I don't have a digi cam, and even if I did, my Glock 30 looks just like all the other glocks
I didn't pick the 30 because it had better sights than the 21, but just more versatility. Since I was moving into a new system and caliber (striker fired .45s from DA 9mms), I figured my first purchase should be as multi-role as possible. My wife said I could only get one, so until next year's tax return, it will have to hold. The 21 would probably be a much better shooter, but much more limited for CCW. The Glock shape prints a lot more than my Beretta does, so that's -1 point for the blocky glocky.
I will try to pick up two 13 round mags soon though. That way if I get a 21 later and they have are mandating 10 rounders only, I will still have 13 rounders. Plus, the 13-rd magazines work in the 30.
I really want a Glock 20 as well. Just for novelty sake. But I don't have $600 for novelties right now.
I'm still scared of the lack of safety. It's like a revolver, except the trigger pull is about half and the length of pull is about half. I swear, these things are much more along the lines of a single action than a double.
Does anyone know of any cases where someone got something stuck in their holster? Just for experiment sake, I put in snap caps and holstered with my finger in the trigger guard. *Click* went the striker. I am guessing that is where 90% of Glock ND's come from.... lesson, always keep your finger out of the trigger guard until ready to fire.
The Glock is a great pistol, and it is much easier to master than anything else out there, but would it be accurate to say that it is unforgiving of human error and negligence?