shiftyer1
Member
Ok I got to thinkin today at work while I was looking at a little keltec .380, Why do folks not chose the smallest acceptable caliber (.380, .9mm, .38 etc) carry weapon as a primary carry gun? Don't get me wrong if you can conceal a s & w .500 by all means go for it but why the choice for a larger frame when smaller guns are available?
I'm not talking about the guys that _____________ because thats what they have. Yes mag. capacity is a consideration but I feel 6 -9 rounds are realisticly enough for a self defense situation, if you can hit what you aim at and don't have 8 guys determined to harm or kill you in an action movie setting.
Wouldn't smaller be much more convienient and/or concealable than larger guns and have acceptable accuracy and reliability?
I also recently tried a sig p229 iwb on side and realized how OBVIOUS it was while I was wearing a semi baggy shirt. Which also caused my train of thought.
So whats the reason to carry bigger when smaller will do the job just fine? And I mean size NOT caliber.
I'm not talking about the guys that _____________ because thats what they have. Yes mag. capacity is a consideration but I feel 6 -9 rounds are realisticly enough for a self defense situation, if you can hit what you aim at and don't have 8 guys determined to harm or kill you in an action movie setting.
Wouldn't smaller be much more convienient and/or concealable than larger guns and have acceptable accuracy and reliability?
I also recently tried a sig p229 iwb on side and realized how OBVIOUS it was while I was wearing a semi baggy shirt. Which also caused my train of thought.
So whats the reason to carry bigger when smaller will do the job just fine? And I mean size NOT caliber.