.

some portion of the 58% who consider his administration a failure believe it to be so because he's not persuing a socialist agenda, while another portion believe it's a failure because he's not persuing a conservative agenda. others believe it's because we have troops in iraq, and others because we don't have enough troops in iraq.

the poll is essentially meaningless.

and most of the regurgitation of pro/anti-bush crap is becoming tiresome.
 
Today I almost came to the conclusion that bad as Gore might have been, he might have handled the Middle Eastern situation better than Bush.

At the same time I decided that Bush has probably more or less done the right things regarding the Middle East. He has just done the right things in a horribly incompetent, ham-fisted fashion. I believe the war in Iraq as well as the upcoming war in Iran was not about oil, but neither wars are/will be about weapons of mass destruction. The Middle Eastern wars will be about protecting the value of our dollar and ultimately our way of life. War may well be the only way to accomplish this.

That said, the reason I think Gore might have handled it better is because Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld have handled the entire situation in the most incompetent way imagineable. If this had to be done, then our leaders needed to rally the people of the United States and of the developed world behind such actions. Acting on (and probably exaggerating) questionable intelligence was a pretty poor way to attempt to do this.

Do I think Gore could have done any better? I'm not sure; I am sure that no president could have done a worse job of this.

Flame on.
 
Republicans are in trouble. I say this because I see here in the heart of Bush Country a very real and growing disatisfaction with Bush and his neo-con cronies.
I hear people who have voted a straight Republican ticket since Ronald Reagan
express disgust and dismay over the policies of this administration. What are the folks upset about. Let's see, hmmm, well there is the belief that Bush and company cooked the books and trumped up the WMD excuse to go into the quagmire that Iraq has become. Did the Bush administration lie to the American people or were they just wrong? Liars or incompetents which is worse? There is the immigration issue that the government softsells and tries mightly to ignore.
Then there is the economy. For the average middle class American things are getting worse not better. Prices are up, real income is down. Ford just announced it will layoff 25 to 35,000 workers. Good paying manufacturing jobs,
the kind of jobs that allowed America become what it is. The Bush administration
claims a real increase in jobs, but what kind of jobs? Most of the jobs that are being created are low paying jobs that will not support a decent living.
For lots of working class Americans, their real purchasing power is less in 2006 than it was just a few years ago. People are afraid of their jobs being shipped off to China or India. They watch the price of gasoline, the cost of their health insurance skyrocket and their wages stay the same or increase 2 or 3 percent annually. They see Bush and Co. claim that the economy is strong when they know it's not. There is a growing disconnect between these folks and the current government.

Lots of folks who voted for Bush in 2000 and 20004 now can't stand the sight of him. The Republicans have squandered a great opportunity in the last few years, and it seems as if they don't realize it or just don't care.

They are in for a very rude surprise.
 
Lobotomy Boy said:
Do I think Gore could have done any better? I'm not sure; I am sure that no president could have done a worse job of this.

Flame on.

I agree, and I believe that Donald Rumsfeld will go down as the worse SecDef to date bar none. War with Iran is looming and Rummy still wants to reduce the size of the already too small Army! :banghead: We need a good infantryman as SecDef for a change.:)
 
progunner1957 said:
I'm sure that most Demosocialists think Bush is failing; as for the rest of the nation, I seriously doubt it...:D
Way to contribute there, slugger.
;)
So, you're saying that anyone who belives that Bush is failing is a "Demosocialist"?
Biker
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top