tasunkawitko
Member
as per mr. jack o'connor, here are some "rules" for long-range hunting. i believe that they can be agreed on by most of us here, even the long-range hunters!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a long-range shot should never be taken if there is a reasonable chance of getting closer.
a long-range shot should never be taken if the rifleman feels doubtful of his ability to make a good, solid, well-placed hit.
a long-range shot should never be taken if the hunter cannot get into a solid position - prone with a sling, from a rest, etc.
a long-range shot should never be taken at any dangerous animal - a brown, grizzly or polar bear, a lion, a tiger, a leopard, a cape buffalo.
a long-range shot should never be taken at an unwounded, running animal.
a long-range shot should never be taken if the animal shot at can get out of sight so quickly that it would be difficult to ascertain the effect of the shot.
a long-range shot should not be taken if the range is so great that a hold on top of the shoulders will not drop a bullet into the chest cavity.
these rules may seem ultra conservative to many, and i must admit that there have been times when i did not follow them myself. however, the more i hunt and the more i see others shoot the more convinced i am that they are wise and sensible rules and if they were universally adopted the number of game animals that get away wounded to suffer and die would be greatly reduced.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the question then remains, what defines a long-range shot on a game animal?
i believe that each hunter has to make an honest evaluation of his own abilities (not the rifle's) and let his moral and ethical judgement guide his choice when the game is sighted.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a long-range shot should never be taken if there is a reasonable chance of getting closer.
a long-range shot should never be taken if the rifleman feels doubtful of his ability to make a good, solid, well-placed hit.
a long-range shot should never be taken if the hunter cannot get into a solid position - prone with a sling, from a rest, etc.
a long-range shot should never be taken at any dangerous animal - a brown, grizzly or polar bear, a lion, a tiger, a leopard, a cape buffalo.
a long-range shot should never be taken at an unwounded, running animal.
a long-range shot should never be taken if the animal shot at can get out of sight so quickly that it would be difficult to ascertain the effect of the shot.
a long-range shot should not be taken if the range is so great that a hold on top of the shoulders will not drop a bullet into the chest cavity.
these rules may seem ultra conservative to many, and i must admit that there have been times when i did not follow them myself. however, the more i hunt and the more i see others shoot the more convinced i am that they are wise and sensible rules and if they were universally adopted the number of game animals that get away wounded to suffer and die would be greatly reduced.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the question then remains, what defines a long-range shot on a game animal?
i believe that each hunter has to make an honest evaluation of his own abilities (not the rifle's) and let his moral and ethical judgement guide his choice when the game is sighted.