Got myself a SA-35

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've had a BHP of some flavor on my Want List for a long time. It's nice to see more options open up, and I really like the looks of the SA-35.

OP, that's a beauty!
 
It's nice to know that there is still a market for classic old school firearms. SAI obviously feel they can make a good profit at a reasonable MSRP. I just hope the GB madness ends soon. Nothing causes the makers to raise prices more than actual proof that they can sell them for more. My local shops are selling their SA-35s on GB and not in their stores just like they did with the SP5s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: md7
Kind of changing gears… I’ve been a little surprised at the amount of interest this “new” old design offering from SA has created.

Assuming these pistols perform well (and I think they probably will), you can put me down for one at some future point.

I like the subtle changes made on the SA 35, and how they enhance the classic design without detracting from it.
 
Kind of changing gears… I’ve been a little surprised at the amount of interest this “new” old design offering from SA has created.

Assuming these pistols perform well (and I think they probably will), you can put me down for one at some future point.

I like the subtle changes made on the SA 35, and how they enhance the classic design without detracting from it.

I agree, they made some very smart changes I think. I doubt I’ll ever want a BHP again, but I’m still interested in at least shooting one of these and see how it feels
 
Reasons I learned on the internet not to buy certain guns…

Bill Ruger embraced gun control.
S&W uses internal locks.
SA lies about parts origins.
Sig makes parts in India.
Mossberg uses Mexican parts.
Colt just sucks in general.
Henry and SA fool people with recycled company names.
Charter Arms are poorly made.
Heritage is pot metal.
Hi Points are fugly.
Kel Tec is cheap plastic.
Kimber is MIM junk.

Oh, and Hi Powers are flimsy.

But now Colt = CZ, so... hope?

I would snap up a polished SS SA-35 in heartbeat. Hopefully they thinking about models like this for the future

Man, a polished stainless SA-35... detective model.
 
That is supposed to have been addressed by going with the burr hammer

I saw that, but with my hand size/shape I got bit by the slide itself fairly often, a beavertail would have been better for me.

I doubt the burr hammer would make a difference for me.
 
Could not agree more. Even just a little upsweep to eliminate the hammer/slide bite issues many (like myself) have had.
And the Mk. III firing pin safety; it's foolproof, doesn't impact trigger pull and offers some protection if the sear or hammer engagement surfaces fail.

Larry
 
To the original poster , can you post an up-close picture of the extractor ? I am trying to see it. It looks a little on the thin side but it's hard to see from just a picture of the whole gun. Also , a picture of the extractor claw from looking down inside the ejection port/chamber ? Thanks for any help .
 
I just read on S. A. website that it only comes with ONE magazine !!! *** ? One magazine for a gun that almost costs $700 is very crappy in my opinion .
 
I am sure they are trying to get as many out the door as possible, and mags production can be a pinch point. They had a spare mag and holster package incentive going when I bought an SA pistol years ago, and I suspect we may see something like that once the initial surge has subsided. I would also expect to see things like ambi safeties and beavertail enhancement if complaints start showing up in videos and ratings.
 
And the Mk. III firing pin safety; it's foolproof, doesn't impact trigger pull and offers some protection if the sear or hammer engagement surfaces fail.

Larry

Can you expand in that please.

Is the SA firing pin safety different than the Mk III and, if so, how?
 
Huh..... that's a negative thing, isn't it?

Is there an advantage to not having a firing oun safety?


Thanks for the reply WVsig. I really value your knowledge...particularly in regards to HP's
Firing pin safeties are controversial, generally. On a 1911 they can affect the trigger pull (although a good smith can still get a great trigger on a 1911 with a FPS), but the High Power FPS is about the best design possible; it doesn't impact the trigger pull, has no history of failing and adds little complexity to the design.

The HP design lacks a grip safety, relying solely on the thumb safety to prevent an ND. I've owned a number of them without a FPS, but today will only carry my Mk. III. There are too many weapons with a FPS today for me to justify carrying one without. My 1911's are about split between FPS/No FPS, but I only carry those with one these days, as well.

Larry
 
Firing pin safeties are controversial, generally. On a 1911 they can affect the trigger pull (although a good smith can still get a great trigger on a 1911 with a FPS), but the High Power FPS is about the best design possible; it doesn't impact the trigger pull, has no history of failing and adds little complexity to the design.

The HP design lacks a grip safety, relying solely on the thumb safety to prevent an ND. I've owned a number of them without a FPS, but today will only carry my Mk. III. There are too many weapons with a FPS today for me to justify carrying one without. My 1911's are about split between FPS/No FPS, but I only carry those with one these days, as well.

Larry

Thanks Larry. I have a MkIII as well. It's my favorite and I shoot it best even though I shoot my M&P9c far far more.

The SA35 got me really excited as I figured I could use it as a shooter and field carry it and then safe queen my MkIII for possible retirement or new truck funds (some humor in there)

But I admit that the lack of FPS tempers my excitement some.

Thanks again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top