Superlite27 said:
I think it's time we stop categorizing people by their beliefs and start looking for the truth as individuals. We need to stop believing things because that's what a good conservative, or a good liberal is supposed to believe.
Truth. And said far better than my terrible attempt above.
Superlite27 said:
I congratulate you on your arrival at an independant conclusion: Firearms are inanimate objects and have no inherant characteristics. They are things that, although dangerous, may be used by a person to do good or evil.
I'd like to point out that for a lot of anti-gun people, it's the fact that guns
are dangerous that they focus on. The fear comes from the fact that a
lot of people - even people with significant experience with guns - don't know how to properly handle firearms. If you don't know anything about how to
safely handle a gun, and you see - personally or in news stories - where people who
should know what they are doing have negligent discharges... the conclusion most people would come to is obvious.
My brother-in-law, for example, has been around guns his entire life and doesn't seem to know enough to keep his trigger finger off the gun until he has a sight picture and is ready to shoot. In other words, his booger hook is on the bang switch constantly. He's a negligent discharge waiting to happen. Until recently - when I took a basic pistol class and acquired my own pistol - I haven't felt like I had the authority to chastise him about it even tho I knew better... I didn't even know how to operate a handgun other than "pull trigger go boom". I couldn't make a gun handed to me safe.
The secret is education, not acrimony. The more people know, the less afraid they will be of an admittedly dangerous item.
sacp81170a said:
Collectivists (I prefer that term rather than Liberal. Liberal has an older, more respectable meaning) live in a state of denial that they can be harmed until faced with the actual possibility.
I meant to address this earlier, but I'm watching the Rose Bowl on the old PVR, and got distracted. This is most definitely untrue - you are confusing "false invincibility" (like what teenagers have) with not being afraid of a statistical improbability. The fact of the matter is that if you practice good OpSec and don't run with a bad crowd, the odds of being a victim in a violent crime are quite low. The overwhelming majority of murders are by people known by the victim. Only 14% of all homicides involve strangers. Your odds of dying this year in a "random" violent crime are roughly 150000 to 1. Your odds of dying in a transportation accident are 77 to 1. I bet if you avoid risky behavior, those odds get a lot longer.
Of course, that doesn't talk to any possible deterrent effect a largely armed populace might have. Making armed robbery more dangerous might have an effect on reducing it, but AFAIK we don't have any statistics on that - just a lot of platitudes.
So while I have my CCL, I don't know that I'll actually carry all that much - and not just because it's a felony to carry to work. The argument that it'd
really suck to need it and not have it is pretty compelling, tho. I do believe in being prepared for emergencies.