I just quoted one of his articles. La Voz de Aztlan is a known and openly anti-semitic paper...why would he use that to prove a "fact" when that paper goes out of its way to express anti-semitic hatred?
Yeah, I know the standard line..."I don't hate all jews, just Israelis (and anyone who supports them)". I agree that criticism of Israel is not anti-semitic. I do it myself all the time. That doesn't mean however that any criticism of Israel is not anti-semitic...I've been reading these articles, and they are a rehash of classic Jewish conspiracy theories.
Here are some of the claims also listed:
"Israeli blackmailed Clinton with secret Israeli spy video from the whitehouse"
"Israeli interests can listen to any phone conversation in America on large providers" (What is an "israeli interest??" Look suspiciously like "Execs and corps with Jewish leadership")
"Who really owns congress?" (Parts 1-4)
No, he doesn't come out on the website and say he's anti-semitic. My point is, this evidence is so specious and unreliable, there is clearly another motivation he has for posting it. You have to make huge leaps of the imagination for any of these Israeli-conspiracy theories to make sense, and what I'm arguing is that the motivation for making those leaps is more often than not anti-Semitism. I'm assuming here that a neutral pair of eyes will look at most of this info and say "ha! reminds me of the National Enquirer articles my babysitter used to read"...so if you look at this and say "hmm, these are good facts", there's probably a motivation other than bare concern for the truth.