Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

hi-point 9mm compact for ccw??

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by seansean, Mar 23, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. seansean

    seansean Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Messages:
    209
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    I've read horrible things about these guns, but I also read that the quality is much improved since they got new owners. anyone have one of these, and are they good for ccw?
     
  2. Seraph

    Seraph Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2004
    Messages:
    392
    Wouldn't your Ruger P89 be more concealable?
     
  3. denfoote

    denfoote Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    4,622
    Location:
    Near the border of occupied Azlan and Mexico.
    Your P89 is a much better choice!!!
    Please do not buy a High Point!!
    Do a search on my screen name and High Point to find out why!!!
     
  4. White Horseradish

    White Horseradish Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2004
    Messages:
    1,352
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Well, only if you wear a puffy down jacket.

    Hi-points are good for many things, but CCW ain't one of them.
     
  5. PX15

    PX15 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,522
    Location:
    SE Georgia
    If you must own a HiPoint then get a 9mm model 995 carbine. I've heard nightmare stories about their pistol line.

    You can get a KelTec P11 9mm for about $225. Mine has been very reliable and accurate from self defense range.

    JMO :)
     
  6. Walt Sherrill

    Walt Sherrill Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    4,914
    Location:
    Winston-Salem, NC
    PX15 has a good point: the Kel-Tec P-11 would cost a bit more (not much more if you buy used), but would be a MUCH better weapon for concealed carry.

    The Hi-Points are much maligned-- a much as for how they look as anything -- but concealiblity isn't one of their strong points.
     
  7. WillBrayJr

    WillBrayJr Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2004
    Messages:
    371
    Location:
    Northern Indiana for now
    Hi-Points are better left for target shooting. Zinc alloy is soft and brittle, plus the firing pins will often break. The Ruger P89 is much much better all around ;)
     
  8. LoadedDrum

    LoadedDrum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    612
    There are plenty of better cheap carry choices, ie STAR, Markov, CZ52.
     
  9. 355sigfan

    355sigfan member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,850
    Location:
    Alaska
    They would be good for drop guns. Lol Just kidding guys.

    They suck pure and simple. They are unreliable pieces of trash from my experence.
    Pat
     
  10. wasrjoe

    wasrjoe Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,242
    Location:
    Arizona
    Makarov, Bersa, Kel-Tec, Star - any of those (and a few others I forgot to mention, I'm sure!) will serve your purpose much better and cost little more.
     
  11. TheEgg

    TheEgg Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    1,363
  12. seansean

    seansean Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Messages:
    209
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    :uhoh: thanks for the opinions, I think I'll wait and save my money for a better gun .
     
  13. blacksuit

    blacksuit Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2004
    Messages:
    82
    Location:
    Kansas
    I have one, a throw down. :neener:
     
  14. Lennyjoe

    Lennyjoe Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,052
    Location:
    Southwestern Ohio
    i wouldnt trust my life with a Hi-Point.
     
  15. Ranger61

    Ranger61 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    73
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    I don't think you should ccw with a high point. The safety is tiny and hard to operate on mine. It has been very reliable and surprisingly pretty accurate but its bulky and not light. I would pick my Keltec P11 or my Star BM as far superior and I really like my smith 3913 for ccw, light , thin but large enough to get a good, quick grip on it. :)
     
  16. mfree

    mfree Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,079
    Location:
    Knoxville, TN
    For merely asking, you have forgotten the face of your father...
     
  17. seansean

    seansean Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Messages:
    209
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    mfree said:
    For merely asking, you have forgotten the face of your father...
    __________________
    CZ75B Compact, CZ52, Walther P22, more?

    I cry your pardon, gunslinger. :cool:
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2005
  18. larry starling

    larry starling Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Messages:
    723
    Location:
    north carolina
    You have to be kidding!!!!! :eek: A high point :barf: Man you would be better off carrying a hammer!!!!I know for a fact it would be more reliable!!!!!there is no way in h--l,I would trust my life to such an awfull weapon!!!! :what: save your money and buy somthing made with a little more quality!!!!! :evil:
     
  19. txcoyote

    txcoyote Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2004
    Messages:
    50
    Ah, you said the magic inflammatory words Hi-Point and will now get tons of responses, mainly from folks that have never shot one,... much less owned one.

    This may be a moot point since it appears that you have already made up your mind, but if want input from Hi-Point owners, go read the postings and experiences at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Hi-Point/ from a bunch of happy owners. There is also a recent interesting report at http://www.fraternalorderlawenforcement.com/hipoint.html on the Hi-Point 380.

    In my case, my Hi-Point C-9 comp has fired hundreds of rounds with no problems and good accuracy. Shucks, I've even cleaned it once..... If it ever does break - first I've heard of the firing pin problem - they have a life-time warranty. For $100, if it gets stolen or banged around in the truck, so what? But a ccw? NO, I don't think so. My S&W 49 is much better suited for that task.
     
  20. Northslope Nimrod

    Northslope Nimrod Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Messages:
    584
    Location:
    Northern Utah
    Hi point for CCW?

    As mentioned, Hi-Points are better for target shooting.....Walk them down range...Return to behind the line...pick up a nice BHP, 1911, or CZ and commence to target shoot.....AT the Hi-Point.
    My brother in law bought one in a lapse of judgement.
    If you want a cheap carry gun....go with a MAKAROV like the one I just bought 2 days ago! ($154)
    YES, I have shot it. The trigger is extremely spongey. In a recent officer involved shooting, the bad guy first tried to commit suicide with a Hi-Point. The primer had a light hit on it but failed to fire. Was it the gun? Was it the doofus holding it? Dunno. They are very blocky = bad for CCW. The trigger really stinks = bad for shooting. Just my 2 cents.
     
  21. 355sigfan

    355sigfan member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,850
    Location:
    Alaska
    I have shot a Highpoint and I know from first hand experience they are total pieces of garbage.
    Pat
     
  22. Justin

    Justin Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    19,270
    Location:
    THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL
    STAR and Mak, yes. CZ52, no. The decocker on many CZ52's do not work properly and will discharge the firearm if used.
    On top of that, the CZ52 has a number of minor mechanical and handling deficiencies that, while not dangerous, are simply not good for a defensive sidearm.

    IMNSHO, the CZ52 is a great range gun, much fun to tinker with both mechanically and load-wise, but would be almost as poor of a choice as a Hi-Point.
     
  23. 355sigfan

    355sigfan member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2003
    Messages:
    1,850
    Location:
    Alaska
    I personally don't care for the Mak. its reliable and reasonably accurate but its underpowered for its mission.
    Pat
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page