No experience with the CZ, but understand they are very respectable rifles.
Own two of those ugly Savage rifles
and couldn't be happier with them. In fact, am contemplating trading a cantankerous mod. 70 300 Win Mag. off for another Savage, and I have been a Mod. 70 fan for more years than I care to admit.
My first Savage was a mod. 112 in 338 Win Mag, pre accutrigger. The prior owner had worked on the trigger and it is as good as any of my Mod. 70's. Shoots 5/8" groups @ 100 yds any day I do my part w/225 gr. accubonds. (Beats heck out of the 1.5 moa groups I get from the above mentioned 300 WM and that only after MUCH "tweaking".)
My latest is a Mod. 10FP in 223 Rem. and the accutriger came set at 1.5# from factory and shoots sub moa, out of the box, with
anything I have put through it so far. Just started playing w/handloads and so far have not improved on WW 53 gr. hp factory loads, but am sure I can with a little more time.
Both my rifles have that "pitiful" plastic stock and, while I have to agree that they are not much to look at, all I can say is pretty is as pretty does. In fact, I rather like the homely stocks as I can enjoy using them and not worry about a ding or four. My rifles are tools that are used 8 months out of the year, not show guns and accuracy/dependability are paramount to me.
Doubt that you would go wrong with either the CZ or the Savage, depends on what you are looking for in a rifle.
Regards,
hps