Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

EOTech vs. Bushnell Holo Sight

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by 45shooter, Oct 16, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 45shooter

    45shooter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2004
    Messages:
    262
    Location:
    USA
    I would like to get a "holographic" sight to try on one of my AR-15 carbines and have narrowed my choice to EO Tech and Bushnell. Looking at these two sights they look very similar except for the "guard (shield?)" surrounding the unit on the EO Tech while the Bushnell unit does not. Also, the price difference is only about $30 - $40 between these two makers.

    Are Eo Tech and Bushnell holographic sights manufactured by same factory and are they made to same specification? Is EO Tech any better than Bushnell to justify higher cost? Finally, is the "guard(shield)" on the EO Tech a worthwhile feature... does it really offer additional protection?
     
  2. hksw

    hksw Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,157
    Location:
    OH
    EOTech private labels the rollbar-less holo sight for Bushnell. From the Bushnell I've seen, it seemed identical to the 511 I have IIRC, minus the rollbar of course.

    Although I keep relatively good care of my rifles, I do like the added protection (at least the thought of it) in the remote event that I drop the rifle (AR) top side down. I use it mainly for plate shoots. If you use or think you'll use the rifle in a rough manner, I'd go with the rollhoop. Plus it looks a little cooler with it.
     
  3. Tamara

    Tamara Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    9,325
    Location:
    Hoosieropolis
    The EOTech is, basically, a ruggedized HoloSight. There are further detail differences on some models, but that's the case in a nutshell...
     
  4. SunBear

    SunBear member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2003
    Messages:
    288
    Location:
    TN
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page