I do this all the time, it is my choice, and my money.
How many of you will pass on something like a S&W 642 because it has the politically correct key lock safety located just under the cylinder release?
I will be in the market for such a gun as a S&W 642, in excellent condition, and I will pay a premium because that is what I am looking for. But if it has an intrical safety lock of some sort, I will not even consider it unless it is at least $100 less than it should be.
How many others out there feel the same way as I do,,,,,,,,,,or tell me where I am completely wrong on these factory safety devices.
I would like to note that the Springfield Armory 1911 mainspring housing lock doesn’t offend me as much, I can fix politically correct safety device like that very easily with similar or original JMB style parts.
It is something that I just think is offensive to the original design of the weapon.
How many of you will pass on something like a S&W 642 because it has the politically correct key lock safety located just under the cylinder release?
I will be in the market for such a gun as a S&W 642, in excellent condition, and I will pay a premium because that is what I am looking for. But if it has an intrical safety lock of some sort, I will not even consider it unless it is at least $100 less than it should be.
How many others out there feel the same way as I do,,,,,,,,,,or tell me where I am completely wrong on these factory safety devices.
I would like to note that the Springfield Armory 1911 mainspring housing lock doesn’t offend me as much, I can fix politically correct safety device like that very easily with similar or original JMB style parts.
It is something that I just think is offensive to the original design of the weapon.