Fastcast
Member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2008
- Messages
- 874
I gotta ask. Folks are expressing concern about safety and Glocks. A couple facts. Firstly, no firearm has even approached Glock in numbers issued to police forces. More cops carry Glocks than anything else. This has been the case since the revolver days. This is a fact. Secondly, no one cares about liability more than police departments. Along these same lines is the fact that police administrators care more about liability than any other people. Citys and countys and states and agencies, who issue these Glocks, care more about liability than anyone else. If these guns were not safe, if they weren't defensible in courtrooms, if training programs were not consistant with recruits of ALL KINDS OF FIREARMS BACKGROUNDS, they would not be issued in the numbers they are.
Please don't dwell on the safety issue as it applies to Glock pistols. It is a non issue.
If they don't fit or you don't like them, fine. But let's not make up stuff.
Making up what?.....That Glocks or their operators seem to have a higher inherent risk of accidentally or negligently discharging their sidearm? There's nothing made up about that!
Many of LEO's have Glock leg also.....Sure you can say, because Glocks are very reliable they were awarded the majority of police contracts but many other sidearms are also very reliable and safer. The Glock is used in most police departments based on low bid contracts. Like most other large business contracts, politics are also involved.
It's also getting old hearing about the very difficult task of disengaging a manual safety ......Please, if this is such a difficult task for some individuals, maybe they would be best to stick with revolvers or pepper spray. If one can't be trained to swipe a manual safety on the draw, are they the type of individual who should be trusted to the life and death decisions that are required of LEO's?