Fighting gun?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The wound channel of the projectile should figure into the analysis. Elmer Kieth reckoned the lead round ball to be then best killer of man or beast for a reason. Round lead balls make wicked wound channels.

I've seen this claim of Keith's before. My personal experience doesn't bear it out. I've killed deer with .45 and .50 caliber flintlocks using round lead balls. I've seen a bunch more killed by others using .55 round balls. The wounds were nothing spectacular. Typically, there was less tissue destruction than on deer shot with centerfire rifles.
Can anybody link to post-mortem photos or gel photos that back up Elmer's claims?
 
Page 4 of the linked thread mentions 3 cases of a people being shot with a C&B revolver.
In each case the victim died.
No one should need to be convinced that C&B's are lethal working guns. :cool:

Stopping power of BP vs. Modern Cartridges

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=570456&page=4&highlight=murder

This excerpt from the 2nd case was posted by Erich who worked on the murder case:

Erich said:
....Dr. Stephens conducted the autopsy on the victim on September 12, 2001. She determined that the victim had been shot two times, once in the chest and once in the abdomen. The victim died as a result of these gun shot wounds. The first wound examined, wound A, was found in the right side back of the chest, and followed a bullet path ending in the left side of the body. Dr. Stephens described the path of the bullet in detail, indicating all bones and internal organs struck by the bullet. In her opinion, the victim's chances of surviving wound A were less then fifty percent even had the victim been in the emergency room and subject to immediate emergency care.

Wound B indicated that the bullet entered the body in the middle of the upper torso, a little to the right of the midline of the body, and lodged against the back body. Again, Dr. Stephens described the path of the bullet and the resulting damage to the internal organs. She said that wound B would also have been fatal “without immediate excellent medical care.” Each of the wounds could have been fatal by itself. The victim did not die immediately from the wounds. He was resuscitated and kept alive on the way to the emergency room, but he was beyond resuscitation by the time he arrived there....
 
Last edited:
I should have stated that the BP revolvers were concieved as fighting guns, not to make it look like I was questioning using one in a gunfight.
Nevertheless, many, many, good points have been brought up and the question of the worthiness of a Cap nd Ball revolver as a fighting tool have been answered.
YES it is a good fighter!
The preformance of the round ball against flesh is a proven point throughout the Civil War and since. The Ball works.
Fact is the Percussion revolver is as deadly today as it ever was and is likely made better and of better materials.
ZVP
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top