Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

FAL or M1A?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by AJBarney, Oct 9, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. AJBarney

    AJBarney Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29
    Looking for a fullpower cartridge semi-auto rifle. Which of these would you prefer and why?

    CETMEs any good?
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2012
  2. ugaarguy

    ugaarguy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    12,042
    The CETME is not a version of the FAL. The CETME is the the rifle the HK91 / G3 was based upon.

    Of the two you list I'd rather have the FAL for ease of maintenance. Leaving that list I'd rather have an AR-10 or SR-25 based rifle for far better accuracy, much easier mounting of optics, greater modularity, and even easier maintenance.
     
  3. creeper1956

    creeper1956 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2012
    Messages:
    247
    Location:
    Washington State
    Oh man... this is one of them "never to be settled" kinda questions. Just to be a wanker, I prefer the Sig PE57/AMT. :D

    CETME FAL? There's no such animal. The CETME is the father of the H&K G3.

    C
     
  4. AJBarney

    AJBarney Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    29
    oh, sorry about my mixup there. never mind that question :D
     
  5. Narwhal

    Narwhal Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2010
    Messages:
    240
  6. jonnyc

    jonnyc Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    2,361
    Location:
    SE Pennsylvania
    My friend has both and I shoot them fairly often. The M1A is MUCH more accurate and fun to shoot, and the one I would buy.
     
  7. Kyle M.

    Kyle M. Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2012
    Messages:
    323
    Location:
    Bucyrus Ohio
    I've owned both and if doing it over I'd go with the M1A.
     
  8. siglite

    siglite Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,234
    Location:
    Charleston, WV
    .45 or 9mm?

    :D

    I prefer the M1A out of those two. But that's my preference. The market is trending towards AR pattern 308s and with reason. The OBR is a monster, as is the SR25. And my friend built his own 308 AR, and it shoots just as tight and just as reliably as our mutual friend's OBR.

    If I were looking PURELY on objective criteria, I would go the AR route. But shooting is not purely objective. And I bought myself a really nice M14, because something about it speaks to me. It was one of those situations where I dropped to the sitting position, hooked up the sling, threw it in my shoulder, and it felt like someone, somewhere, designed and built that rifle for me and me alone.

    So when the time came, I went about as high end as one could go on custom-tuned builds. I am very, very happy with my decision.

    Now, given my explanation above, you can see my bias. You might have the same experience with a FAL or CETME.
     
  9. briansmithwins

    briansmithwins Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    Messages:
    4,091
    To throw another one into the mix: SCAR 17S.

    You get a modern design that's ambidextrous, rugged, designed for optics, lightweight, and dirt resistant.

    Of course, you will pay for these features.

    BSW
     
  10. checkmyswag

    checkmyswag Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2011
    Messages:
    364
    Location:
    Texas
    I think you'll find few who prefer the FAL. But those who do...really prefer them.
     
  11. 61chalk

    61chalk Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Messages:
    918
    Location:
    Indiana
    M1A all the way.
     
  12. az_imuth

    az_imuth Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2007
    Messages:
    585
    Location:
    Estado de Lone Star
  13. Gtimothy

    Gtimothy Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    417
    Location:
    South West Florida
    I bought a FAL and want an M1A...does that count???

    Here's mine:
    P1010009.gif
     
    Last edited: Oct 10, 2012
  14. fireside44

    fireside44 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    746
    No real experience with the M1A but I built a FAL and have zero desire for an M1A. It's nothing to go 1,000 rounds or more without cleaning and zero worries, very reliable, best most fully tunable gas system ever produced, and available in a folding stock version to boot. No pistol grip or folding stock without mega bucks in the M1A. I can imagine I would be happy with an M1A though had I gone that route, they seem to be a great rifle too. The FAL was just a bit cheaper for me to acquire.
     
  15. GMHAYESUSN

    GMHAYESUSN Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2010
    Messages:
    111
    Location:
    Washington State
    M1A! We have original M-14s on my boat and they are a BLAST to shoot and in the right hands more capable than the m16 in my opinion. The FA capability was taken away a few months after i arrived to the boat but not before i had some fun. Something about this gun is just addicting to me.
     
  16. JSNAPS

    JSNAPS Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2011
    Messages:
    133
    If you are not budget limited and want the penultimate .308 battle rifle get a 17s.
     
  17. ZekeLuvs1911s

    ZekeLuvs1911s Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    3
    Location:
    NJ, USA
    Get both! I got both and the M1A is prettier. :D However, you can't go wrong with a FAL either.
     
  18. fireside44

    fireside44 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    746
    I'll consider that the ultimate battle rifle when 90 nations adopt it.
     
  19. Slamfire

    Slamfire Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    7,649
    Location:
    Alabama
    While I think the FAL is an outstanding battle rifle, I prefer the M1a.

    Better sights, in the match version, outstanding accuracy, I like the open top design and having the ability to positively close the bolt. My M1a triggers are outstanding, I have never felt a stock box FAL trigger as good.

    The basic problem in comparing is that the advantageous features found in one are not duplicated in the other. So it really is, do you like chocolate or vanilla for your ice cream?, because you can’t have both.

    So when it comes to that choice, I will take the M1a.
     
  20. Adam123

    Adam123 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    441
    Location:
    PA
  21. lmccrock

    lmccrock Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    340
    Location:
    Red Rock, TX
    For a scope and better ergonomics: FAL

    For iron sights and better trigger: M1A

    For the best of both, a 308 AR variant. Scope or irons, good ergonomics, great trigger.

    I own M1 rifle (like a long internal mag M1A), STG-58 (Austrian FAL), and LR-308 (308 AR). I grab the LR-308 most of the time.
     
  22. rduckwor

    rduckwor Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    Messages:
    428
    FAL. Energizer bunny of battle rifles.

    RMD
     
  23. Trung Si

    Trung Si Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2009
    Messages:
    169
    Location:
    Texas
    I love the 14s, they are accurate beyond believe and a Blast to shoot, I own three of them, but if I had to use a Rifle for Combat, my choice would be an FAL, btw I own one of those!;)
     
  24. barnbwt

    barnbwt Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2011
    Messages:
    7,056
    You mean an FN 49 in 30-06? ;)
    P7150032small.gif

    I'd say that BM-59 posted earlier (box-fed Garand) is a close runner-up (if you can find one under 3000$). There's a variant of the FN 49 that also has a 20-round box-mag in .308. My FN will be getting some more attention once I stock up on some .30 after the election craziness, it's been functional so far, though :)

    Check out the FNAR or any of the BAR series as well; near-bolt action accuracy, for a good deal less coin than a 308 AR or even nice M1A rifle.

    TCB
     
  25. Robert

    Robert Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    10,277
    Location:
    Texan by birth, in Colorado cause I hate humidity
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page