I've had a BHP of some flavor on my Want List for a long time. It's nice to see more options open up, and I really like the looks of the SA-35.
OP, that's a beauty!
OP, that's a beauty!
I believe it was just the opposite.
Kind of changing gears… I’ve been a little surprised at the amount of interest this “new” old design offering from SA has created.
Assuming these pistols perform well (and I think they probably will), you can put me down for one at some future point.
I like the subtle changes made on the SA 35, and how they enhance the classic design without detracting from it.
Reasons I learned on the internet not to buy certain guns…
Bill Ruger embraced gun control.
S&W uses internal locks.
SA lies about parts origins.
Sig makes parts in India.
Mossberg uses Mexican parts.
Colt just sucks in general.
Henry and SA fool people with recycled company names.
Charter Arms are poorly made.
Heritage is pot metal.
Hi Points are fugly.
Kel Tec is cheap plastic.
Kimber is MIM junk.
Oh, and Hi Powers are flimsy.
I would snap up a polished SS SA-35 in heartbeat. Hopefully they thinking about models like this for the future
I still think they should have put a beaver tail on it.
I still think they should have put a beaver tail on it.
That is supposed to have been addressed by going with the burr hammerCould not agree more. Even just a little upsweep to eliminate the hammer/slide bite issues many (like myself) have had.
That is supposed to have been addressed by going with the burr hammer
And the Mk. III firing pin safety; it's foolproof, doesn't impact trigger pull and offers some protection if the sear or hammer engagement surfaces fail.Could not agree more. Even just a little upsweep to eliminate the hammer/slide bite issues many (like myself) have had.
And the Mk. III firing pin safety; it's foolproof, doesn't impact trigger pull and offers some protection if the sear or hammer engagement surfaces fail.
Larry
The SA does not have one.Can you expand in that please.
Is the SA firing pin safety different than the Mk III and, if so, how?
The SA does not have one.
Firing pin safeties are controversial, generally. On a 1911 they can affect the trigger pull (although a good smith can still get a great trigger on a 1911 with a FPS), but the High Power FPS is about the best design possible; it doesn't impact the trigger pull, has no history of failing and adds little complexity to the design.Huh..... that's a negative thing, isn't it?
Is there an advantage to not having a firing oun safety?
Thanks for the reply WVsig. I really value your knowledge...particularly in regards to HP's
Firing pin safeties are controversial, generally. On a 1911 they can affect the trigger pull (although a good smith can still get a great trigger on a 1911 with a FPS), but the High Power FPS is about the best design possible; it doesn't impact the trigger pull, has no history of failing and adds little complexity to the design.
The HP design lacks a grip safety, relying solely on the thumb safety to prevent an ND. I've owned a number of them without a FPS, but today will only carry my Mk. III. There are too many weapons with a FPS today for me to justify carrying one without. My 1911's are about split between FPS/No FPS, but I only carry those with one these days, as well.
Larry
I just read on S. A. website that it only comes with ONE magazine !!! *** ? One magazine for a gun that almost costs $700 is very crappy in my opinion .