For those who ever debated with an Anti you might enjoy this

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dbl0Kevin

Member
Joined
May 26, 2004
Messages
1,183
Location
SC
This happend about 2-3 years ago and I always send it to fellow gun people when they need a laugh. My friend Jeff and I decided to mark up a conversation with an old friend of mine over gun control. My favorite parts are the ones in blue. :D



Lisa: The Anti-Logic

The Story:
This is the story of our friend Lisa who entered into a discussion with Kevin about firearms. We felt after suffering through the horror of this discussion we needed to share it with the world. In this debate Lisa exemplifies the typical “liberal idiotâ€. Warning: while reading this your brain may want to chew its way out the back of your head. Be careful…….and with that read on……

Key:
Green: Anti-Logic
Orange: Complete Nonsense
Blue: Contradictory Statements
Red: Our Comments

Note: Spelling and grammatical errors have been fixed for ease of reading.

Kevin: I'm trying my damndest to fix this paintball gun but no dice yet
Lisa: ahhhhhhhh
Lisa: I don't understand the point
Kevin: what do you mean?
Lisa: in a paint ball gun
Lisa: I don't get it
Kevin: ummmm to play paintball
Lisa: ok I guess (Guess??)
Kevin: what's there to guess?
Lisa: and what do you need a rifle for?
Kevin: what do you need anything for?
Lisa: omg you didn't say that
Kevin: omg yes I did
Lisa: forget it...I’m not going there
Kevin: going where???
Lisa: Dick used to say that all the time...and it would piss me off something fierce
Lisa: it's stupid to say (Why is it stupid to say?)
Kevin: no it's not.....think about it....what do you really NEED?
Kevin: food, water, air
Kevin: that's it
Kevin: everything else is just personal preference
Lisa: you really don't need those things either (ummm if my biology is correct…yes you do)...think about that...you're just going to die...everyone might as well just kill themselves and get it over with (wow perfect logic….you first, we’re right behind ya)
Kevin: well that's pretty grim
Lisa: well so was your statement (no it wasn’t, he spoke the truth)
Kevin: ummm no.....the only things you need to survive are food water and air....how can you disagree with that?
Lisa: I just think your statement was stupid (but he was right!!!)...I'm sorry you take things so f**kin literal (How else can you take that?)...maybe I should say...what do you WANT a rifle for?
Kevin: jeez no need to go off the handle.....sorry if I hit a nerve
Lisa: I’m sorry I just hate it when people say stupid ???? like that
Kevin: well it bothers me when people ask me why I need a rifle......just cause they don't see the point in it they assume no one else does
Lisa: well then ????in answer the question...I didn't ASSUME anything...I innocently asked. What do you need a rifle for? (Yeah….real innocent) you have no idea what my opinion about guns is. (I think I can take a guess….using what….LOGIC)
Kevin: ok.....
Kevin: 1. for target shooting
Kevin: 2. for self-defense
Kevin: 3. I collect them
Kevin: 4. I find them interesting
Kevin: how's that?
Lisa: wonderful
Kevin: and I didn't mean YOU assumed that I was talking about people in general
Lisa: well you were talking to me. Not people in general
Kevin: Kevin: well it bothers me when "people" ask
Kevin: not you
Lisa: well obviously it bothered you that I asked or I wouldn't have gotten the answer I got
Kevin: I’m sorry I’m just a bit edgy with that....you have no idea how many arguments I’ve gotten in because people don't know what they're talking about and think they do
Kevin: so I apologize
Lisa: I accept...but I guess you should know...I don't like guns...and I was very happy that we didn't go to that beef and beer thing last weekend. Seems it was at a gun club
Kevin: yes I told you that
Lisa: Hmm...I don't remember you telling me that...Billy got home and was telling me about some game they were playing shooting stuff...and I was sooooo glad I didn't go. I would have wanted to leave as soon as we got there.
Kevin: ok.....why don't you like guns?
Lisa: ok...I have no idea what the laws are...or the rules...or the technical ????...but... (Well that’s apparent)
Kevin: well I just want to know why YOU don't like guns
Lisa: don't get a f**kin attitude kev...chill (How can she tell attitude over a computer?)
Kevin: I’m not
Lisa: riiiiiiiight
Lisa: but anyway
Kevin: look I’m just trying to have a discussion
Lisa: they are dangerous...and there is no reason to play games with guns and risk an injury to anyone.
Kevin: no attitude involved
Lisa: plain and simple
Kevin: why are they dangerous?
Lisa: hmmm
Kevin: did you know 10 times more people are killed in car accidents than by guns?
Lisa: ever see the result of a gun shot wound?
Kevin: sure have
Lisa: haha that's the stupid statistic I ever heard... (Must not have heard many statistics)
Lisa: think about that one kev
Kevin: why?
Lisa: how many people have cars compared with how many people have guns?
Kevin: there are over 60 million gun owners in the U.S alone
Kevin: and over 200 million guns in the U.S
Lisa: and your point is? (Didn’t he just answer your question?)
Kevin: Children Accidental Death Rates (Ages 0-14)
Cause Number
Motor-vehicle 2,900
Drowning 965
Fires, burns 676
Mechanical suffocation 474
Ingestion of food, object 185
Firearms 142

Lisa: look at that age range...0-14...they shouldn't have access to a gun (what difference does that make?)
Lisa: and I told you...I don't care about the stats, rules or laws (you’re right stats, rules, or laws never helped solve anything)...they are dangerous bottom line
Kevin: should they have access to a pool to drown in?
Kevin: so is everything else.....so that argument doesn't hold water
Lisa: I refuse to argue with you (who’s the one cursing the other out?)...some guns are necessary. Army, police....and such...most guns are not...
Kevin: so then why are cars that go over 75 mph necessary?
Lisa: I said I refuse to argue with you (well then stop…you’re the only one arguing)
Kevin: I’m not arguing
Kevin: I’m presenting you with the facts
Lisa: facts? Ha (what do YOU consider a fact??)
Kevin: so you think I’m lying?
Lisa: no I think your facts aren't comparable (look below for comment)
Kevin: comparable to what?
Lisa: swimming pools and guns? C’mon on now
Kevin: more kids died in swimming pools than guns.....so by your argument swimming pools are dangerous and should be banned......right?
Lisa: would you let you kids go swimming?
Kevin: only with adult supervision
Lisa: would you let them play with a loaded gun?
Kevin: "play" no.....would I let them shoot at a range...yes
Lisa: see...different
Kevin: yes definitely
Kevin: I’m not saying kids should play with guns....any parent who has little kids and doesn't lock up their guns is irresponsible
Lisa: well by your "facts" they shouldn't have pools either (By his facts and YOUR argument kids shouldn’t have pools)
Lisa: and pools are also required to be locked up
Kevin: not without adult supervision
Kevin: they shouldn't
Lisa: I would tell my kid to go swimming
Lisa: I would never tell my kid to play with a gun
Lisa: it's just unnecessary (yet swimming is of course necessary)
Kevin: well now you're being incomparable
Lisa: no I’m not
Lisa: I agree there should be a right to bear arms (really?? Coulda fooled us)
Kevin: I never said kids should "play" with guns
Lisa: but the law should be updated (which of the 20,000 and why?)
Lisa: well I say no one should play with guns
Kevin: kids shouldn't touch a gun unless a responsible adult is present
Lisa: it’s unnecessary (Then what is?)
Lisa: kids shouldn't touch a gun period
Kevin: it's been proven that if you teach a kid how to use a gun and explain to them not to touch them they have a much lower danger
Kevin: it's like anything else if you make it mysterious and forbidden they want to see it more
Lisa: I don't give a ???? about that....get off the kids thing...I don't care how old you are...it shouldn't be for play (whoever said anything about kids playing with guns???)
Kevin: well no kidding
Kevin: when did I say otherwise???
Lisa: you collect them....
Kevin: yes.....so?
Lisa: that's like play...I friggin collect precious moments (Since when does collect mean play?)
Kevin: do you sit there and play with them?
Kevin: or do you keep them on the wall or in a case?
Lisa: sometimes I love to look at them. They are beautiful (We can only assume that when she made collect equal play she also changed look to play as well)
Kevin: well then it's the same thing
Lisa: I don't have to lock them up
Lisa: definitely not the same thing
Kevin: ok you're confusing me.....what is your argument?
Kevin: the main fact is that there are more innocent lives saved and protected by guns than those that are taken or hurt.
Lisa: guns should not be incorporated with fun (Don’t different people enjoy different things?)....only should be used by police and army...and I guess hunters but they should be required to keep them locked up at the hunting place...no games...no collecting...nothing unnecessary. (Huh??...It hurts sometimes….it really does)
Lisa: I doubt that.
Kevin: I’ve been reading on firearms law since I was 14...trust me I know
Lisa: I TOLD YOU I'M NOT INTERESTED IN LAWS (Why not??)
Kevin: so what you're saying is that you believe what you believe and no amount of scientific studies, facts, and statistics will ever change that?
Lisa: they are dangerous Kev...bottom line....and you can't tell me they aren't...and I don't care what else is or isn't dangerous...they are dangerous and they do take innocent lives...I know they help protect...and I agree that Police and military should use them and carry them....but as for just having them cause you like them is unnecessary...just playing games with them is unnecessary. And no...No facts or stats will change my opinion. I will put my kid in a car seat in my car, and take them swimming, and
Lisa: let them do plenty of things...they will never shoot a gun.
(Along with being ridiculous….she’s not open to facts….rather dumb)
Kevin: how can you justify that.....you're saying that you know what's true just because you know, when people have been looking at the facts for years and know exactly what guns do and don't?
Lisa: You saying guns don't kill people? (When did he ever say that?)
Lisa: that's all I need to know.
Kevin: no....I’m saying guns kill a lot more bad guys than good guys to put it in layman’s terms
Kevin: and that guns in civilian hands are a major cause for a decrease in crime
Lisa: its unfortunate that the idiots in Philly and in schools, and God only knows where else have to kill people and ruin it for you...but I don't like it...and I don't care about the friggin laws so stop telling me. (Once again…..why not?)
Lisa: you aren't going to change my mind and I’m rather tired of talking about it.
Kevin: see and that's exactly why I’m edgy.....because people have a closed mind
Lisa: I don't have a closed mind (Clearly you do!!!)...I say cops and military should use them.
Lisa: I don't care what profession my husband has...I will NOT have a gun in my house. (What if he’s a cop or a military officer???)
Kevin: sure you do....you refuse to admit that civilians can have a positive impact with guns
Lisa: what exactly is the positive impact?
Kevin: Survey research during the early 1990s by criminologist Gary Kleck showed at least 2.5 million protective uses of firearms each year in the U.S. "(T)he best available evidence indicates that guns were used about three to five times as often for defensive purposes as for criminal purposes" (Kleck, Targeting Guns, 1997).
Lisa: Jesus Christ
Kevin: Most protective uses do not involve discharge of a firearm. In only about 0.1% of protective gun uses are criminals killed and in only 1% are criminals wounded. A Dept. of Justice survey found that 40% of felons chose not to commit at least some crimes for fear their victims were armed, and 34% admitted being scared off or shot at by armed victims. (James D. Wright, Peter H. Rossi, Armed and Considered Dangerous, 1986)
Lisa: what do I have to do to tell you I don't want stats and laws??????????????????? (Did he not just answer your question?)
Kevin: why? because they prove what you don't want to believe?
Lisa: by telling me that sh*t...just makes me believe that you are a follower and a not a believer is all. (If you believe in something wouldn’t you follow it??)
Kevin: because I do research???????
Kevin: and can find reasons to back up what I believe????
Kevin: if you were talking about surgery and said to a doctor "I’m going to do the surgery this way and I don't want to see any statistics otherwise" even if they show a better way wouldn't that be ridiculous?
Lisa: Kev...stop (Why cause you can’t handle the truth?)
Kevin: we can't have an intelligent discussion?
Lisa: this isn't intelligent
Kevin: LMAO why not?
Lisa: because you are friggin throwing stats at me (Of course she’s right intelligence and statistics don’t mix)...I don't have discussions like that (Yeah cause that would be too logical)
Kevin: so you're saying stats are useless?
Kevin: and we shouldn't use them
Lisa: you just like to argue...and I'm tired of it now. I don't like them.
Lisa: oh ???? kev
Lisa: ????in stop it
Lisa: I love stats
Lisa: they are important (Then why don’t you want to hear about them??)
Kevin: just not when they are against your argument basically?
Lisa: I wanted to be a statistician at one point
Lisa: f**k you kev
Lisa: screw it (Why cause you’re wrong?)
Kevin: well that's what you're saying
Lisa: bye
Kevin: I’m not getting mad...you are
Lisa: BYE
Lisa: you don’t discuss kev
Lisa: you argue
Lisa: and I can't take it

Talk about :banghead:
 
aaaaaaaaaccckkkkkk! I have a headache. It's pointless to confuse an anti with the facts when their feelings are already made up.:banghead:
 
Wow. May I suggest a thought exercise for your friend? A little role-playing scenario?

Step 1: Get a friend to play the "cop." You play the "bad guy." She plays the "victim."
Step 2: You walk in the door, she calls the "cop" on the phone.
Step 3: You proceed to start hitting her with a pillow.
Step 4: 10 minutes later, the "cop" walks in and stops you.
Step 5: Tell her, in a real situation, the first 10 or 20 hits would have been punches, or hits with a baseball bat, and the rest of the time would have been alloted to rape. Or, if she were armed, maybe the "bad guy" would have just been lying on the floor bleeding during the 10 minutes it took the cop to get there. Her call.
 
I'm speechless.

If she doesn't want to look at stats, or laws, or capabilities of the gun... what does she look at?
 
Has anyone seen the back of my skull? My brain apparently knocked it somewhere when it ran screaming from the room. I was able to find my brain hiding in the corner whimpering but the hairy bone part is still missing :eek: .

Amazing, simply amazing.

Greg
 
This chat is the Platonic reprentation of gun control debates.

This is every gun control argument I have ever been in.

Sometimes it takes days of posting or hours of FtF debating to get this far but they all hit all the points here.


Anti: Give me stats!

Gunny: Well x of y = xyz says the DOD etc...


Anti: I hate stats! Stoping using them as a crutch!

Gunny: You said you wanted stats.

Anti: dont f****** argue, youre being mean.
 
At least the last person who freaked out on me about this was nice enugh to apologize for over-reacting the nest day...

You were right about the brain trying to get away from the optic nerves.
 
I might save this conversation so every time I think my debating skills are bad I can read it and feel smart.

Thanks for the chuckle. :D
 
mnjmnmnbmju hunjhmbnujmbu8bn hmjnhbujmnhbujmhbgbnhbnh junjhbnbhbnh jnb uiyu mb nhjm hmy ujhuky y ygyg

The above was me slamming my head against the keyboard. (No, really, I was. Try it. You might want to do it gently, though.)

I could have easily just used our favorite smiley. :banghead:
 
Holy...

Well, my cooking teacher is about that dense.


It was pitiful, a classmate and I, just by mentioning how X weapons (.22s and handguns) are used in crime more than "assault weapons", we got her from thinking that just "OMG assault rifles!" should be banned, to thinking everything should be banned.

It was definitely a: :confused: :eek: :banghead: :barf: - type moment.

The only thing she understood at the end of the conversation was that "assault weapons" are not used very often in crime. :banghead:
 
Someone check Lisa for a pulse, 'cause there sure aren't any brain waves.

There's some good posts up above.

Grimlock, you sure cut the chase with that suggestion. I bet it would work.

-Jim
 
Lisa: you don’t discuss kev
Lisa: you argue
Lisa: and I can't take it

The interesting thing in this thread are the last three lines. Lisa lets us know that she wants to "discuss" the topic and, I think, come to a general agreement. She also lets know that Kevin wants to win the "argument".

That seems to me, to be one of the basic differences of men and women in our society. She also lets us know that how see feels about something is more important then reality.


Respectfully,

jdkelly
 
I had a few like that in college.

My next door neighbor freaked out when she saw a picture of a 1911 and a BHP in my bedroom. We debated this endlessly, and it was about the same as that.

It got to the point that she didn't ever talk to me (which was how I would have preferred it in the first place). He closing argument was, "I just feel that we, as a society, have progressed far enough that we no longer have a use for guns." :rolleyes: Sounds like Dorothy needs a wake-up trip to Oz.

:barf: Wes
 
Lisa must be really, really, pretty.

Yeah she was.....I know eventually I woulda got some but I couldn't take it any longer and haven't talked to her in about a year. lmao
 
Total - utter - unadulterated - unmitigated - ulcer-inducing - agnst-producing - migraine-triggering ......

LOST CAUSE.

Definitely .... stick to the ''agnostics'' .... they at least have the chance to ''see the light'' when educated ...... and come round to logic and sense!

Amazing.:p
 
I feel exponentially dumber for having read that. Reminds me of my ex-wife......"my mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts"

In my limited experience, it's impossible to have a logical discussion with a person ruled by their emotions.

I think you did the right thing by moving on.........


Len in PHoenix
 
one woman's reaction to that conversation...

The interesting thing in this thread are the last three lines. Lisa lets us know that she wants to "discuss" the topic and, I think, come to a general agreement. She also lets know that Kevin wants to win the "argument".

That seems to me, to be one of the basic differences of men and women in our society. She also lets us know that how see feels about something is more important then reality.
jdkelly,

Interesting and, I think, mostly accurate comments. I'd like to expand upon them a little bit. Except for one point at the end, I'm specifically NOT arguing with your take on things -- but I'd like to present a slightly different angle on this whole conversation.

I think you really hit something important when you commented that there was a male/female difference in communication going on here. While I really (reallyreallyreallyreally) hate buying into gender stereotypes on any level, for the rest of this post I'm temporarily buying into yours.

Think about how the conversation could have gone if it had been two women talking.

Lisa: "What do you need a rifle for?"
K(ummm, Kelly, I guess): "Well, I really enjoy shooting it. It helps me enjoy after a frustrating day, it's kind of like yoga because you have to let go of all the stress of the day and *just* concentrate on what your body and breathing are doing. It's a lot of fun. Plus, I just feel safer when I have one in the house..."

Lisa, instead of asking a socio/political question, could have been interpreted as asking a personal one, as a way to understand each other better. And Kelly would have answered on that basis. Incidentally, look at the first few exchanges in that log again. Pretty sure that's what got the real Lisa torqued in the first place -- that Kevin was not going to show her his feelings or emotions, that he started right out thinking that she wanted to argue and debate with him. I don't think she started there (though she surely ended there, and plenty steamed to boot!)

Try this sample on for size, from the real conversation:
Lisa: I accept...but I guess you should know...I don't like guns...and I was very happy that we didn't go to that beef and beer thing last weekend. Seems it was at a gun club.
Kevin: yes I told you that
Lisa: Hmm...I don't remember you telling me that...Billy got home and was telling me about some game they were playing shooting stuff...and I was sooooo glad I didn't go. I would have wanted to leave as soon as we got there.
Lisa's first sentence above was probably the whole reason she brought up the subject in the first place. She wanted to discuss that weekend and maybe come to some agreement about future plans of this sort. Mostly she wanted him to convince her that he understood that she felt that way. She didn't want him to say, You shouldn't feel that way, or That's a stupid thing to think. She wanted him to show some respect for her feelings -- and no, that doesn't mean she wanted him to feel the same way himself!

An example: When I think about getting on a motorcycle, I get all squishly unhappy inside and my toes curl. I know perfectly well that my buddy is a safe motorcycle driver, so when it would have been most convenient for me to grab a ride with him and I refused. He said, "Ok, what's the deal here? I'm missing something." I explained how I felt. His response was wonderful: "Ah, I understand. They really scare you, don't they? Tell you what. We'll find another way to get you home. And, um, I bet you don't like being scared of them like you are, and you know fears just get worse if you leave them alone. If you ever decide you want to get over that fear instead of just letting it be, come to me and I'll give you a really gentle introduction to the art. You can ride on the back of mine and we'll stop any time you want to..." He didn't buy into my feelings himself, I know he thinks it's a little silly how frightened the dang things make me, but he acknowledged what I said and showed some respect for it. One of these days I might take him up on it... um. Well, maybe not. :uhoh:

Anyway.

If Lisa had been talking to her girlfriend Kelly instead of to male Kevin, it would probably have looked like this:

Lisa: I accept...but I guess you should know...I don't like guns...and I was very happy that we didn't go to that beef and beer thing last weekend. Seems it was at a gun club

Kelly: Yes, I thought I told you that. Would that have bothered you?

Lisa: Hmm...I don't remember you telling me that...Billy got home and was telling me about some game they were playing shooting stuff...and I was sooooo glad I didn't go. I would have wanted to leave as soon as we got there.

Kelly: That's too bad. I really enjoy hanging out down there, and it's kind of gotten to be an important part of my life. Listen, you wouldn't believe this great time we had last weekend at the range....

The conversation could have gone on from there, and if it had veered into politics, it would have been on a more personal level. Something like

Lisa: that's like play...I friggin collect precious moments
Lisa: sometimes I love to look at them. They are beautiful

Kelly: Yeah, it is, isn't it?
Kelly: I really like finding one that's a little different, or more rare, or finding an old one and cleaning it up so it's like new again. That's one of the things I enjoy.
Kelly: so it's pretty well the same thing

Lisa: I don't have to lock them up
Lisa: definitely not the same thing

Kelly: Yeah, you're right, I do have to lock up my guns. It makes me pretty sad sometimes when I realize other people don't understand why I want to collect guns, or why I enjoy shooting targets. It's important to me and the laws about it are just crazy. Did you know there are about 20,000 federal gun laws on the books? It makes me feel like some kind of monster or something. All I really want is just to be left alone to enjoy my hobby. Is that too much to ask?

At this point she'd have been nodding along in sympathy, agreeing with Kelly that it's kind of sad that people won't just leave her alone to enjoy her hobby.

The point that I am trying to make, in my own too-long, fumbly fashion, is that it is possible to communicate respect for the other person's feelings without buying into whatever nutty political views you think they hold.

Kevin, early in the conversation, could have communicated his willingness to discuss his own reasons for having guns and his feelings about them (he did, eventually, after he was badgered into it -- but by then it was obvious that he wanted a debate rather than a conversation, and Lisa angrily gave it to him. He never did get why she was so angry, and I bet he still doesn't).

The other important point I want to make is about jdkelly's comment, "She also lets us know that how see feels about something is more important than reality."

This is where men often go wrong. Pay attention here, fellas: Her feelings ARE an important part of reality.

Feelings are facts, too! Remember it. In any conversation, feelings are facts to take into account.

By failing to acknowledge what she said and by showing contempt for her attempts to communicate and get closer, Kevin actually blew what could have been an excellent opportunity to show this woman a little piece of his world. Because instead he brushed off her feelings and never admitted to any of his own, the conversation ended with angry dismissals rather than with her saying grudgingly, "Well, maybe someday I'll go to the range with you..." as a way of affirming that she understood his expressed feelings.

pax

We are not won by arguments that we can analyze, but by tone and temper; by the manner, which is the man himself. -- Samuel Butler
 
I think you have something there pax, they both made some errors in handling the situation. Acknowledging a woman's feeling is imporatant, a lesson I am constantly reminded to keep working on by my wife!:D It is a two way street, however, and I noticed 'Lisa' didn't even attempt to meet him halfway on that. It seemed she used his mentioning fixing his piantball gun to launch a diatribe against guns; an illogical, 'don't confuse me with the facts' diatribe. I did notice that while Kev remained calm, he tended to lag behind on the 'verbal akido' , and didn't even attempt to use emotions in his cause. I picke this up here, and it seems to turn antis (particularly young mothers) right around, at least to the point of considering that guns can be useful!


If you woke up in the middle of the night and found out someone was trying to kill your son/daughter in the next room RIGHT NOW, and on your night stand were two items: A gun and a phone; which would you pick up?" If they say phone, don't bother. The conversation ends there. If they say gun, then you tell them as responsible parents then, they should learn how to shoot, store, clean a gun. "How can you make that choice if there is no gun in your house??"

See, emotion, and one of the most powerful, used for instead of against us!;) "It's for the children!":evil:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top