Jim Watson
Member
See, see, you keep hammering "clip".
I seem to be the only one in step on correct usage of the other jargon I mentioned.
I seem to be the only one in step on correct usage of the other jargon I mentioned.
I'd been shooting for ~25 years before anyone told me that the two were not synonymous. . . .
Then I'd say the important part of the thread is resolved right?NEWS FLASH... the little lady said it's ok if I go get that Marlin for myself!!!! Woot
Damn, I hate language NAZIs!
Yes, it is technically incorrect to call a magazine a clip. It is also incorrect to call your automobile a "car." (cars run on tracks.) It is incorrect to call your weapon a "gun." (guns have wheels on them.)
Aren't there more important issues out there than dissing people who use an incorrect term when everybody knows darn well what they mean?
When I was a child in the 1950s, everyone, even police and soldiers called magazines "clips."
It didn't become an "issue" until "Goofy Jeffie" started whining about i in the gun rags.
Firefight, 1967, in a foxhole, and I yell 'Quick, throw me a magazine!!!!!
And I get hit up side the head with a tattered 1967 Playboy magazine with damp pages
Bingo. I work at a gun shop, and most of the time when people say "clip" I know what they mean; I never bother to correct them and I just assume they're talking about a magazine. But not always.Frank Ettin said:We can use language imprecisely to communicate in vague generalities which can be understood (or misunderstood) in various ways, in various contexts, differently by different people.
Or we can use language precisely to perhaps more accurately communicate more complex thoughts in ways better calculated to be more clearly understood.
Nah, we had boxes of grid squares.O.K., so, I gots to gets me some of that then!
I don't think the Army ever issued any relative bearing grease that I remember.
Did you Navy guys smoke it, or snort it to get small??
rc