Commercial Air Flight with Gun

Status
Not open for further replies.

TRLaye

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
60
Location
San Jose, Ca
On Sunday, 25 July I flew from Portland, OR to San Jose, CA via Alaska Airlines and since I had a firearm, had to deal with the TSA. A report of that encounter follows.

I arrived at the airport the obligatory 2 or 3 hours early so the bureaucracy would not be unduly disturbed.

My interaction with Alaska Airlines was uneventful and efficient. I attribute that to the fact that the counter check in person I dealt with was a woman who had just come down from Alaska to work in Portland. When I complimented her and said that this was the smoothest check in with a firearm I'd ever had she said that everybody travels with guns in Alaska. I declared that I had a unloaded firearm, she asked me if it was in a locked container within my luggage, which was a Pelican 1510 case, I confirmed it was and she gave me the declaration tag. She didn't wish to see it or handle it. The pistol was inside a locked gun rug. I don't remember her asking about ammo.

Upon completion of the check-n process she directed me to the TSA baggage check point about fifty feet away. She reminded me that I should have the case locks in hand before giving the TSA the case as they wouldn't let me touch the case after the x-ray. I wish all check-ins went that well.

I took the case to the TSA check point, specified I had a declared firearm in the case and that I had the locks with me. They acknowledged that and directed me to the other end of the machine.

About a minute after I reached the other end of the machine the case came out as if it had been launched by a trebuchet and slammed into the end barrier. The TSA gent took the case and then asked if I was the owner and I responded that I was. He asked for the locks to lock the case. Now the problem started.

I explained that the locks were combination locks that had the combo on them so they could be locked. He explained I could not put the locks on the case. He stated it would be a violation of security for me to touch the case after it had been inspected. I commented that giving him the locks would be committing a federal felony as I understood it and I did not wish him to get in trouble for encouraging that. He had apparently heard that before because he immediately called the supervisor over and said he had a problem.

The supervisor, John, came over and made the same comment. I explained what I understood of the situation and issues and he asked where I'd gotten the information and I said off the TSA web site and Federal Code web site and he explained that they were wrong and either he locked the case or the gun didn't fly.

He clearly explained that if I so much as touched the closed and latched case, in front of the TSA security personnel, it would have to go through the machine again. And that then we'd just go through this process again and again until I missed my flight.

Now I am not as fast on my feet as I would like to be and totally missed the opportunity to say okay. The case had already cleared the machine with no inspection of the contents necessary so applying the locks myself and having it go through again would maybe have PO'd the TSA but not bothered me.

But instead I gave him the locks since I was tired, wanted to go home to my Raveness and take the pistol home. The supervisor made a point verbally to ensure that I saw he was putting the locks on the case and not looking at the combo as he rotated the numbers dials to lock the locks. At no time did they open and inspect the case.

I made it onto the flight with time to spare.

Lessons Learned -
Use combination locks that allow you to rotate the combo dials away from your combination and still be able to lock the shackle. I used relatively inexpensive Master locks that had to have the combo dialed in to allow the shackle to close. I purchased them at the last moment, discovered this and did not have time to exchange them. With the proper locks and able to visually determine that my case was locked I would not have been as concerned.

Carry all the printed materials from the TSA, FAR, Federal Codes and airlines regulations with you even if you don't expect to be transporting a firearm. In fact I am placing a Smead self-adhesive vinyl pocket in the lid of the Pelican case to hold these documents and will have a document protector with duplicate documents in my carry on.

The TSA personnel were not unpleasant but obviously did not realize how idiotic it sounded to say that if I physically touched a closed and latched previously inspected case it negated the inspection. To much science fiction maybe?

This is the first time I've flown since Dec 2001 and only did so because I wanted to see my son and wasn't ready to do two days of driving for two days of visiting. Since airline usage is apparently back to pre 9/11 levels and many of you are successfully flying I may fly a little more often as it was really good seeing my son.

It WAS irritating seeing folks being hassled by the needless, like any passenger is going to allow a hijack to succeed, inspections. I was not singled out in spite of the amount of electronic devices with power cords and batteries I had in my carry on. You could see that most folks were irritated and mumbling about having to take belts, jewelry, shoes, etc off but did nothing beyond that. Eavesdropping on conversations around me I found that the inspections were observed and commented upon. There was no rhyme or reason to whom was singled out for additional attention that I could see.

In fact one time a person had their leather jacket in the basket go through the machine and then they were asked questions and delayed while the jacket was gone through by hand with nothing removed or found. I would seem to me that anything that could be found by hand would have been shown by the inspection machine.
 
You posted this 3 days prior to the date of the flight?

Am I missing something here?
 
Nah. Just looked at wrong dates on calendar and then missed when I proofread it.

Try 19 July.

I'd rather go back in time than forward.
 
I had the same problem with that type of lock and the TSA...

I ended up doing the same thing that you did.

My lock is integrated into the case however,.... I'll be getting a new case and a better lock for my next flight.
 
Hi Everyone,

Courtesy of Art Eatman and Jeff OTMG, there is a floating thread in General Gun Discussions regarding the CFRs and TSA FAQ issues discussed here. Check it out....
 
Ya know, I hate to be the stick in the mud about this but I live in Oregon and fly out of PDX a lot. I have gone through the same process many, many times. When they asked for the locks to my case which had been in my presence and under my direct observation throughout I gave them to the TSA guys and they locked it. When it hit the baggage cart I checked to make sure the locks were engaged. No problemo! Yeah, OK I'm comitting and encouraging a felony so if you see me do this feel free to make a citizen's arrest.

Now, I've also flown out of San Jose where the TSA inspection point was out of my view and it was there that I insisted that the only way the Pelican gets unlocked and re-locked is by me or in my presence. After some lengthy discussion with the TSA personnel, their supervisor, SJPD and finally a woman who ID'd herself as the TSA agent in charge they agreed with me. I wasn't carrying the rules but when they showed up with them I pointed the appropriate section out to them.

So here's the thing, just like in law enforcement where I enjoyed a career of more than 25 years, it's the spirit of the law versus the letter of the law. If your case will be out of your direct observation by all means, insist that the TSA personnel follow the letter of the law no matter how long it may take or who else might become involved. But, let's use some common sense here and give the guy the locks if that case has not left your sight, like at PDX. Let's avoid trying to make a federal case out of a molehill 'cause otherwise you just might make it a lot tougher for the next guy who shows up and that could very well be me.

TRLaye: I'd be interested in the account of your experience flying out of San Jose.
 
Number one, I have found air travel with a firearm to be easier than 9/11, if only because everyone now appears to know the rules.

I have had no problem flying, but wonder why folks use combination locks. Each time I have flown I have locked my gun case, as well as the suitcase in which it goes, and have stood by with the key while TSA runs it through the machine. Each and everytime they have given me the go ahead, and have not had to unlock my bag.
 
Flying out of Pensacola and San Antonio they both asked for the case to be unlocked for inspection. I use two heavy keyed pad locks on my pelican rifle case. When the time came to relock the case I handed them the two opened locks, and watched them relock the case. I had the key the entire time, so I think I was in compliance with the rules by the letter and spirit.

One TSA guy commented on the Wilson Combat guns and said he liked the .45 as he was a gun owner too. Boy you should have seen the look this older females face when the case was fully opened on the floor of the airport to place the signed forms in! She was looking at two AR15s and two 1911s. My friend opened the case all the way just to get her goat. It worked.

I had problems with TSA but it had nothing to do with the firearms. Everyone seemed to know what was going on, and in San Antonio they held the case for me to pick up, which I greatly appreciated.

Seems the lesson is avoid combination locks altogether.

One other thing, I was escorted by TSA from check in to the security check area and he (tsa dude) stayed with me the whole time until the process was completed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top