CAS700850
Member
One of the bailiffs I work with is a retired Columbus (Ohio) detective. He ust qualified with Columbus P.D. as a retired officer, so he can now qualify under federal law to carry anywhere in the U.S. He was telling me about the course, and two points really confused me. First, he shot his 4 inch Smith 66, and said that he is now considered qualified on all revolvers. If he had instead borrowed an auto from me and qualified with it, he would be considered qualified to carry either an auto or a revolver. Can anyone explain this logic? There must be some thought process to this, as my grandfather in Florida told me that when he got his CCW permit, he shot with his 1911 so he could carry any revolver or auto, and that if he had used his 686, he would be authorized to carry only revolvers.
Second, Jim (the bailiff) said that all stages started with 5 shots in the gun, whether it was auto or revolver. Why?
Any help would be appreciated, because I'm trying to assist in developing a training curriculum for bailiffs in our court, including handgun training, and am seriously interested in any logic behind these points.
Second, Jim (the bailiff) said that all stages started with 5 shots in the gun, whether it was auto or revolver. Why?
Any help would be appreciated, because I'm trying to assist in developing a training curriculum for bailiffs in our court, including handgun training, and am seriously interested in any logic behind these points.