Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Carrying a 1911 without the safety on?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by CPshooter, Dec 25, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CPshooter

    CPshooter Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,420
    I've recently stepped into the world of 1911s, and with the purchase of an ultra carry II I am now going to be carrying one exclusively in place of my other guns. Carrying with a safety on is very comforting as far as accidental discharges go, but some will argue that a manual safety is a bad thing when crap hits the fan. I don't know how I feel yet, since I'm still transitioning into the 1911 platform. Then I started thinking, why is the manual safety even necessary?

    On a Glock (which I currently carry), if something pulls the trigger intentionally or even unintentionally, it will go boom without a doubt. A 1911 on the other hand won't go off unless you have the grip safety depressed. Why is the Springfield XD considered safe for carry with no manual safety and the 1911 isn't?

    Obviously 1911s have a shorter trigger pull being single-action and all, but doesn't the grip safety add a significant safety element to the design?

    Also, I realize that IF this was to be done, extreme caution would need to be taken when reholstering the gun.

    What do you guys think? (Sorry if this has been covered before, but hey, bandwidth isn't a real concern these days anyhow:))
     
  2. denfoote

    denfoote Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,622
    Location:
    Near the border of occupied Azlan and Mexico.
    JMB just spun!!

    You aren't insane are you??
    Cocked and Locked is the way the 1911 was designed to be carried!! :what:
     
  3. Kind of Blued

    Kind of Blued Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2007
    Messages:
    3,676
    Location:
    Rocky Mountains
    The XD has a 5.5-7.7 lb. trigger pull. I believe it also requires more trigger travel for a discharge.

    Absolutely do NOT carry a 1911 with the thumb safety disengaged. Figure out the internals of the gun if you want a well-substantiated reason.

    Disengaging the thumb safety during the draw is (to me) extremely "natural" feeling. I've never failed to disengage it during a draw. That being said, I went through 500 rounds drawing while disengaging the safety, shooting a pair, and reholstering after re-engaging the safety.

    I'm sure you'll be able to get used to it, likely even to the point where you "swipe" your Glock when you draw should you practice with the 1911 enough. You might not even notice that you're doing it though.

    If you can't get used to dis-engaging the thumb safety, go back to the Glock, or something else. It's that important in my opinion.
     
  4. RON in PA

    RON in PA Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,062
    Location:
    S.E. PA, USA
    Actually the 1911 was carried by the military with an empty chamber, condition 3.
     
  5. notorious

    notorious Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,094
    Location:
    Behind Enemy Lines
    Yep, military carries it condition 3 but the police do it in cocked and locked fashion.

    I wouldn't try it unlocked, but that's just me.
     
  6. AirForceShooter

    AirForceShooter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    Messages:
    2,766
    Location:
    Central Florida
    I've carried my 1911 for over 40 years in condition Zero.
    It's just like a Glock.
    Maybe even better. There are still 2 safety's. The grip and the trigger.

    In 1960 try finding an ambi safety. It's what I started witH and just stayed with.

    I've never considered it unsafe.

    AFS
     
  7. 1911Tuner

    1911Tuner Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    May 22, 2003
    Messages:
    18,550
    Location:
    Lexington,North Carolina...or thereabouts
    Myth. Browning designed the gun to give the user a choice in the mode of carry. According to military doctrine, Cocked and locked was doable "When action is iminent."

    The thumb safety wasn't even part of Browning's original prototype. It was added on request from the US cavalry just prior to the final design that went on to beat Savage's offering in a 6,000 round torture test.

    Here's a picture of the 1910 model that was examined by the Army Ordnance Board before the thumb safety was added.

    1910.gif
     
  8. Old Fuff

    Old Fuff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,908
    Location:
    Arizona
    Also for the record, all of Browning's .38 pistols that preceeded the 1911, and well as all of the prototype .45's made from 1904 to 1910, and the Colt commercial model 1905 .45 pistol - didn't have manual safties - nor did they have grip safties. :eek:

    He didn't think they were necessary on a pistol that had an external hammer, but the Army did.

    From 1900 to after World War Two the common practice was to carry the Colt pistols (and most others) with the chamber empty and magazine loaded, or in the case of the 1911, with the hammer down on a loaded chamber. Cocked & locked carry didn't become popular until Jeff Cooper came along during the middle-late 1970's.

    These days, when cocked & locked carry is considered the only way to go, the safety lock/manual safety should be "on". There is plenty of time to push it off between the time the pistol is drawn, and when it it presented and pointed. The Old Fuff is aware that some people carry the piece with the manual safety off, but I don't think that they pick up any speed in getting the shot off, and they do take an unnecessary risk.
     
  9. Treo

    Treo member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Messages:
    3,110
    Location:
    Co. Springs
    Which makes sense considering they were carrying it on the back of a half wild horse.

    My two cents to the thread, I personally don't carry my 1911 anymore in favor of a CZ75B in DA mode. I chose the Z ( or more accurately the mode I carry it in) because I don't trust myself to remember to swipe the safety ( If you do that's fine, I don't and I'm not going to bet my life on the difference) I would never consider carrying any weapon in SA with the safety disengaged, that only has to go wrong one time.

    My vote is W/ the guy that said either train yourself until you're confident W/the safety on the 1911 or go back to your GLOCK.
     
  10. Dr_2_B

    Dr_2_B Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,850
    Location:
    midwest
    AFShooter, I'm actually shocked. Do you really carry it chamber loaded and without safety engaged? Scares me to death to think of it. I haven't ccw'd my 1911 because it has an ambi safety and I know that could be disengaged inadvertently. Do you know anyone else who does this? What make do you carry?
     
  11. FoMoGo

    FoMoGo Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2007
    Messages:
    880
    Location:
    Andreas Pa, 18211
    It isnt hard to train yourself to wipe the safety on the draw.
    Unload it, check to see that its unloaded... check again... look in the chamber... make sure the Mag is out... then practice your draw.
    Some wipe the safety on the draw, some wipe it on presentation.
    I honestly have to make a conscious effort to NOT wipe the safety when pulling the pistol from the holster.
    It becomes muscle memory and an automatic part of the draw.


    Jim
     
  12. FoMoGo

    FoMoGo Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2007
    Messages:
    880
    Location:
    Andreas Pa, 18211
    Mine has the ambi safety also... and it is going away for a left side safety, due to the ease of accidentally disengaging it.
    However, I carry in a retention holster that covers the trigger... so it doesnt bother me THAT much.
    I would just rather be the one who makes the conscious decision on if the safety is on or not.
    A 1911 in condition zero, cocked and unlocked, is like a glock with a lighter trigger.
    I know it is not going to go off on its own, and I stay off the trigger till I am on target.


    Jim
     
  13. Geno
    • Contributing Member

    Geno Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    15,290
    Sitting here, just returned from the gas station. I carried my Colt Commander .45 ACP, loaded, chambered, and the manual safety off. I carried my Glock 26 on my ankle as a back-up. So, which was more "safe"? Neither, it's the same, and both perfectly safe. I've never had an accident with any pistol, because I understand that fingers-off-triggers is the not only the best safety, it is the only true safety.
     
  14. possum

    possum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,942
    Location:
    Concord, N.C.
    if you don't feel comfortable with the safety on the 1911, you need to train on that weapon system. I own a 1911, but i don't carry it, if i was to transition to the 1911, i would do alot of extensive training with it, to get to where knocking the saftey off is second nature and natural like it is on my ar when i shoot it.
     
  15. PO2Hammer

    PO2Hammer Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    3,245
    Location:
    MINNESOTA
    +1

    Personaly, I think you're trying to yank our chains, I can't believe you would actually re-holster a 1911 with the safety off on purpose.
     
    Last edited: Dec 25, 2008
  16. 1911Tuner

    1911Tuner Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    May 22, 2003
    Messages:
    18,550
    Location:
    Lexington,North Carolina...or thereabouts
    Repetition is the key. You do it until it becomes an autoresponse to placing your hand on the butt of the gun. I find that my thumb goes through the motions even when I'm handling a revolver...and if I unholster a 1911 to clear it, I have to make a conscious effort not to wipe it off until the gun is pointed in a completely safe direction and the magazine removed.

    As far as being safe in Condition Zero...The trigger is still blocked by the grip safety, so as long as the gun is holstered and your hand clear of it...it should be okay. As Treo noted...it was added in order to enable the mounted cavalryman to place the gun on-safe and reholster when on the back of an unruly or frightened horse. Incidentally, that's also why a slide-locking safety was required. It kept the slide from pushed out of battery during reholstering...and possibly not returning to battery under dusty or muddy field conditions.

    Like the much-maligned pinch check...it can be safely done if one gets control of the hammer, and remembers to keep the web of the hand clear of the grip safety. In that respect, it's safer than reholstering a Glock...which has no grip safety and no hammer to control. There are many activities which carry potential risk...but that risk can be negated or even neutralized if one is careful, and maintains focus on the task.
     
  17. MythBuster

    MythBuster member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    360
    Once you get used to the 1911 system you are no more likely to forget to push the safety off as you are to pull the trigger.
     
  18. withdrawn34

    withdrawn34 Member.

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2008
    Messages:
    529
    The XD has a grip safety, which is why it is considered "safer" than a Glock, despite still not having any external safeties (although some mdoels have thumb safeties).

    Both pistols are plenty safe though if you keep your finger out of the trigger. Both still have trigger safeties.
     
  19. Deanimator

    Deanimator Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    10,916
    Location:
    Rocky River, Ohio
     
  20. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    48,949
    Location:
    Alabama
    Agreed

    Ditto
     
  21. orchidhunter

    orchidhunter member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    237
    I don't think the OP said he had a round in the chamber, he might be going around with the hammer back for ease in racking the slide. If he has one in the chamber, with the hammer back, he needs to have the saftey on, for his saftey and the saftey of others around him. Merry Xmas, orchidhunter
     
  22. RogersPrecision

    RogersPrecision Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    588
    Location:
    n az
    Carrying a 1911 in Condition Zero is a really, really bad idea.
    If anyone would even consider doing this, then obviously the 1911 is the wrong gun for them.
    :uhoh:
     
  23. Dr_2_B

    Dr_2_B Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,850
    Location:
    midwest
    Orchidhunter, pretty sure based on the context the OP is talking about carrying chamber loaded.

    I find it very interesting. I have avoided even carrying cocked and locked because of how easily the thing could discharge - especially with the fear that my ambi safety could be disengaged. My fears are not justified but I've found it hard to overcome them. OTOH, I carry GLOCKs and all my other pistols without any safety engaged. No concern at all.
     
  24. TAB

    TAB Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Messages:
    2,475
    its perfectly safe, but I would not do it.

    if your worried about taking the safety off, then a 1911 is not for you.
     
  25. orchidhunter

    orchidhunter member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    237
    matheath, Unfortunately for him and the others around him, you are probaly right. Merry Xmas, orchidhunter
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page