Dangerous prank calls draw SWAT teams

Status
Not open for further replies.

erik the bold

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2004
Messages
324
Location
Middle of the Mitten, Somewhere' Nort of Hell
Possibly another reason to get rid of SWAT teams...

From: http://www.khou.com/topstories/stories/khou071223_tnt_swating.44853527.html

Dangerous prank calls draw SWAT teams to unsuspecting homes


By JASON TRAHAN / The Dallas Morning News

As SWAT officers surrounded an Alvarado home in rural Johnson County, they steeled themselves for a confrontation with what they believed to be a drug-crazed man armed with an AK-47 who had already killed his wife, taken hostages and wanted to kill police.

But what they found was an innocent 60-year-old trucker. No bloody crime scene, no assault rifle – only unanswered questions.

Authorities soon realized they had encountered a disturbing and dangerous new prank that has been labeled "SWATing."

Four men and a woman have pleaded guilty in Dallas federal court to charges that they used "spoofing" technology and other phone system intrusion methods to alter their caller ID information. Over a period stretching from 2002 to late 2006, they called police in Johnson County and more than 60 cities around the country, pretending to be inside someone's home, saying they had killed people, had taken hostages and were ready to kill more.

The aim of SWATing is to spin a tale grisly enough to get tactical teams deployed to unsuspecting victims' homes.

A few innocent victims have been injured during the SWAT raids: A Florida grandfather was hurt in a fistfight he got into with police who he initially believed were the pranksters, and others have been injured as police busted down doors.

The potential for even more violence is high, said Cpl. Dale Abbott, leader of Cleburne's SWAT team, which responded to the call to the home of Jim Proulx, the Alvarado man who was SWATed last year.

"Say he had heard a noise outside, and say he came out with a gun. It could have turned out really bad," Cpl. Abbott said.

"These individuals are doing it for bragging rights and ego, vs. any monetary gain," said Kevin Kolbye, assistant special agent in charge of the Dallas FBI office, which has taken the lead nationally investigating this new crime.

"What they don't realize is that they are causing a significant amount of scarce police resources to be spent, and putting individuals in situations that are safety concerns," he said.

The defendants include Stuart Rosoff, a.k.a. Michael Knight, of Ohio; Jason Trowbridge, a.k.a. "Mr. Stoner," and his girlfriend, Angela Roberson, both from Houston; Chad Ward, a.k.a. "Dark Angel," of New York; and Guadalupe Santana Martinez, a.k.a. "Wicked Wizard," who has lived in Washington and Oregon.

Prosecutors described Mr. Rosoff as the leader of the group, but his attorney said he was easily influenced by others.

"He's very sorry for what he's done," said Victor Vital, the attorney. "He's not offering any excuses. In pleading guilty, he acknowledges any harm he's caused anybody and he realizes he has to change his life. The first step is to help the government prosecute other perpetrators, and that's what he's doing."

Ms. Roberson's attorney says she regrets her involvement with the other defendants and accepts responsibility for her actions. Attorneys for the other defendants either had no comment or could not be reached.

The defendants are scheduled to be sentenced early next year. Each faces up to five years in prison, a $250,000 fine and restitution costs.

Mr. Proulx said he was targeted because his daughter in Fort Worth had a disagreement with some of the defendants on a telephone party line chat line, a social networking service.

Authorities say that for months, the defendants called and harassed Mr. Proulx, his wife and daughter. At times, callers posed as a police officer, prodding Mr. Proulx before the real SWAT team's arrival.

"These goofballs, when they were calling us, they were threatening us, urging me to come out with a gun," Mr. Proulx said. "They wanted me to get blown away."

The Dallas FBI says that in addition to Johnson County, the group has attempted to get SWAT teams called out in Fort Worth, Dallas, Highland Park, Garland and Mesquite. In Texas, calls have been reported in Victoria, Houston, Tyler and Lubbock.

Incidents are also being investigated in California, Florida, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Arkansas, Washington, Oregon, Ohio, New Jersey, Alabama and Michigan.

The defendants encountered most of their approximately 150 victims through telephone chat services, authorities said. The party lines work much the same way as Internet chat rooms, where someone can talk to several people at once, or meet people to converse with individually.

The chat lines have their own subculture, where not only friendships blossom, but also rivalries.

"There is a sense among these people on these party lines that if someone does something to you, you do something back to them," said Mr. Vital, Mr. Rosoff's attorney.

"There is this code of ethics on the line that you don't cross over certain boundaries," he said. "If you did, you'd get tow trucks showing up at hour house, or 20 pizzas that you didn't order."

"Some of these people were spiteful and vindictive and 'launched' on people for no reason," he said.

Up to 20 people were involved in the SWATing incidents related to the Dallas case, and more charges could follow. Some people are cooperating with authorities.

Most of those people engaged in SWATing are considered "phreakers," or people who exploit the telephone system for fun or money.

Some defendants posed as telephone employees to gain information about their intended targets, as well as to harass people by having their phone service turned off, authorities said.

The spoof cards used by the defendants to alter their caller ID information are legal and work like a calling card. The cards, sold at www.spoofcard.com, can also be used to disguise one's voice on the telephone.

They are often used by debt collectors to fool their targets into picking up the phone, or by investigators to hide their identities to gather information. Scammers use them as well, sometimes posing as police or other authorities and extort money from victims.

According to court documents, Mr. Rosoff worked with a blind teenage computer whiz, known as the "little hacker," from Revere, Mass., near Boston, to fool telephone employees into giving them information on their victims and to manipulate phone service.

The FBI also says Mr. Rosoff targeted a Michigan woman, demanding phone sex from her. When she declined, he had her phone service terminated, and then called in false allegations of child abuse to authorities in her area, hoping to have her arrested, documents state.

Mr. Martinez's role in the scheme was to make the bogus calls to police, and he posed as Mr. Proulx, among others, authorities say.

Mr. Ward, who owns a chat line business as well as a tattoo parlor in New York, paid to have certain people targeted, according to the FBI.

Prosecutors allege that Mr. Trowbridge, a debt collector, used commercial credit databases to which he had access to dig up information on the SWATing victims.

According to the FBI, his spoof card was used to call a Grand Prairie family who owed a debt, masking his caller ID to make it seem as if the calls were coming from the Dallas County Sheriff's Department.

The account was also used to make people believe they were getting calls from Dallas code compliance officers and the Dallas police narcotics division.

Ms. Roberson was Mr. Trowbridge's girlfriend, and admitted using the commercial database Accurint to assist in illegally pulling up information on victims.

"Not a day goes by that my client doesn't regret that she ever got involved with these guys," said Eric Davis, Ms. Roberson's attorney. "She's trying to move forward with her life. She's taking responsibility for her part in this."


Not High Road, but this bunch, IMHO, should be strung up...
 
This is what happens when you let just anybody have a telephone.

You can walk into a store and buy a phone without even a background check. Only LEOs, military, and govt offices need telephones.

The Founding Fathers never envisioned telephones when they wrote the First Amendment.
 
rofl @ TallPine's comment :D

I feel really bad that innocent civilians were injured when the SWAT teams showed up to their house.
 
I'm sorry, these SWAT/Gestapo teams have no business being in America. Nobody is holding them accountable for their "collateral damage".

--wally.
 
+1 for what wally said. Heavily armed police units operate with near impunity and are used far, FAR too often. I think situations like these could be averted by more active police work: instead of sending in the SWAT unit right away, there should be experienced police officers on the scene to assess the situation to figure out if heavy use of force is necessary.

Also, on a somewhat different subject, imagine the following situation:

hAx0rboy15 is pulling this kind of prank of Joe blow who happens to be a shooter and is generally self aware about self defense issues. SWAT teams makes an entry, scares Joe Blow who gets his shotgun/pistol, shoots and kills a police officer, and is then either wounded or killed by another cop.

All around this is a tragic situation, but would the idiot making the prank be liable for murder? I know these events are rare (thankfully) but with police agencies getting more and more lee-way to engage in heavy-handedness the potential for disaster keeps on rising.
 
It appears that no one is considering the effect that hackers have on society. All of the above respondents, the phone company and the police have no idea what to do with these hackers.

When you devise a complex system like this (phone system) which you rely upon to make life or death decisions, it needs to be secure. That means the system designers need to make it impossible or difficult to compromise/hijack by trouble makers. If it is hacked/compromised, there need to be redundant logs at multiple locations which record events and facilitate 'forensics' after the event.

It is obvious that the system engineers never even considered that this could happen. These punks who are exploiting loopholes are able to perpetrate their crimes unimpeded since there were no road blocks put in their way.

I design software for a multi-national electronics manufacturer. You would not believe how many other software designers or systems engineers never consider the "what if" questions. These are the eventualities which are dooms-day scenarios for your systems, where everything gets hacked and compromised. For example, how should we safeguard against all our customers' or employees' sensitive data being stolen, or how should we prevent the system from being misused? You would not believe how many meetings I leave where I've had to bring this up and send everyone back to the drawing board because their plans were so wide open to attack from hackers and miscreants.
 
"Great another "lets slam the police" thread, Ok so when a body armored maniac (like north Hollywood) starts up how do you propose to stop him?"

Well seein as the police had to go to a gun store, one of the two took his own life, the other was taken out by regular officers.

SWAT does have a time and place but confirmation is needed. People whether LEO or the public need to be held accountable for their actions. If I get a phone call from the neighbors and bust in their house causing damage or injury, I am held accountable.

One of the things I miss the most is "Checks and Balances" Who checks the checkers?
 
I guess if I recieved a call like that, I would call the number back. How hard is that?:banghead:
 
so when a body armored maniac (like north Hollywood) starts up how do you propose to stop him?
With a head shot.

So when said individual kicks in your door yelling "PO-LEECE!" you'll just think to yourself that it's a simple police misunderstanding, you'll just comply and work it out in court later. Good luck with that.

This stuff is scary all around. Not just the police, but the fact that the system is so easily "spoofed." It's that whole "spoofing" part that really scares the crap out of me.
 
It still seems to me that folks are focusing on the SWAT element in this situation. You should focus on the instigators and how to prevent the initial action that caused the whole business in the first place.
 
Wow stirred the nest up I'll break it down,

The last guy was killed by SWAT,

There are glitches in the system but it cost money to fix them,

If cops are doing as much training as others THR's say (not much training) how are they going to make headshots?

Oh yeah what about hostage situations/rescues?

Yeah SWAT is responsible but what happened to actually going after the main criminal.......the hacker
 
I'm sorry, these SWAT/Gestapo teams have no business being in America. Nobody is holding them accountable for their "collateral damage".

--wally.

I disagree. Being a LEO myself, I think the fear of civil accountability is largely responsible for many "over-the-top" LE actions. In the case the original poser brought up, for example, how could the police not respond if they are called and told an active shooter was on the loose? If they don't and it's real the civil liability is enormous. As LEOs, we simply do not have the freedom to think "that doesn't sound plausible, we aren't going to respond". I have to say most of the "man with gun / knife" calls I've been dispatched to have been received with a disbelieving eye-roll on my part. But I can't afford not to go. I don't have pockets that deep.

From another standpoint, how do the anti-LEOs on this board propose that the police respond to a reported active shooter? Send one officer to go knock on the door, being sure to bring cookies so he doesn't offend anybody if it's a false alarm?

+1 for what wally said. Heavily armed police units operate with near impunity and are used far, FAR too often

Oh jeez, how do you know??? The mass media? When it comes to portraying guns or republicans the mass media "never gets it right" but when they report on an unfortunate LEO event it's "thar's those damn jack-boots again!! Thank goodness for the free media!!!"

Would you look at yourselves? Many of you have the same over-the-top, emotional, uninformed, stereotying attitude about the police that anti-gunners have about YOU

Everybody on the internet knows how to be a cop. Let the bashing continue...
 
Sergeant Sabre said:
From another standpoint, how do the anti-LEOs on this board propose that the police respond to a reported active shooter? Send one officer to go knock on the door, being sure to bring cookies so he doesn't offend anybody if it's a false alarm?

Not to sound overly snarky, but wouldn't an "active shooter" cause gunshots to be heard? This may be like Sherlock Holmes' case of the dog that didn't bark but if I was responding to such a call, I'd expect to hear gunshots.
NOT hearing gunshots would be suspicious. Maybe not enough to make me drive off (maybe the actor is reloading) but, still????

Anyway, one thing seems certain, whatever policemen do, most people will never thank them for it .....:uhoh::eek:
 
Close the Telephone Loophole

Abuses like these are clear evidence that we need to close the Telephone Loophole.

As things stand now, anyone can buy telephone service from unscrupulous providers who care only about money. They do not consult the NICS database, check backgrounds, require the completion of a Form 4473 or its equivalent, and will provide telephone service to anyone who pays.

Even lunatics, felons, and underage people can get dangerous telephones that can be used in deadly assaults on innocent people. The crime problems in cities such as New York City, Boston, Washington, D.C., and Chicago are increased by these illegal telephones. They have caused problems in California, Florida, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Arkansas, Washington, Oregon, Ohio, New Jersey, Alabama and Michigan.

I call on Rep. Carolyn McCarthy to introduce The Assault Telephone Ban of 2008 and I demand that the Congress introduce The Telephone Loophole Closing Act of 2008. They must be done now to protect us from dangerous telephones in the hands of dangerous people. Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York City and Supreme Ruler of the Universe needs to send his task forces out into the country to search and destroy the telephone providers who enable these criminals.

When Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama take office as President of the United States they will stamp out the illegal telephone menace.

In the meantime we as citizens must act immediately to have our state legislators establish our schools, colleges, bars, and all other public places as Telephone Free Zones. If you see anyone in public using a telephone, call 911 to report that person to the police.
 
The SWAT people are a bit at blame as well, though... You don't take a random caller's word for it and storm a house with guns blazing. Recon, maybe? Look through the windows? Call the home number and ask to speak to the hostage taker? Anything?
 
I'm sorry, these SWAT/Gestapo teams have no business being in America. Nobody is holding them accountable for their "collateral damage".

BOVINE SCATOLOGY!!!

Yeah, some bonehead police management types use them waaay too much, but there is a need for them.

Blaming the cops for a hacker's violation of one's civil rights is the argument of an idiot. I guess the next time there's a 911 call of an active shooter we should simply send a Social worker.
 
on a telephone party line chat line, a social networking service
I thought these went out in the 50's?

Seems to me the bad guys are the ones making the prank calls, not the cops. If your tricking the 911 system into believing the call originates from a particular address, how do you varify?

Knock politly on the door and ask is everything okay when in reality a gunman could have everyone tied up in another room?

How bout putting the blame where its due for a change.

Maybe a new years resolution for some.
 
Not to sound overly snarky, but wouldn't an "active shooter" cause gunshots to be heard? This may be like Sherlock Holmes' case of the dog that didn't bark but if I was responding to such a call, I'd expect to hear gunshots.
NOT hearing gunshots would be suspicious. Maybe not enough to make me drive off (maybe the actor is reloading) but, still????

Not snarky at all.

I understand what you are saying. One can not assume, though. The last officer killed in my area didn't hear any shots at all. Probably not even the one that killed him as he was attempting to move to a position at the rear of a residence and was ambushed.

Would you stake your life on the fact that you haven't heard any shooting yet?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top