Hey Art Eatman - which bullet weight in .243 for deer neck shots?

Status
Not open for further replies.

GunGoBoom

member
Joined
Aug 4, 2004
Messages
1,645
Hi Art - I've heard you say that you've taken many a whitetail with neck shots with a .243. Well this year I'm planning to hunt them with my new NEF single shot in .243, and try the neck shots. But my question is this. I'd prefer a well-constructed 100 or 105 for a vitals shot. However, OTOH, for neck shots specifically, would an 85 or the 100/105 grain be better - with my possible theory being that the 85 (or lighter even) might be preferable as it would be more explosive and not need to penetrate any bone. Or should I stick to 100/105s in case a neck shot is not presented, but a good vitals shot is presented to me? BTW, the deer here are small to medium - not huge.
 
Well, I ain't Art, but it were me, I'd stick with 100/105 grain bullets. Gives you more flexibility in which shots you can take, and it's not like the extra penetration on the next will hurt your ability to make a clean kill. Only reason I can see with going to 85gr bullets is if you get better accuracy with them compared to 100-105gr.
 
I guess there's a lot more that goes into the deal besides just the bullet weight.

Generally, the deer I was shooting field-dressed out from 80 lbs or so (does) to maybe 110 to 120 pounds for the bucks. IOW, smaller deer. And, mostly, the ranges were fairly short, rarely much beyond 125 yards or so.

The twist on my Sako is a bit slow; it drives tacks with the 85-grain and 70-grain bullets, but doesn't do all that well with the 100s.

I will say that on a heart/lung body shot, that 85-grain Sierra HPBT creates a double-handful of mush, and none of the deer had to be tracked.

Some other factors: First off, I've been shooting since I was a kid. I guess I have a "feel" about taking a shot, after all these years. There have been times I've passed a fairly easy shot because somehow I just knew I couldn't hit that deer if we were locked up together in a closet. Other times I've made some fairly difficult shots because I flat-out knew there was no way I could miss. Dangfino.

Second, the trigger is almost as good as a Canjar, and that sure makes a difference.

I don't guess I've ever taken an angling shot. That 85-grain bullet won't penetrate far before making a mess, so straight on from the front or directly across the body is preferred. A 100-grain Nosler wouldn't have that problem, most likely.

And, there are the little bits and pieces: I handload, and had worked up a couple of loads. 40 or 50 rounds? Plinking, another box or two. A few feral cats and jackrabbits, before I ever went looking for Bambi. IWO, I was halfway married-up to the rifle. And that's aside from other shooting...

I guess just figure out what your own particular deal is for the size of your deer, typical distances, and your own skill level--and practice all you can.
 
Alright, thanks, Art! Yes, it will have to depend of course on which shoots best in my gun (haven't yet tested that). But I just wouldn't feel comfortable shooting through a shoulder with an 85 gr .243, even though it would *probably* work just fine. As you say, you have developed a feel for when to take the shot and when not to. I don't yet have that feel, and I don't want to let my harvest get away. So even if I'm focusing on neck shots - in case they don't present themselves, I'm running with 100/105s most likely since they would work best for all situations - now just need to test and learn trajectory/PBR well in the next 2 months.
 
With a 100-grain bullet and a scoped rifle, if you sight in at 2" high at 100 yards, you'll be right at dead on at 200. Might not be exact; close as makes no nevermind.

That sight-in works for almost all non-magnum, non-hotshot centerfire .22s that are any notable amount faster than a .30-30.

Art
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top